Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

CA DROS Delay

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pacrat
    I need a LIFE!!
    • May 2014
    • 10283

    Originally posted by johnctokalenko
    They refunded you everything you paid except the DO"J" extortion fee? I can't fault them on that, since the fee was taken by the pimp named Bonta. They should release, but their lawyers tell them that's "too much liability." On that, they have guilt.



    Yes, the extortion fee went to DOJ. "THAT'S THE LAW".

    Yes, the FFL SHOULD release. Because, "THAT'S THE LAW".

    Since the FFL was a dickhead that didn't follow the law as written. They chose to break the law, and the sales contract. THAT IS THE ONLY LIABILITY INVOLVED.

    BREACH OF CONTRACT.

    The "too much liability" crock of crap. Is not what any 2A knowledgeable attorney would tell a FFL client.

    THAT LIE WAS CREATED AND PROMUGATED BY KAMALA. In Jan of 2014. Becerra, and now Bonta, just let the lie stand, because it serves the purpose of their political agendas.

    Comment

    • johnctokalenko
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2022
      • 13

      Originally posted by LMan57
      So you had a Firearms Live Scan and it took only 5 days for the results, I had my Live Scan on the 29th of July and so far nothing when I check online ig get in Progress.

      Type Status
      CA Completed - 07/29/2022 - Response will be sent after Firearms is completed.
      Firearms In Progress

      I think I should call them again!
      I was advised to do a standard Record Review because of what you're encountering. I was only checking for "honest mistakes." There are none. Especially considering I've been approved for ammo four times during my wait, I figured there were no "honest" mistakes.

      The "Firearms Eligibility Check" is being deliberately delayed, to frustrate exercise of rights. That's pretty damn clear.

      I just got my FBI RAP sheet today, as well. No surprises, as expected.

      Comment

      • LMan57
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2013
        • 839

        Originally posted by johnctokalenko
        I was advised to do a standard Record Review because of what you're encountering. I was only checking for "honest mistakes." There are none. Especially considering I've been approved for ammo four times during my wait, I figured there were no "honest" mistakes.

        The "Firearms Eligibility Check" is being deliberately delayed, to frustrate exercise of rights. That's pretty damn clear.

        I just got my FBI RAP sheet today, as well. No surprises, as expected.
        Ok thanks.
        It's better to have and not need than to need and not have"

        Comment

        • johnctokalenko
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2022
          • 13

          Originally posted by pacrat

          Yes, the extortion fee went to DOJ. "THAT'S THE LAW".

          Yes, the FFL SHOULD release. Because, "THAT'S THE LAW".

          Since the FFL was a dickhead that didn't follow the law as written. They chose to break the law, and the sales contract. THAT IS THE ONLY LIABILITY INVOLVED.

          BREACH OF CONTRACT.

          The "too much liability" crock of crap. Is not what any 2A knowledgeable attorney would tell a FFL client.

          THAT LIE WAS CREATED AND PROMUGATED BY KAMALA. In Jan of 2014. Becerra, and now Bonta, just let the lie stand, because it serves the purpose of their political agendas.
          Much, most, or even all of the "liability" these corporate lawyers are referring to may be the liability to their own personal political agendas, that is, "the Second Amendment is an 'outrage'."

          If you have the time and patience for it, you could always look into small claims. Probably more trouble than it's worth, though - the judge will say you got your money back, so "what's the problem?"

          If you paid Turner's by credit card, you could always chargeback the DROS fee, but I have mixed feelings about that. A small consolation for your hassle and denial of rights.

          Comment

          • LMan57
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2013
            • 839

            Originally posted by johnctokalenko
            I was advised to do a standard Record Review because of what you're encountering. I was only checking for "honest mistakes." There are none. Especially considering I've been approved for ammo four times during my wait, I figured there were no "honest" mistakes.

            The "Firearms Eligibility Check" is being deliberately delayed, to frustrate exercise of rights. That's pretty damn clear.

            I just got my FBI RAP sheet today, as well. No surprises, as expected.
            Do you happen to know what ORI number of the form you submitted was this is way I will know if it's the same. I submitted two different one that was a record review CA0349435 and a Firearms Record Review ORI number AB165.
            It's better to have and not need than to need and not have"

            Comment

            • mrdd
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 2023

              Originally posted by pacrat
              Yes, the extortion fee went to DOJ. "THAT'S THE LAW".

              Yes, the FFL SHOULD release. Because, "THAT'S THE LAW".

              Since the FFL was a dickhead that didn't follow the law as written. They chose to break the law, and the sales contract. THAT IS THE ONLY LIABILITY INVOLVED.

              BREACH OF CONTRACT.

              The "too much liability" crock of crap. Is not what any 2A knowledgeable attorney would tell a FFL client.

              THAT LIE WAS CREATED AND PROMUGATED BY KAMALA. In Jan of 2014. Becerra, and now Bonta, just let the lie stand, because it serves the purpose of their political agendas.
              Originally posted by johnctokalenko
              Much, most, or even all of the "liability" these corporate lawyers are referring to may be the liability to their own personal political agendas, that is, "the Second Amendment is an 'outrage'."

              If you have the time and patience for it, you could always look into small claims. Probably more trouble than it's worth, though - the judge will say you got your money back, so "what's the problem?"

              If you paid Turner's by credit card, you could always chargeback the DROS fee, but I have mixed feelings about that. A small consolation for your hassle and denial of rights.
              @pacrat is correct. You should get the item that you paid for. If you wanted to keep the money, you wouldn't have even gone to the store!

              Comment

              • johnctokalenko
                Junior Member
                • Sep 2022
                • 13

                Originally posted by LMan57
                Do you happen to know what ORI number of the form you submitted was this is way I will know if it's the same.
                I do not, sorry.

                Comment

                • johnctokalenko
                  Junior Member
                  • Sep 2022
                  • 13

                  Originally posted by mrdd
                  @pacrat is correct. You should get the item that you paid for. If you wanted to keep the money, you wouldn't have even gone to the store!
                  OF COURSE you should! OF COURSE, none of this legalistic BS should be happening, either - "shall not be infringed." But the real-world reality is much different.

                  Comment

                  • pacrat
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • May 2014
                    • 10283

                    Originally posted by johnctokalenko
                    OF COURSE you should! OF COURSE, none of this legalistic BS should be happening, either - "shall not be infringed." But the real-world reality is much different.


                    ^^^ FIFY ^^^

                    Ca DOJ is CORRUPT TO THE CORE. They tell FFLs they only have to follow the law, "if they want to".

                    Then protect the FFL by refusing to hold them legally accountable for breaking the law.

                    Comment

                    • johnctokalenko
                      Junior Member
                      • Sep 2022
                      • 13

                      Originally posted by pacrat
                      ^^^ FIFY ^^^

                      Ca DOJ is CORRUPT TO THE CORE. They tell FFLs they only have to follow the law, "if they want to".

                      Then protect the FFL by refusing to hold them legally accountable for breaking the law.
                      The California "government" - especially the Department of "Justice" - is ran by committed apparatchiks opposed to the very concept of self-defense, especially against them, provided for in the Second Amendment. So none of what's happening should be surprising.

                      Comment

                      • Nick Adams
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 1329

                        I was able to purchase some ammo today, no problem. Just after coming up “undetermined” for a gun purchase. Go figure.

                        Comment

                        • LMan57
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2013
                          • 839

                          I think they just randomly pick someone to screw with.
                          It's better to have and not need than to need and not have"

                          Comment

                          • townbound
                            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 264

                            Originally posted by LMan57
                            I think they just randomly pick someone to screw with.
                            I totally agree with that. There is no rhyme or reason for me to be delayed. It's been 2 times in a row so far. I have PPT I'm supposed to pick up Monday, I guess I'll see what happens with that.
                            sigpicI shoot Targets and Movies.

                            Comment

                            • johnctokalenko
                              Junior Member
                              • Sep 2022
                              • 13

                              Demonstrating that the Department of "Justice" is either woefully incompetent and/or weaponizing "the law" against Americans.

                              Good for ammo = good for guns

                              Comment

                              • Creative300
                                Junior Member
                                • Jun 2022
                                • 73

                                Originally posted by johnctokalenko
                                Demonstrating that the Department of "Justice" is either woefully incompetent and/or weaponizing "the law" against Americans.

                                Good for ammo = good for guns
                                Except there is no law that allows the Dept of Injustice to delay and delay for no apparent reason, not even attempting to give you any reason for your delay. A government agency that doesn't bother to follow it's own laws is the very definition of corruption.


                                If they can't do their job and provide you with a definitive answer (approved or denied) which is what you paid them to do then the very least they should do is refund you your DROS fee back, because you didn't get what you paid for. Otherwise it is nothing but outright theft.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1