Although Field Reps and DES are giving opinions, at least you have a name/date/time of someone who is directly involved with the Bureau of Firearms that enforces firearms licensing/regulation to somewhat fall back on if there is a question later on why you took a particular action (i.e. sold an off roster gun to a fire marshal after being told it was fine by your DOJ Field Rep and then having it come up in an audit).
As for the roster, it truly has become what is was NOT meant to be. Everyone can agree there is nothing more "unsafe" about a Gen4 Glock versus a Gen3 Glock.
Getting rid of the roster altogether would seem like the right thing to do, but highly unlikely in this political climate. However instances like this give some good additional reasons for it to be scrapped...

they are sworn peace officer. Pc 830.5

Comment