Additional reactions culled from the case thread in Litigation

[Hopi]

Thank you!

[GMONEY]

AMAZING!

[aBrowningfan]

Complete win in NRA & CRPA supported "large capacity magazine" case!

81-page opinion:

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Duncan-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Congrats on the win, but now it will head to the 9th Circus where it will be overturned. Hopefully the ruling at the 9th Circus will be stayed pending appeal to SCotUS. So frustrating.

[Someday]

Wow! Congratulations!

[MyOdessa]

Congratulations and thank you for an excellent job defending Second Amendment.

[SAD338]

Oh, what a day, what a lovely day!

[mshill]

Thank you NRA, CRPA and especially Judge Benitez for standing up as a constitutionalist and reading Heller as it was intended. The 9th Circuit better be very careful how they treat this with the current make up of SCOTUS and the possibility of a Trump re-election.

If I read this correctly, the whole of the 32310 is unconstitutional. I'm sure the state will ask for a (reverse?) injunction while they appeal to the 9th circus.

[DrJeds44]

So purchasing and owning hi caps in CA is now legal?

[tonyxcom]

Unless I missed something, the whole PC section that covers large capacity magazines has been ruled to be unconstitutional. Including importation.

It would seem that there will be a flow of folks from CA headed to states that border CA to purchase large capacity magazines until the ruling is stayed.

I have work in Oregon next weekend too.

[DrJeds44]

For the moment, until CA-DoJ can get the 9th Circus to stay the order.

The Ninth circuit already declined to hear this case

[aBrowningfan]

The Ninth circuit already declined to hear this case

I believe they declined to hear the CA-DoJ appeal of the preliminary injunction, not the ruling, which just issued.

[ColdDeadHands1]

Doe this mean I shouldn't have turned in all of my standard capacity magazines to the PD last year?

[DrJeds44]

Complete win in NRA & CRPA supported "large capacity magazine" case!

81-page opinion:

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Duncan-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

I believe they declined to hear the CA-DoJ appeal of the preliminary injunction, not the ruling, which just issued.

Complete win means the case is complete unless this is hyperbol.

[Syntax Error]

Give me a rundown - what can and can we not do legally with this ruling in place? I'm hearing conflicting things.

1. Can we now legally purchase standard capacity magazines from out of state?
2. Or is the ruling only pertaining to legally-possessed standard capacity magazines prior to the recent magazine ban which the Federal injunction applied to?
3. What can we do with our legally-blocked 10 round magazines?

[John Browning]

Gun owners: Treat this like Gay marriage. BUY BUY BUY.

Thanks Gavin!

Seriously though, what does this mean in practice? Can we buy until/unless an injunction is issued by the 9th?