Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Thug gets a slug !

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ja308
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Nov 2009
    • 12660

    I’ve noticed some calgunners have objected to the blunt thread title .
    Thug gets a slug. Other titles came to mind so CGrs offended now have a choice.
    Please let me know, so next time I will be more correct.

    1 perp takes a pill
    2 predator absorbs projectile
    3 creep takes a cap
    4Loser ingested lead
    Sorry Markeis you asked for this by showing off !

    Comment

    • heidad01
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 4902

      ^^^
      They are all correct in one or more ways. Add this one.

      5- Hoodlum gained 115 grains (precisely 64.79891 milligrams) and collapsed.

      Comment

      • ja308
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Nov 2009
        • 12660

        Originally posted by heidad01
        ^^^
        They are all correct in one or more ways. Add this one.

        5- Hoodlum gained 115 grains (precisely 64.79891 milligrams) and collapsed.
        ^5

        Comment

        • God Bless America
          Calguns Addict
          • May 2014
          • 5165

          Originally posted by IVC
          Didn't you just say that his past didn't matter?
          No.

          Comment

          • God Bless America
            Calguns Addict
            • May 2014
            • 5165

            Originally posted by ja308
            Sorry Markeis you asked for this by showing off !
            Not a justification to kill somebody.

            Life is not a Charles Bronson movie.

            Comment

            • BTFlyer
              Member
              • Jun 2017
              • 233

              Originally posted by God Bless America
              His life was in no danger and there is no evidence that it was. McGlockton never killed anybody.
              His life was in no danger? You don't think sucker punching a stranger in the head so they fall and hit a hard surface is not putting someone's life in danger?

              You are right that he never killed anybody...now he never will 100% for sure

              Comment

              • ja308
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Nov 2009
                • 12660

                Do those who think (feel) McGlocton did not deserve to get drilled for sucker shoving a citisen think these knockout game players should not meet the same fate ?



                For those who think McGlockton was a lone incident read the Colin Flaherty book. I did and it covers very troubling incidents completely overlooked and not reported by the democrat controlled media sources .
                Last edited by ja308; 07-29-2018, 8:10 AM.

                Comment

                • God Bless America
                  Calguns Addict
                  • May 2014
                  • 5165

                  Originally posted by BTFlyer
                  His life was in no danger? You don't think sucker punching a stranger in the head so they fall and hit a hard surface is not putting someone's life in danger?
                  Now I really wonder if we're are watching the same video.

                  McGlockton didn't hit anybody, and Drejka's head never hit the ground.

                  You are right that he never killed anybody...now he never will 100% for sure
                  We are not allowed to kill people because we think they might kill somebody in the future. And that is certainly not the idea behind CCW.

                  Comment

                  • God Bless America
                    Calguns Addict
                    • May 2014
                    • 5165

                    Originally posted by ja308
                    Do those who think (feel) McGlocton did not deserve to get drilled for sucker shoving a citisen think these knockout game players should not meet the same fate ?
                    That's it right there. You believe Drejka was entitled to kill McGlockton for a shove.

                    That is not self-defense, not "stand-your-ground", but vigilantism. Which is murder.

                    It only took 6 pages for you to finally state it.

                    Comment

                    • TriumphantApe
                      Member
                      • Aug 2016
                      • 101

                      If the guy had shot 3 seconds sooner you wouldn't be having this debate.

                      Comment

                      • ja308
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 12660

                        Originally posted by God Bless America
                        That's it right there. You believe Drejka was entitled to kill McGlockton for a shove.

                        That is not self-defense, not "stand-your-ground", but vigilantism. Which is murder.

                        It only took 6 pages for you to finally state it.
                        Correct I believe a person should take a bullet,blade,cane or any other weapon for violently assaulting another without any provocation.

                        Now please address the knockout game where big city animals preyed on the unsuspecting,just like McGlocton did. I provided links for your convenience.

                        Comment

                        • ja308
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 12660

                          Originally posted by TriumphantApe
                          If the guy had shot 3 seconds sooner you wouldn't be having this debate.
                          No some of our friends are saying a shove or punch doesn't deserve a death sentence regardless of circumstances.

                          Comment

                          • Win231
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2015
                            • 2099

                            Originally posted by God Bless America
                            Now I really wonder if we're are watching the same video.

                            McGlockton didn't hit anybody, and Drejka's head never hit the ground.



                            We are not allowed to kill people because we think they might kill somebody in the future. And that is certainly not the idea behind CCW.
                            You are obviously mistaken, since he wasn't charged with anything.

                            Comment

                            • God Bless America
                              Calguns Addict
                              • May 2014
                              • 5165

                              Originally posted by ja308
                              Now please address the knockout game where big city animals preyed on the unsuspecting,just like McGlocton did. I provided links for your convenience.
                              McGlockton was not playing the knockout game. He was not 'preying upon the unsuspecting.' Drejka brought the parties together. Drejka started the personal interaction. McGlockton likely would never have given Drejka a second thought if Drejka had minded his own business and not been harassing the GF.

                              Comment

                              • heidad01
                                Veteran Member
                                • Feb 2012
                                • 4902

                                Originally posted by God Bless America
                                Now I really wonder if we're are watching the same video.

                                McGlockton didn't hit anybody, and Drejka's head never hit the ground.

                                We are not allowed to kill people because we think they might kill somebody in the future. And that is certainly not the idea behind CCW.
                                That is not entirely correct.

                                There are many circumstances where you are allowed to use deadly force if you fear for your life or the life of others. That has nothing to do with what we think on a forum. It all depends on the circumstances and how/if the person attacked fears for his life or the life of others, and/or if a reasonable man would believe not using such force will cause death or great bodily harm to him or others. Now, That holds even in places like California.

                                Secondly, sucker punching people or violently pushing older folks to the ground can easily cause death. Here is a recent example. Some cholo sucker punched a retired sherrif deputy. He fell to the ground and died.



                                We are now feeding and housing that cholo scum bag at tax payers expense. I really wished that retired officer would have had a few more seconds to shoot that vermin. That would have been good riddance and a favor to society.
                                Last edited by heidad01; 07-29-2018, 12:01 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1