Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional reactions culled from the case thread in Litigation
Collapse
X
-
-
Because that was my experience, you stop posting. And at this time they are out of 10 pak Magpul. And I'm at a Rest Stop near Los Banos, sending these text while the auto pilot is on.Last edited by tony270; 04-01-2019, 4:05 PM.Comment
-
Active Army 1976-1986, Army Reserve 2005-2015, Afghanistan 2010-2011
http://www.thepolemicist.net/2013/01...t-for-gun.html
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Comment
-
The ninth circus will likely end the mag buying party. At a minimum until they make a ruling so him keeping that party going is a bigger thumb in the eye. Let's see a few million SCMs or even drums ship legally into California and watch Newsome and the Giffords layers go on an apology tour for allowing this to happen.Comment
-
What about us Folks in Oakland, San Francisco and Sunnyvale? There are local ordinances for banning High Caps, I searched and wikipedia states that In San Francisco and in Sunnyvale is not enforceable due to Federal Ruling? Anyone got any insight on this issue? Thanks!Comment
-
Those laws and their enforceability are unchanged by this ruling. Different laws, different parties. Even if someone sued to invalidate one of those laws, and came in waving this order, it would only be persuasive, not precedential, law.Comment
-
Yes and no. In strict terms, the judge only enjoined enforcement of 32310. He did not enjoin local ordinances. So... local ordinances are still in play. If you were tried for violating the local ordinance, I would imagine your defense would use this ruling as a reason why the local ordinances are unenforceable. Of course, your trial would likely be postponed due to an appeal to the 9CA, and if the 9Ca overturns the ruling, you're back in trouble.
If there's a local ordinance, you'd best wait.Comment
-
.
Here is a link for Law of Self Defense. Andrew Branca is an attorney specializing in "use-of-force-law" rather than "gun law." His written blog also includes a 30-minute video commentary and breakdown of the Duncan case. It is as follows:
I believe that the blog is available going forward. However, I believe the video included is only available for the first 24 hours and is then behind a Patreon (or similar) wall.
Good insight.Comment
-
There it is, let's read it quick.Originally posted by doggieSomeone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth."The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. BenitezOriginally posted by PMACA_MFGNot checkers, not chess, its Jenga.


Comment
-
I personally like the argument about the "Strong likelihood of prevailing" being made to the Judge that just wrote his 85 page opinion about why he is wrong.Comment
-
I could not find the actual appeal.Comment
-
Les Baer 1911: Premier II w/1.5" Guarantee, Blued, No FCS, Combat Rear, F/O Front, Checkered MSH & SA Professional Double Diamond Grips
Springfield Armory XD-45 4" Service Model
Springfield Armory XD9 4" Service Model (wifes).
M&P 15 (Mine)Comment
-
Every single pinned mag was drilled out over this weekend.
Acquiring and manufacturing these mags was 100% legal.
Every single magazine manufactured in the last 20 years just became california legal.Comment
-
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,628
Posts: 25,147,134
Members: 357,024
Active Members: 4,430
Welcome to our newest member, Wynn52.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 39453 users online. 105 members and 39348 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment