So as long as I complete the registration, keep them in a legal configuration, and don't bring illegal mags, I'm good? That's what I was thinking but before I do something potentially illegal, I had to ask.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Shot Exemption Explanation/Database Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Based on what I was told by the CA DOJ, that is correct. You can contact them to confirm that, but realize that you can get "alternate" answers.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
Yeah. I figured as much. I'll shoot them a call later and see if I can't get a letter stating its okay or something.Comment
-
-
In theory: yes.
In practice: usually yes.
What county? And was your gun properly DROS'ed?WTS all BNIB: Colt S70 Repro, HK45c, Gen4 G19Comment
-
-
Some departments refuse to allow you to have a firearm your CCW if it was transferred to you as a SSE. There is no law about this, so they can get away with it.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
One of my 3 listed on my CCW is a firearme I SSE'd because I liked the size, caliber, and safety features. Just so happens that it had been on the California Roster until 2009 and wasn't renewed (bought a new one in early 2011). I'd have no problem going toe-to-toe with the issuing department if they tried to say that just because I went through the SSE process to get a previously approved weapon, that I couldn't have it on my permit now. It would make no sense, in light of the fact I could have bought a used one (and was about to but decided on buying new) in a Face-to-Face PPT and no difference in weapons.
My 2 cents worth.
M
Comment
-
Listen guys... End of this year is the "convenient" dateline for acquiring firearms that do not have all the detrimental features CA is trying to force on us. The keywords here are convenient and acquiring.
Acquiring
If is perfectly legal for an off-roster handgun, that is not otherwise classified as an assault weapon, to be brought into the state of California by an out of state resident then kept in California. You can keep it if you become a California resident. It is just that no sale can occur to a California Resident within California and no transfer can occur to a California resident unless it is between family members. You can register it after it is imported. It is then transferable just like any gun you bought in CA 20 years ago before there is any such nonsense as a roster.
Convenient
Legally, if you want an off roster handgun you can become an Arizona resident, buy the gun in Arizona as an Arizonian, then bring it to CA and become Californian again and register the gun. The gun will be perfectly legal to retain in CA and will be transferable afterwards. To buy a gun in another state you'll need an address, a bill and a driver's license from that state -- none of which are difficult or illegal to obtain. It is just that 99% of people will find that too much of a hassle for the purpose of owning a particular handgun. But, if it is NOT too much trouble for you, it is entirely legal and entirely moral (IMHO) to switch state residency and back specifically for the purpose of getting a handgun your legislators want to ban. This is still a free country in the sense that you don't need just cause and/or anyone's permission to move from state to state be it for an hour or a decade.
Having said that, if the roster is not preventing you from getting your preferred weapon of choice. If all it is doing is preventing you from getting it without the detrimental features -- loaded chamber indicator (which may snag on clothing), magazine disconnect (which prevents you from firing the chambered round during a tactical reload) and microstamping (which marks shell casings either with the firing pin or chamber) -- feel free to modify and defeat those features after you buy the gun. Replacing the extractor, replacing the firing pin/barrel and/or pinning the disconnect are all perfectly legal. You just have to do it.Last edited by dwightlooi; 10-28-2014, 4:55 PM.Comment
-
Listen guys... End of this year is the "convenient" dateline for acquiring firearms that do not have all the detrimental features CA is trying to force on us. The keywords here are convenient and acquiring.
Acquiring
If is perfectly legal for an off-roster handgun, that is not otherwise classified as an assault weapon, to be brought into the state of California by an out of state resident then kept in California. You can keep it if you become a California resident. It is just that no sale can occur to a California Resident within California and no transfer can occur to a California resident unless it is between family members. You can register it after it is imported. It is then transferable just like any gun you bought in CA 20 years ago before there is any such nonsense as a roster.
Convenient
Legally, if you want an off roster handgun you can become an Arizona resident, buy the gun in Arizona as an Arizonian, then bring it to CA and become Californian again and register the gun. The gun will be perfectly legal to retain in CA and will be transferable afterwards. To buy a gun in another state you'll need an address, a bill and a driver's license from that state -- none of which are difficult or illegal to obtain. It is just that 99% of people will find that too much of a hassle for the purpose of owning a particular handgun. But, if it is NOT too much trouble for you, it is entirely legal and entirely moral (IMHO) to switch state residency and back specifically for the purpose of getting a handgun your legislators want to ban. This is still a free country in the sense that you don't need just cause and/or anyone's permission to move from state to state be it for an hour or a decade.
Having said that, if the roster is not preventing you from getting your preferred weapon of choice. If all it is doing is preventing you from getting it without the detrimental features -- loaded chamber indicator (which may snag on clothing), magazine disconnect (which prevents you from firing the chambered round during a tactical reload) and microstamping (which marks shell casings either with the firing pin or chamber) -- feel free to modify and defeat those features after you buy the gun. Replacing the extractor, replacing the firing pin/barrel and/or pinning the disconnect are all perfectly legal. You just have to do it.
If I had more energy I would argue a couple of your points.If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough. Albert EinsteinComment
-
Thinking about doing a few pistol builds before time runs out. AK or AR and 1911. I am pretty sure the AK and AR have to be marked, numbered and registered before January 1st when SSE ends.
Am I correct so far?
Not sure about the 1911 goes though.
Same deal as the AK/AR pistol build? Is it okay to build and register at anytime?
I'm not looking for a "legal guarantee". Just trying to get a better understanding of what is involved and if I need to make these builds a priority.Comment
-
Yep,
Everything being built from 80%ers. So the AK/AR build doesn't need to be 'on paper' either just build as a single shot before the end of the year?
Thought pistols had to be on paper?Comment
-
Anyone know the cheapest place to have a SSE/CA complaint AR pistol shipped to?
So far Rifle Gear at $60+$25+ sales tax is the best I can find for a out of state SSE ready transfer.
I'm in the HB/FV area. Trying to find the cheapest shop for the OTD price after fees.Comment
-
Last I checked rifle gear WILL NOT do SSE's for guns THEY do not order. Better call before you have it shipped.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,497
Posts: 25,144,956
Members: 357,024
Active Members: 4,390
Welcome to our newest member, Wynn52.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 13746 users online. 52 members and 13694 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment