MERGED THREADS "Bullet Button Assault Weapon" Regs

[cyborg]

I see these similar threads are being merged. Good idea.

[DonFerrando]

Lol an "Assault Weapon" with magazine locking device. You can't make this stuff up.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

[Shadowdrop]

My previous post was buried with the thread merge. CA DOJ does not care their regulations overstep the law. They do not expect their regulations to be enforceable using the penal code. That's not the game they are playing. They hold the keys to the clubhouse and you either comply or no registration for you! Once we hit 2018, everyone else will be stuck holding unregistered AW's and now the penal code can be enforced against those gun owners.

[Plead the Second]

Why are people still talking about registering? With these regs there is absolutely zero carrot, all stick. Am I missing something???

You are missing the power of government in inducing fear, loss of jobs, loss of precious assorted "pensions," and loss of professional licenses for becoming a "felon" should a LEO encounter in a blue county with blue-voting and obedient order-following LEO lead to discovery of non-compliance and charges

[4x4Trooper]

Anyone else considering converting their BB rifles to non-rifle non-pistol configurations? No stock + 16" or greater barrel = regular pistol grip and mag release.

Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk

[ifilef]

I'm no lawyer, but as I read it...

"An AR-15 style firearm that has a bullet-button style magazine release with a magnet left on the bullet-button constitutes a detachable magazine."

"left" being the key word. In other words, you can be in possession of a magnet, you could use as a tool to remove a magazine, but if it is "left" in the firearm is constitutes a detachable magazine.

Okay. So, then what?

If already registered as AW I thought it could have a detachable magazine. This is all confusing. I don't understand the second paragraph hardly at all. I think she made some mistakes there in describing things. Doesn't make sense to me.

Moreover, I thought a BB is now considered a detachable magazine but by her definition it is NOT a detachable magazine.

Gee whiz, howdy-doody!

[calimayno]

Online database re DROS records do exist for every darn long gun purchased eff. 1/1/2014.

Fixed magazine still complies, just avoids registration

[Whiskey_Tango]

Okay. So, then what?

Are you gonna change your sig now?

[voit]

Its $15 per person per transaction.
No limit to the number of assault weapons in a single transaction.

$5 is for a copy of original reg letter - I take that to mean if you request a replacement.

DAMN! What a deal! Can I be first in line!!

[romadant]

They can suck my...

Plan B now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[veeklog]

NRA and CRPA have obtained the text of the proposed regs. An analysis of them will be coming shortly from our office.


California DOJ Proposes Regulations on "Bullet-Button Assault Weapons"

The California Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed proposed regulations on "Bullet Button Assault Weapons" with the Office of Administrative Law (OAL).

CRPA and NRA attorneys are currently reviewing the proposed regulations and will be providing a detailed analysis soon.

The regulations can be read here.

To ensure that you receive the most current information on these new regulations and are able to view the CRPA and NRA anaylsis as soon as it is available, please sign up for CRPA email alerts here and also visit CRPA.org regularly.

Thank you for standing with CRPA as we work to preserve the Second Amendment in California.

http://us5.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...=1cc78b331f&e=

Thank you Sean; please keep us apprised on what the new regulations are

[Whiskey_Tango]

You are missing the power of government in inducing fear, loss of jobs, loss of precious assorted "pensions," and loss of professional licenses for becoming a "felon" should a LEO encounter in a blue county with blue-voting and obedient order-following LEO lead to discovery of non-compliance and charges

Compliance is achievable without registration.

[colossians323]

I'm guessing nothing good will come of this.

Since the bullet button was created in order to comply with the prior AW ban, and now they've gotten around to reclassifying compliant rifles as non-compliant, what other purpose can they have but to further harass the law-abiding citizen who owns a lawful firearm?

So all the other laws that have gotten us here have been good?

[calimayno]

They can suck my...

Plan B now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Word

[cyborg]

My previous post was buried with the thread merge. CA DOJ does not care their regulations overstep the law. They do not expect their regulations to be enforceable using the penal code. That's not the game they are playing. They hold the keys to the clubhouse and you either comply or no registration for you! Once we hit 2018, everyone else will be stuck holding unregistered AW's and now the penal code can be enforced against those gun owners.

It all makes sense when you look at it that way...the underground regs and such. It takes a LEO like you to make it clear to us.