why do so many come in here and BASH COPS

[Ron-Solo]

But they are in possession of law enforcement and movie studios, not common joes.

You are showing your lack of knowledge again.

[Ron-Solo]

[QUOTE=J-cat;2609128]But handhuns obtained afterward are not, are they.[/QUOTE


You are confusing the DROS procedure with registration. They are not the same thing.

[J-cat]

I ask because you keep boasting of your vast experience in search and seizure, but your info is mis-guided and inaccurate.

And you keep dodging the question....still

Based on your posts, I doubt you are a peace officer. You are definitely not a City Police Officer, Deputy Sheriff, or CHP. You answers show that very clearly.

To put it bluntly..........Put Up, or Shut Up.


If you'll notice, there are many other veteran officers and deputy sheriff's that are trying to explain to you that your information is incorrect.

Please, STOP THE MIS-INFORMATION[ before your advice gets someone in legal trouble.

I did not boast about my "vast" experience. You are mischaracterizing my previous posts. You are the one who challenged my credentials without addressing the argument. This is like the fifth time I asked you to address the argument, not the credentials.

If you haven't figured out what I do by now, you are not who you represent yourself to be.

[J-cat]

You are showing your lack of knowledge again.

So common Joes get to own silencers and machineguns? If so, then why do you get to detain them just by that virtue alone?

[Eroland7]

Maybe he mops the halls and takes out the trash at the Police Dept??

[J-cat]

Not everyone is like you.

[Eroland7]

good one...

[pummel]

J-cat

Sounds like with all the hints J-cat's throwing out, he's a Parole Agent.

[TRICKSTER]

Wow, are you capable of pointing out a mistake without hurling insults?

I don't know anything about gun laws? So my statement about AW being legal to possess at a public shooting range is incorrect?

I say you don't know anything about courteous interaction with other human beings.

Iggy is that you?

[J-cat]

You are a professional keyboard commando, no doubt.

[ST5MF]

Sonny and Cher

You LEO's fight like Sonny and Cher...

"Can't we all just get along?"

WTBS I think the "ask" an LEO thing is a "wash" at this point.

There are good and bad LEO's and there are certainly tons of "clowns" with a badge.

[yzErnie]

[Ron-Solo]

I did not boast about my "vast" experience. You are mischaracterizing my previous posts. You are the one who challenged my credentials without addressing the argument. This is like the fifth time I asked you to address the argument, not the credentials.

An other dodge...........imagine that. What are you hiding?

If you haven't figured out what I do by now, you are not who you represent yourself to be.

I prefer not to make guesses. I have my suspicions, but don't want to jump to conclusions or make assumptions.

As far as "addressing the argument" as you put it, I believe I have, several times. You have made several references to your "working the field" and your experience with search & seizure issues.

Once again.............Put Up, or Shut Up.

You keep making incorrect statements regarding the law and search & seizure issues and I don't want to see someone get in legal trouble from following your advice because you keep trying to pass yourself off as an expert based on your "field experience" as you put it.

[J-cat]

You have not. You said that AW's are illegal, therefore that is your RS. That is not an explanation. That is rephrasing the issue we're discussing.

Nobody is going to get into legal trouble. I did not excourage anyone to break the law or to disobey an order from a LEO.

As far as what I do, you still haven't figured it out? Are you serious? You're no cop.

This isn't a pissing contest about credentials.

[Curtis]

I know what you mean. I've visited several forums including this one where you are suppose to be able to ask a Cop a question, and receive an answer. Then, end of story. However after the question is posed, there will be a string of posts that begin with the sentence "I'm not LEO, but here's what I think. Or here's what I would do in that situation. Then when a bonified LEO does get an answer in, Someone will tell the LEO that he's wrong, or that's not what an LEO in a bar told him, or that he must be proud of himself for giving that answer, or that his answer won't hold up in court, and so forth and so on.


I wonder if Proctologists have such a forum where if a non-Proctologist asks a question, a bunch of forum members jump in and say: "I'm not a Proctologist, but here's how I would approach the situation. When a Proctologists does squeeze in an answer, someone counters with; "We'll I'd sue you then, Your are a disgrace to Proctology. You should not be in this line of work!"


Just wondering.

I'm an engineer and I face this situation all the time: we call it "Plan Check."