Like drifts1 said - he's not getting it "for free". He's getting it at the price he was told to pay, the stated price.
This fact AND for the fact that it was the lower price that sold him on the purchase. He even said up front he was indifferent and noncommittal to buying one until she implored several times that the price she was giving him was indeed the price. So he jumped at the bait.
Ironically.... this thread alone - with as many gun owning consumers chiming in to see what will be the result - should be reason enough for Turners to honor the deal. Say it was a mistake, yes, that it was not the correct price - sure - but honor it. They have more to lose here from just the number of people having read this thread that the difference on what they sold this single firearm.
And another point: it was the correct price when they sold it, as noted, but only become a "mistake" long after the fact.
Honor it.
This fact AND for the fact that it was the lower price that sold him on the purchase. He even said up front he was indifferent and noncommittal to buying one until she implored several times that the price she was giving him was indeed the price. So he jumped at the bait.

Ironically.... this thread alone - with as many gun owning consumers chiming in to see what will be the result - should be reason enough for Turners to honor the deal. Say it was a mistake, yes, that it was not the correct price - sure - but honor it. They have more to lose here from just the number of people having read this thread that the difference on what they sold this single firearm.
And another point: it was the correct price when they sold it, as noted, but only become a "mistake" long after the fact.
Honor it.



Comment