Los Angeles

[Rich6863]

Thought I'd chime in since I just got the call.

GC Maybe yellow to light green
6/7/2021 Mailed app and check
6/30/2021 Checked cashed
1/6/2022 Call from Private # to setup interview
1/13/2022 Interview Scheduled

Let's see how far I get. Yellow is more because of my wife than me.

Congratulations

[Stevo818]

Re-elect Los Angeles County Sheriff Villanueva!

Campaign Site: https://alexvillanueva.org/
Volunteer Form: https://alexvillanueva.org/get-involved









Picked up!

[JerryPlissman]

checking in.

[JerryPlissman]

Checking in.

Checking in. Hope everyone had a great Xmas and New Year.

[LA County Calgunner]

Do you guys think renewals will be easy once we get our initial permit?

[REDHORSE]

Picked up!

Sweet! Congrats!

[RoundEye]

Do you guys think renewals will be easy once we get our initial permit?

I like it, already planning ahead. A lot will depend on who the Sheriff is at the time...

[Gnzrme]

Do you guys think renewals will be easy once we get our initial permit?

I hope so....

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[MajorCaliber]

Do you guys think renewals will be easy once we get our initial permit?

Well, at first blush there's good news and bad news.

Good news: By the time any recent permittees are ready to renew, I fully expect SCOTUS will have ruled that any kind of subjective GC requirement is unconstitutional, so that will alleviate the time and effort required to validate and evaluate GC statements.

Bad News: There will be an absolute flood of new applicants that will completely overwhelm LASO's existing systems.

It would not surprise me at all that SCOTUS takes it a step further and rules that states must permit at least one form of carry with no permit at all. (For instance NV requires a permit for concealed carry but none for open carry.) it is less clear how that would play out in CA.

[RooftopDefender]

Well, at first blush there's good news and bad news.

Good news: By the time any recent permittees are ready to renew, I fully expect SCOTUS will have ruled that any kind of subjective GC requirement is unconstitutional, so that will alleviate the time and effort required to validate and evaluate GC statements.

Bad News: There will be an absolute flood of new applicants that will completely overwhelm LASO's existing systems.

It would not surprise me at all that SCOTUS takes it a step further and rules that states must permit at least one form of carry with no permit at all. (For instance NV requires a permit for concealed carry but none for open carry.) it is less clear how that would play out in CA.

If SCOTUS rules in our favor, then all the local police departments will require to issue CCW permits in their own cities as well. Therefore LASD will unload other cities applications to focus on LACO residents only.

[MajorCaliber]

If SCOTUS rules in our favor, then all the local police departments will require to issue CCW permits in their own cities as well. Therefore LASD will unload other cities applications to focus on LACO residents only.

If we get a ruling in our favor, I think the STATE will have to figure out how to comply. I don't see any particular reason that they will then require cities to issue individually. They might, but I doubt it for a variety of reasons. Actually, if you take out the subjective tests like GMC and GC, there is no logical reason it would have to be done by law enforcement at all. It could be done at the DMV. Heck, it could actually just be a field on your actual DL like the organ donor designation, no need for a separate card at all, but I doubt that would happen either. It would make too much sense.

[spurshooter]

Torrance resident

Hi folks. I'm a Torrance resident. I found some inference posted that Torrance residents have to go thru the TPD. Is this accurate or can I go directly thru the LASD?

[awiner]

Hi folks. I'm a Torrance resident. I found some inference posted that Torrance residents have to go thru the TPD. Is this accurate or can I go directly thru the LASD?

Anyone that resides in LA County can now apply directly to LASD.

[stoogescv]

Well, at first blush there's good news and bad news.

Good news: By the time any recent permittees are ready to renew, I fully expect SCOTUS will have ruled that any kind of subjective GC requirement is unconstitutional, so that will alleviate the time and effort required to validate and evaluate GC statements.

Bad News: There will be an absolute flood of new applicants that will completely overwhelm LASO's existing systems.

It would not surprise me at all that SCOTUS takes it a step further and rules that states must permit at least one form of carry with no permit at all. (For instance NV requires a permit for concealed carry but none for open carry.) it is less clear how that would play out in CA.

If I were on the Supreme Court, I would rule:
1. NY (and every other state) that has a "good cause" requirement must accept "exercise of my fundamental right to self defense" as sufficient good cause and issue a CCW permit.
2. Every state west of the Mississippi River is part of the Old West, and for reasons of history and tradition, must permit open carry of a pair of Single-Action Army revolvers in an Old West-style double holster.
3. Bartenders can require open carriers to hand over their guns at the bar until they leave.
4. Bartenders must keep a side-by-side shotgun behind the bar.
5. Bars must have dancing girls in Can-Can costumes sitting and talking to bar customers.
6. At least once per hour, the girls must all get up on the bar and do a Can-Can dance.

[thethreegs]

N/A