San Bernardino

[SmokinMr2]

One correction, check with the department on bringing your firearms to your interview. I called before I went to double check this, was told that doesn't start till November. Call before you go to confirm.

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

Good to know. Sergeant McCoy didn't give me a "start" date when I spoke with him yesterday.

[bcsquare]

I'm curious as to how long some of you waited for the call back. I had my interview on 6/6/14 and was told 90 days until I'd hear back. Well it's 9/11/14 now and I still haven't had so much a call back or letter.

[hardhead]

I'm curious as to how long some of you waited for the call back. I had my interview on 6/6/14 and was told 90 days until I'd hear back. Well it's 9/11/14 now and I still haven't had so much a call back or letter.

My interview was 8/4 and they called me on 9/9 to schedule the qualification date. You might want to follow up with them.

[ivsamhell]

excited to see some motion in the county, been a long two weeks.

http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=812c9186a81db6434329bda16&id=0fe6f2c840

[71MUSTY]

Two major sections:
PC 25400, concealed
Quote:
(a) A person is guilty of carrying a concealed firearm when
the person does any of the following:
(1) Carries concealed within any vehicle that is under the person'
s control or direction any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable
of being concealed upon the person.
(2) Carries concealed upon the person any pistol, revolver, or
other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.
...
(c) Carrying a concealed firearm in violation of this section is
punishable as follows:
...
[[ six felonies and ]]
(7) In all cases other than those specified in paragraphs (1) to
(6), inclusive, by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one
year, by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by
both that imprisonment and fine.
That is, a misdemeanor.

25655 explicitly exempts LTC holders from 25400 for handguns listed on the license.

PC 25850, loaded
Quote:
(a) A person is guilty of carrying a loaded firearm when the
person carries a loaded firearm on the person or in a vehicle while
in any public place or on any public street in an incorporated city
or in any public place or on any public street in a prohibited area
of unincorporated territory.
...
(c) Carrying a loaded firearm in violation of this section is
punishable, as follows:
...
[[ again, six felonies and .. ]
(7) In all cases other than those specified in paragraphs (1) to
(6), inclusive, as a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a
county jail not to exceed one year, by a fine not to exceed one
thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
And again, a misdemeanor.

Penal Code 26010 exempts LTC holders from this law with respect to handguns listed on the LTC.

[SmokinMr2]

excited to see some motion in the county, been a long two weeks.

http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...&id=0fe6f2c840

Waste of effort...

[cosmos7]

A LOT has changed recently with SB procedures.

That 9 months remaining on your lease thing is long gone.

Can you explain this... is the 1 year residency requirement gone now? What is the minimum residency period?

[SmokinMr2]

A year residency has not changed.

For a while, they required having 9 months left on a lease.
That meant not only living here a year but also showing you were going to be here an additional 9 months...
Those with month to month rental agreements were either out of luck or had to have a conversation with their landlord...

[ivsamhell]

Waste of effort...

impossible, if SBC is so good about carry they will change their policy based upon receiving this or they will refuse, either way its a good effort.

[gunsrfun]

excited to see some motion in the county, been a long two weeks.

http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...&id=0fe6f2c840

Can someone explain what this about. From what I read, some guy went an applied and didn't follow the directions and got mad. That can't be it can it?

[ivsamhell]

Can someone explain what this about. From what I read, some guy went an applied and didn't follow the directions and got mad. That can't be it can it?

My assumption is he tried to use the DOJ standard application instead of following san bernardinos rogue regulations.

[gunsrfun]

My assumption is he tried to use the DOJ standard application instead of following san bernardinos rogue regulations.

If you go on their website, the application you download is the state DOJ application. The county one is not even on their site.

[ivsamhell]

where? http://cms.sbcounty.gov/sheriff/CCWFAQ.aspx this is not the standard DOJ form, neither are the residence or employment history forms.

sorry, that is the doj form, I could have sworn the last time I looked at it it wasn't. The additional requirements are not: application instructions/employment history/residence history.

It would be near impossible for me to get together a thorough list of my employers and residences(with addresses and dates) in the required period. I've lived in SBC most my life; consecutively for the last 8 years, in that time I had utilities in my name for maybe three, and a rental agreement during one of those.

[jaymz]

It's not a wasted effort (I don't think), but I don't think it should be a top priority. Low hanging fruit maybe? While I don't like any of the extra crap that our SO has applicants do, they DO issue. I think there are far worse counties in CA that need to be poked with a sharp stick before SB.

[Paladin]

The San Bernardino sheriff can both get out of Birdt's lawsuit (about to go MSJ), and preempt a CGF lawsuit simply by just obeying the Constitution (Peruta), and the law. If he chooses not to, he has no one to blame for getting his a-- dragged into federal court other than himself!

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=932400&page=14

The clock is ticking and time is running out for him.