Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

San Diego CCW

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MajorCaliber
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2014
    • 1018

    Originally posted by Fizz
    I have an email out to SDSO but.... has anyone removed a firearm from their license without replacing it? Are there fees/appointment waiting periods involved?
    I hate it when I ask a question (How do I do X) and instead of answering the question I asked, I get all sorts of responses about why I should do Z instead, or wanting to know why I want to do X in the first place.

    And now I'm about to do that exact same thing. CalGuns gods forgive me.

    What purpose is there in removing one from your permit? There is no disadvantage I can see to keeping it on, even if you no longer own it. Removing it will cost you some sort of modification fee and take your time and SDSO's time. You will probably have to get into the queue to get the new permit. But the literal answer to your question is I have never done it and I have never heard of anyone else doing it.
    I wish today's liberals could understand: You cannot be generous by giving away other peoples' money and you cannot demonstrate your virtue by your willingness to give up other peoples' rights.

    The more time I spend on this forum, the more sense kcbrown makes.

    Comment

    • birdman81
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 81

      [QUOTE=MajorCaliber;
      What purpose is there in removing one from your permit? There is no disadvantage I can see to keeping it on, even if you no longer own it. Removing it will cost you some sort of modification fee and take your time and SDSO's time. You will probably have to get into the queue to get the new permit. But the literal answer to your question is I have never done it and I have never heard of anyone else doing it.[/QUOTE]

      Comment

      • Fizz
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 1473

        Originally posted by MajorCaliber
        I hate it when I ask a question (How do I do X) and instead of answering the question I asked, I get all sorts of responses about why I should do Z instead, or wanting to know why I want to do X in the first place.

        And now I'm about to do that exact same thing. CalGuns gods forgive me.

        What purpose is there in removing one from your permit? There is no disadvantage I can see to keeping it on, even if you no longer own it. Removing it will cost you some sort of modification fee and take your time and SDSO's time. You will probably have to get into the queue to get the new permit. But the literal answer to your question is I have never done it and I have never heard of anyone else doing it.
        Should probably remove guns from your permit you're going to sell, which is my plan.

        You don't want your serial to come up on record during some criminal investigation or theft. There's just no benefit to you and all down sides.

        Comment

        • xd99problems
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2021
          • 59

          Updated Timeline:
          • The application turned in: 5/18/2021
          • Original Appt:Sometime in 2022(forgot exact date)
          • Watched Permitium like a hawk and was able to move my Appt to 11/15/21
          • Mid-July, Able to move appt due to cancellation
          • "Interview": 8/19/2021


          Today's "interview" went well, Staff at the CCW office were great! I was not asked to revise anything or update my GC statement, only went over paperwork and signed a few things. Before today, I was not asked for additional information/supporting documents. I was extremely thorough and uploaded all supporting documentation for my GC statement when I first applied. I took my pictures and my livescan. I'm not sure if it is a comment made to all applicants or a good sign, but it was recommended that I look for certified trainers and I would be notified in 90 days of their decision.

          Also, I asked if they had expanded their team to process applications. The young lady who processed my paperwork advised that they now have a bigger team to process CCW applications. Employees who were working on other permits in the past now help the CCW team.
          Last edited by xd99problems; 08-19-2021, 4:46 PM.

          Comment

          • powersx
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2020
            • 54

            Originally posted by macmatthew
            Thats crazy, you're the first person I've seen take longer than 90 days. Im at 89 right now, we'll see how it goes.
            Did you hear back by day 90?

            Comment

            • macmatthew
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2019
              • 98

              Originally posted by powersx
              Did you hear back by day 90?
              Just recieved approval this morning on day 91. Maybe they start counting the days starting after your interview though so it could be day 90. Have you heard back yet?

              Comment

              • powersx
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2020
                • 54

                Originally posted by macmatthew
                Just recieved approval this morning on day 91. Maybe they start counting the days starting after your interview though so it could be day 90. Have you heard back yet?
                Nope, still waiting on DOJ apparently

                Comment

                • powersx
                  Junior Member
                  • Nov 2020
                  • 54

                  Well, I reached out and asked for my ATI and then checked it.

                  “Applicant Transaction Not Found.
                  Please Contact the Agency that Requested the Background Check.”

                  Confirmed with records that the ATI I was provided and checked was correct. They’re going to follow up with the DOJ today as there are several other missing fingerprint results.

                  Comment

                  • trustno12373
                    Member
                    • Aug 2020
                    • 117

                    This may be a little off topic and this may not be the right group for this question.

                    I am thinking about changing the stock trigger on my Smith and Wesson M&P Shield 1.0 with the Hyve Technologies Monarch trigger. Does anyone know if this would violate any policies for San Diego
                    County Sheriffs department, since this is one of my carry guns.

                    The trigger swap does not alter the trigger pull in any way. I also emailed the CCW unit, but have not received a response as of yet.


                    **This will only fit the Smith & Wesson Shield 9mm, .40, .45** **This will not work with the 2.0** **This will not work with performance center** This product is made 100% in the USA As Trigger…


                    Can anyone share their thoughts or experiences with these kinds of modifications?


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • powersx
                      Junior Member
                      • Nov 2020
                      • 54

                      Originally posted by trustno12373
                      This may be a little off topic and this may not be the right group for this question.

                      I am thinking about changing the stock trigger on my Smith and Wesson M&P Shield 1.0 with the Hyve Technologies Monarch trigger. Does anyone know if this would violate any policies for San Diego
                      County Sheriffs department, since this is one of my carry guns.

                      The trigger swap does not alter the trigger pull in any way. I also emailed the CCW unit, but have not received a response as of yet.


                      **This will only fit the Smith & Wesson Shield 9mm, .40, .45** **This will not work with the 2.0** **This will not work with performance center** This product is made 100% in the USA As Trigger…


                      Can anyone share their thoughts or experiences with these kinds of modifications?


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • trustno12373
                        Member
                        • Aug 2020
                        • 117

                        Comment

                        • Fizz
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2012
                          • 1473

                          Originally posted by trustno12373
                          This may be a little off topic and this may not be the right group for this question.

                          I am thinking about changing the stock trigger on my Smith and Wesson M&P Shield 1.0 with the Hyve Technologies Monarch trigger. Does anyone know if this would violate any policies for San Diego
                          County Sheriffs department, since this is one of my carry guns.

                          The trigger swap does not alter the trigger pull in any way. I also emailed the CCW unit, but have not received a response as of yet.


                          **This will only fit the Smith & Wesson Shield 9mm, .40, .45** **This will not work with the 2.0** **This will not work with performance center** This product is made 100% in the USA As Trigger…


                          Can anyone share their thoughts or experiences with these kinds of modifications?


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          I run the Apex shoe, and a friend runs the Hyve shoe in our respective Shields on our CCWs. It's not explicitly against any state or IA rule. IIRC there's only a passing reference to making a gun unsafe.

                          My 2c. Make your gun shoot the best it possibly can, any circumstance where your mods will be called into question will be dwarfed by 20 other things, and if your mods make you shoot better or more comfortable/inclined to carry then pros > cons.

                          99.99% of CCWers will never actually fire their weapon (number out of my *** guesstimate).

                          The only real material case where mods might make a difference is in an accidental/negligent shooting of some kind. Anything else is a SD claim - you intended to shoot the perp, and the mods will be less relavent.

                          Comment

                          • trustno12373
                            Member
                            • Aug 2020
                            • 117

                            Originally posted by Fizz
                            I run the Apex shoe, and a friend runs the Hyve shoe in our respective Shields on our CCWs. It's not explicitly against any state or IA rule. IIRC there's only a passing reference to making a gun unsafe.

                            My 2c. Make your gun shoot the best it possibly can, any circumstance where your mods will be called into question will be dwarfed by 20 other things, and if your mods make you shoot better or more comfortable/inclined to carry then pros > cons.

                            99.99% of CCWers will never actually fire their weapon (number out of my *** guesstimate).

                            The only real material case where mods might make a difference is in an accidental/negligent shooting of some kind. Anything else is a SD claim - you intended to shoot the perp, and the mods will be less relavent.

                            Comment

                            • Paladin
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 12387

                              From another thread:

                              Originally posted by lairdb
                              240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

                              Comment

                              • LDL
                                Member
                                • Jan 2016
                                • 104

                                Another 4 weeks before I can pick up the permit. It's by appointment only.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1