MERGED THREADS "Bullet Button Assault Weapon" Regs

[romadant]

Anyone who registers is out of their mind. We should make a huge push to encourage everyone to NOT register.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[1bulletBarney]

LOL! So, my guess is that if you "leave in" the bullet button so that the BB functions like a standard mag release, then you have a detachable magazine. However, if you use to drop a mag and remove it from the BB and attach it to the dust cover, then you do not have a detachable magazine.

However, when the cops show up and take it off your dust cover and put it in your BB, then you got "issues."

Yeah, I caught that little blurb about the mag magnet when I was reading through the reg. Best to leave that little bugger on or in the refrigerator...

[AKSOG]

Why would you register a real fixed mag AR? The purpose of registering is for detachable magazines including the original bullet button.

As bullet button by definition makes a rifle fixed magazine. New registration doesn't classify fixed magazine AW using BB type devices the same as non fixed magazine AW. The language appears to state that you are registering it as a fixed mag AW and it has to stay that way.

[Sousuke]

I'll probably register to see the results.

[JeepFiend]

Breathe.

Use the breath for cursing.

Don't type the cursing here.

Or better yet, breathe, pray for a conservative Supreme Court Justice that will aid in overruling these unconstitutional laws....or move. Mmmm, Texas!

[imarangemaster]

Yep, everyone should reuse to register so they can become a felon! That's really smart! (unless you run featureless, which is the only real alternative to registration.

[cyborg]

Could you imagine if EVERYONE in California who has an AR tried to register? DOJ would be completely overwhelmed --especially with the stupid pictures... We're talking potentially millions of ARs in this state, right?

That's what I was thinking. I can see them taking a month or two to get a "compliance letter" or whatever the F they call it into your hands. So in reality there would be only about an 8 month window to register in 2017. Don't get your letter by 12/31/17?...too bad.

[penguinman]

This makes sense... we're all safer with regulations that say a nutcase can't swap out their BB for a standard mag release before engaging in a mass shooting.

What's hilarious about this is that a disassembled AR-15 is not a "semiautomatic" firearm. So a criminal could have a complete free state lower and upper both in his possession, drive around with them in a separated configuration in his trunk, and not commit a felony until he assembles the weapon 15 seconds before he starts shooting.

[Sousuke]

As bullet button by definition makes a rifle fixed magazine. New registration doesn't classify fixed magazine AW using BB type devices the same as non fixed magazine AW. The language appears to state that you are registering it as a fixed mag AW and it has to stay that way.

I think thats their intention, but they are vague and don't actually say it.

[JeepFiend]

Anyone who registers is out of their mind. We should make a huge push to encourage everyone to NOT register.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep, I was on the register and be legal bandwagon for a while...now I'm like, "Screw those iceholes!" Gonna suck to be a cop in this state very soon.

[1911su16b870]

Absolutely unreasonable requirements put forth the the DOJ to the OAL.

Legally owned property, previously registered with the DOJ, and now an additional $15 per firearm, with photos and a computer required.

Section 5477 "The release mechanism for an ammuntion feeding device...shall not be changed..."

Trump that with SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! (Hopefully)

IMO there is no way all this will pass legal/judicial scrutiny.

[ifilef]

Nope, it should all be pretty straight forward. The website is up and there should be zero compliance for registering. Fixed mag or featureless and nothing more to aid them in the end game of confiscation

Online database re DROS records do exist for every darn long gun purchased eff. 1/1/2014.

[ifilef]

Absolutely unreasonable requirements put forth the the DOJ to the OAL.

Legally owned property, previously registered with the DOJ, and now an additional $15 per firearm, with photos and a computer required.

Section 5477 "The release mechanism for an ammuntion feeding device...shall not be changed..."

Trump that with SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! (Hopefully)

IMO there is no way all this will pass legal/judicial scrutiny.

Read, again, $15 total for all AW you have, plus $5 for the confirmation letter. Register all at the same time. $20 total.

[meno377]

Online database re DROS records do exist for every darn long gun purchased eff. 1/1/2014.

It doesn't specify how the rifle was delivered. I have several under that condition as they were delivered in pieces.

[tonyxcom]

Its $15 per person per transaction.
No limit to the number of assault weapons in a single transaction.

$5 is for a copy of original reg letter - I take that to mean if you request a replacement.