San Bernardino

[morrcarr67]

From your perspective I would certainly agree. But by and large it looks like things are speeding up a little bit. I can certainly sympathize with you, but maybe there was some stupid hitch in your BG check... another person with the same or similar name and DOB perhaps?

There used to be (maybe there still is) another guy with my first and last name (different middle) and we were born one year and one day apart. My name isn't too common and there was twice in my youth I almost went to jail on his warrants! In all fairness I was pretty irresponsible back then and he may have been jailed on one of mine.

If there is some one else with my name I'm probably helping him out.

I'm prior military with a mid level security clearance and I've held an FFL for years.

My brother interviewed 8/8 and is also prior military. He did have a security clearance but he served 17 years while I only did my 4. It took just as long for his to come in as he was called on Tuesday.

I really think it is just a luck of the draw.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00TD using Tapatalk

[ACfixer]

I really think it is just a luck of the draw.

Well I'm glad you got called anyway, you can see a light at the end of the tunnel.

[Cokebottle]

That's why I'm wearing my avatar T-shirt. I've been around this forum for awhile and I bet most people have seen it at least once. It should make it easy for other CGer's to spot me.

Plus I enjoy being that guy that makes people look twice. 😎

You may end up being used as an example of how not to dress to be the "gray man"

I'll wear a Magpul or Kimber hat and that's about it.

[morrcarr67]

You may end up being used as an example of how not to dress to be the "gray man"

I'll wear a Magpul or Kimber hat and that's about it.

Well seeing as you put it that way; maybe I'll wear something different.

[ACfixer]

Class was a breeze... Informative on Cal and Fed law, a couple things I didn't know and I'm glad I do now, mostly along the lines of transporting a loaded firearm in a vehicle and if it isn't "on your person" then the old rules still apply. It was an honor to attend the last Apple Valley class with Capt. Marhoefer. Got to sit by and briefly meet fellow Calgunner jmysk as well.

Qualifying is a snap. There was a little snafu with a stiff safety on my 1911, but we worked through it. There were a couple folks that struggled a bit, but they got them through it.

[morrcarr67]

Class was a breeze... Informative on Cal and Fed law, a couple things I didn't know and I'm glad I do now, mostly along the lines of transporting a loaded firearm in a vehicle and if it isn't "on your person" then the old rules still apply. It was an honor to attend the last Apple Valley class with Capt. Marhoefer. Got to sit by and briefly meet fellow Calgunner jmysk as well.

Qualifying is a snap. There was a little snafu with a stiff safety on my 1911, but we worked through it. There were a couple folks that struggled a bit, but they got them through it.

Sweet! It's always good to learn something new.

Sent from my P00C using Tapatalk

[Cokebottle]

Well seeing as you put it that way; maybe I'll wear something different.

Haha... Maybe something like this?

[Cokebottle]

along the lines of transporting a loaded firearm in a vehicle and if it isn't "on your person" then the old rules still apply.

That is one of the things that makes the 3-gun limit a pain in CA.

If we were limited to 6, or unlimited (most states don't even list, you qualify for pistol, revolver, or simply "handgun") then it would not be a big deal for me to have "my 3" and my wife to have "her 3" and then when we are the only people in a vehicle, transport is NBD.
Likewise, if she wants me to watch her purse while going into the ladies' room, again, no problem.

But limited to 3, we would have to "waste" one of our precious 3 for their primary, and if either is carrying secondary, then it's back to having to change procedure.

[morrcarr67]

Haha... Maybe something like this?

😂😂😂

Now I have to do some shopping.

Sent from my P00C using Tapatalk

[maidenrules29]

Well......I had a hard time getting a hold of the Detective who called me and left me a message to schedule my 4/15 date so unfortunately my date is now 4/22 🙁

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

[maidenrules29]

Still a lot sooner than I expected seeing as how my interview was 11/22

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

[Quiet]

I'm sorry, could you clarify what you refer to when you say "old rules still apply."

AFAIK...

As a valid carry permit holder, if it is not on you and you are the only person in the vehicle, then it needs to be concealed.
There are no requirements for it to be unloaded and in a locked container, because you are the sole occupant and have a valid carry permit for the handgun.

As a valid carry permit holder, if it is not on you and other people are in the vehicle, then it needs to be unloaded and in a locked container.
Since you are not in possession of the handgun, the other occupants of the vehicle can be charged with illegal conceal carry in a vehicle [PC 25400(a)(3)] and/or possessing loaded firearm in a vehicle in public [PC 25850(a)].

[9mm man]

Application 12/15
Interview 8/16
Range call and said I passed BG 2/17
Range scheduled 3/17
Approximately 15 months start to finish!

[morrcarr67]

Application 12/15
Interview 8/16
Range call and said I passed BG 2/17
Range scheduled 3/17
Approximately 15 months start to finish!

So they're going to call you in 5 days to tell you that you passed the background check?

Sent from my ASUS_Z00TD using Tapatalk

[Randycollins26]

Lol