Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 AR pistol thread (master)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
1. If it does not meet the definition of an assault weapon, then it can not be registered as an assault weapon.
2. If it is self-marked per BATFE specifications, then it can be registered as a non-assault weapon before 07-01-2018.
3. If it is self-marked per BATFE specifications and it is not voluntarily registered as a non-assault weapon before 07-01-2018, then it must have CA DOJ marking info engraved on it before 01-01-2019. This process will register the firearm as a non-assault weapon.
4. If it complete and unmarked, then starting 07-01-2018, it must have CA DOJ marking info engraved on it before 01-01-2019. This process will register the firearm as a non-assault weapon.
5. If made after 06-30-2018, it must have CA DOJ marking info engraved on it. This process will register the firearm as a non-assault weapon.
6. Starting 01-01-2019, possession of an unregistered self-made/assembled (80%) firearm can be confiscated as evidence of violating CA home built firearm laws. It will also be illegal to transfer (sell, gift, etc) any self-made/assembled firearm in CA, unless it is to surrender it to law enforcement for destruction.Last edited by Quiet; 06-05-2018, 10:45 PM.sigpic
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).Comment
-
Great infoComment
-
Yes, it will also be illegal to transfer to a trust.
And CA home built firearm laws also makes it so everyone involved with a corporation/trust can be charged for illegal manfuacture/transfer of a self-made/assembled firearm.
Which would mean, if an unregistered 80% firearm is discovered by CA LEOs and it is said that the firearm is owned by a trust/corporation, then everyone listed on the trust/corporation can be charged for the illegal manfuacture of that firearm.
However... (because it can involve NFA trusts)
If an 80% firearm is legally made into a Title 2 AOW, then it would be CA legal. Even though it is not registered with CA DOJ, because the markings would be approved by BATFE. [PC 29181(a) and 11 CCR 5508(a)]Last edited by Quiet; 06-05-2018, 11:20 PM.sigpic
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).Comment
-
If I were to attempt to register an AR pistol built initially as a single shot from an 80% lower back in 2015, then later converted into a semi auto, would I be breaking any laws? If said pistol had a threaded barrel and was equipped with a bullet button?Comment
-
Not illegal at all because it wouldn’t be a transfer.Yes, it will also be illegal to transfer to a trust.
And CA home built firearm laws also makes it so everyone involved with a corporation/trust can be charged for illegal manfuacture/transfer of a self-made/assembled firearm.
Which would mean, if an unregistered 80% firearm is discovered by CA LEOs and it is said that the firearm is owned by a trust/corporation, then everyone listed on the trust/corporation can be charged for the illegal manfuacture of that firearm.
However... (because it can involve NFA trusts)
If an 80% firearm is legally made into a Title 2 AOW, then it would be CA legal. Even though it is not registered with CA DOJ, because the markings would be approved by BATFE. [PC 29181(a) and 11 CCR 5508(a)]
EDIT: I shouldn’t be so cavalier - yes, you’re right possibly illegal if the trust is improperly set up, I’m not sure. My wife is the lawyer who primarily does trusts and estate planning and I can’t recite all the ins and outs off the top of my head. In fact it’s something we’re working through right now. But I do believe gun trusts are still beneficial and can allow our home-built or otherwise “banned” family heirlooms are passed down for generations.Last edited by MWPatriot; 06-06-2018, 12:13 AM.Comment
-
AGAIN, a threaded barrel does not matter on an AR pistol.
- If you built it back in 2015, and would like to keep it in BBAW configuration, then my understanding is that you need to request a DOJ issued SN, have said number engraved on the firearm, then register as a BBAW before the deadline.
- If you have what is now defined as a fixed magazine, one which cannot be removed without the disassembly of the firearm's action, then the consensus seems to be that you can have the firearm engraved with a personal SN and then VolReg by 7/1/18.
Not sure if you're aware, but there are 2 types of registrations that have been discussed in this ginormous thread.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using TapatalkLast edited by zeroman03; 06-06-2018, 10:17 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
I feel a little bit bad for asking..but I'm not clear..but I think I might be.
80% built as an ar pistol with a bb 4 years ago and engraved per atf specs - now needs to be made "action open magazine release only" and then VOL reg?Beans and BulletsComment
-
Looking to see if anyone has any info on a scenario similar to below:
Bullet Button AR Pistol DROS'd in 2016 (not at 80%) built by local FFL
I understand that it would have had to been manufactured as single shot. Would the DROS form have single shot listed or would it display semi-auto if converted?Comment
-
Yes, DROS would say SSE roster exemption checked.Looking to see if anyone has any info on a scenario similar to below:
Bullet Button AR Pistol DROS'd in 2016 (not at 80%) built by local FFL
I understand that it would have had to been manufactured as single shot. Would the DROS form have single shot listed or would it display semi-auto if converted?Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,097
Posts: 25,153,478
Members: 357,208
Active Members: 4,715
Welcome to our newest member, muddywatters.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 19497 users online. 107 members and 19390 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment