Sacramento

[CSTactical]

I had my Sac CCW for 5 years before I moved to Sparks NV for two years. Received the NV CCW quick while living in Sparks.
Moved back to Sacramento for work, go to get my CCW and waited 28 days to get an approval. This is after being in good standing for 7 years in two states.

My GF, went for her first CCW, gets an approval the very next day. We both went in on the same day and hour apart from each other.

When I lived in Minden, NV for a short time. My CCW still took 60 days.

[Timthetwin]

Anyone know when weapon modifications will come back? I really want to add a gun to my permit

[kelsodeez]

I had my Sac CCW for 5 years before I moved to Sparks NV for two years. Received the NV CCW quick while living in Sparks.
Moved back to Sacramento for work, go to get my CCW and waited 28 days to get an approval. This is after being in good standing for 7 years in two states.

Did you have to go through the entire process again? Or was it like a renewal?

[igs]

January 2020 California State audit of Sacramento CCW program.

[egDonald]

January 2020 California State audit of Sacramento CCW program.

#11
Friggin' A.
This further demonstrates the State's bias; expressed hate for every common citizen with a firearm.


Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk

[Dvrjon]

January 2020 California State audit of Sacramento CCW program.

It's NOT a 2020 audit!

That audit was concluded in 2017 and included San Diego and Los Angeles counties. The results are available here.

Here's the full report.

It was discussed here.

Here's Sheriff Jones' response to the preliminary report in December 2017.

[igs]

It's NOT a 2020 audit!

Like everything else you post: WRONG

https://bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2019-041.pdf

[Dvrjon]

QFT

January 2020 California State audit of Sacramento CCW program. {Your data shot.}

It's NOT a 2020 audit!

That audit was concluded in 2017 and included San Diego and Los Angeles counties. The results are available here.
Here's the full report.
It was discussed here.
Here's Sheriff Jones' response to the preliminary report in December 2017.

Like everything else you post: WRONG
https://bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2019-041.pdf

Sir.

Thank you for posting your source and illustrating your ignorance.

The BSA document you posted as a

[igs]

That's an audit.

[Dvrjon]

That's an audit.

...my Office presents this special report

Yet, the transmittal letter for the original audit (2017-101) report says,

...the California State Auditor presents this audit report

8548.7 and 8548.9

[igs]

8548.7 and 8548.9 which direct a report, not an audit.

LOL do you even read your own links?

(b) The report shall clearly identify the state agency audited or investigated, the audit or investigation that contained the recommendation, a brief description of the recommendation, the date it was issued, and the most recent explanation provided by the agency to the State Auditor on the status of the recommendation.

[Dvrjon]

LOL do you even read your own links?

(b) The report shall clearly identify the state agency audited or investigated, the audit or investigation that contained the recommendation, a brief description of the recommendation, the date it was issued, and the most recent explanation provided by the agency to the State Auditor on the status of the recommendation.

The report shall clearly identify the state agency auditedreport (citations confirming this are above) which contains the results of past auditsRemember? Left column, bottom entry.)

Thanks for playing.

[igs]

...the California State Auditor presents this audit report

So is that an audit or a report. You seem confused.

roflmao

Thanks for playing.

[Dvrjon]

So is that an audit or a report.

Thanks for playing.

[igs]

I like how you can't answer then try to divert away from the question. Try again.