Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Contrary to "SuperTool" allegations, I didn't "call DOJ" on any personl/vendor...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    IVC
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jul 2010
    • 17594

    Originally posted by taperxz
    Lets have a little fun here.

    What if the BB "button" was magnetized? BB's are legal per law and the courts. HMMMMM
    If it were magnetized it would be a HUGE PROBLEM as the magnetic waves would penetrate the tin foil hat when one cheek-welds to shoot. I believe it would affect accuracy and would also allow government "brain waves" to sneak in alongside magnetic waves and start controlling one's brain and making one do what government wants him to do...

    Another explanation is that it would make no difference at all, but that's just crazy talk.
    sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

    Comment

    • #47
      barrage
      Banned
      • Oct 2012
      • 3351

      Originally posted by colossians323
      I agree. In the spirit of honesty though, I swear I didn't make the first response with the intention to troll. I just don't like Bill because he represents what I perceive as a Loyalist to the State for continuing to bend over backwards in an effort to acquiesce to illegal laws instead of standing in defiance to them.

      Comment

      • #48
        IVC
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jul 2010
        • 17594

        Originally posted by bomb_on_bus
        The Gray area is was referring to is where the magnet remains affixed to the rifle atop of the bullet button.
        No gray area at all.

        Remember how we justified that the bullet button makes a magazine "non detachable?" It goes along the lines of sitting in the courtroom and having the government expert who claims magazine is detachable try to get it out without using any tools.

        Well, what happens if he is demonstrating on a rifle that has the magnet on top of the BB? Saying "it's not part of the rifle" doesn't fly because it *is* attached to the rifle, so it's a part of the rifle. Glue and welds are not the only ways to attach things together...
        sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

        Comment

        • #49
          Tincon
          Mortuus Ergo Invictus
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Nov 2012
          • 5062

          Originally posted by barrage
          I agree. In the spirit of honesty though, I swear I didn't make the first response with the intention to troll. I just don't like Bill because he represents what I perceive as a Loyalist to the State for continuing to bend over backwards in an effort to acquiesce to illegal laws instead of standing in defiance to them.

          Prohibited persons make poor Second Amendment advocates.
          My posts may contain general information related to the law, however, THEY ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND I AM NOT A LAWYER. I recommend you consult a lawyer if you want legal advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship exists or will be formed between myself and any other person on the basis of these posts. Pronouns I may use (such as "you" and "your") do NOT refer to any particular person under any circumstance.

          Comment

          • #50
            IVC
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jul 2010
            • 17594

            Originally posted by barrage
            I just don't like Bill because he represents what I perceive as a Loyalist to the State for continuing to bend over backwards in an effort to acquiesce to illegal laws instead of standing in defiance to them.
            Heh, and we thought you didn't like him because he likes cats...
            sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

            Comment

            • #51
              taperxz
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2010
              • 19395

              Originally posted by IVC
              Heh, and we thought you didn't like him because he likes cats...
              Naaa, Its gotta be the unitard.

              Last edited by taperxz; 07-30-2014, 8:53 PM.

              Comment

              • #52
                wildhawker
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Nov 2008
                • 14150

                Originally posted by Tincon
                Prohibited persons make poor Second Amendment advocates.
                Concur. And that seems familiar.

                -BC
                Brandon Combs

                I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                Comment

                • #53
                  Tincon
                  Mortuus Ergo Invictus
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Nov 2012
                  • 5062

                  Originally posted by wildhawker
                  Concur. And that seems familiar.

                  -BC
                  Yeah I heard that somewhere.
                  My posts may contain general information related to the law, however, THEY ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND I AM NOT A LAWYER. I recommend you consult a lawyer if you want legal advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship exists or will be formed between myself and any other person on the basis of these posts. Pronouns I may use (such as "you" and "your") do NOT refer to any particular person under any circumstance.

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    barrage
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2012
                    • 3351

                    Originally posted by Tincon
                    Prohibited persons make poor Second Amendment advocates.
                    Who here is a "prohibited person"?

                    More so, who here isn't guilty of a few hundred felonies according to the State but hasn't been caught yet?

                    Don't get me wrong, I understand Bill's contributions. I just don't particularly care for people who celebrate the loss of fundamental rights as long as they're only incremental.

                    It is what it is.

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      Tincon
                      Mortuus Ergo Invictus
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 5062

                      Who is "celebrating the loss of fundamental rights as long as they're only incremental?"
                      My posts may contain general information related to the law, however, THEY ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND I AM NOT A LAWYER. I recommend you consult a lawyer if you want legal advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship exists or will be formed between myself and any other person on the basis of these posts. Pronouns I may use (such as "you" and "your") do NOT refer to any particular person under any circumstance.

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        barrage
                        Banned
                        • Oct 2012
                        • 3351

                        Originally posted by Tincon
                        Who is "celebrating the loss of fundamental rights as long as they're only incremental?"
                        Most of you guys on this site are just about every day. The fact that you can't understand that doesn't make me a troll, buddy. It just means you and I aren't necessarily on the same side.

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          bwiese
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 27621

                          Originally posted by vintagearms
                          People have misused them and the vendors have a "wink and a nod" policy when selling them. I think Bill here is just trying to give clarity before someone gets hauled into court over them.
                          There have been somewhere in the nature of at least 15-20 cases in N Cal "Sac-area-and-below" alone, with some sort of conviction - perhaps misdemeanor, sometimes felony.

                          Bill Wiese
                          San Jose, CA

                          CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                          sigpic
                          No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                          to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                          ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                          employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                          legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            five.five-six
                            CGN Contributor
                            • May 2006
                            • 34709

                            Originally posted by barrage
                            I agree. In the spirit of honesty though, I swear I didn't make the first response with the intention to troll. I just don't like Bill because he represents what I perceive as a Loyalist to the State for continuing to bend over backwards in an effort to acquiesce to illegal laws instead of standing in defiance to them.
                            There is a fair likelihood that if it wasn't for Bill and Bill's actions years ago that you wouldn't have a BB option on your AR today, top loader only. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


                            EDIT, do you even know what a toploader is? If you have to google it, thank Bill.

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              bwiese
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 27621

                              Originally posted by vintagearms
                              People have misused them and the vendors have a "wink and a nod" policy when selling them. I think Bill here is just trying to give clarity before someone gets hauled into court over them.
                              There have been somewhere in the nature of at least 15-20 cases in N Cal "Sac-area-and-below" alone in relatively recent time span, with some sort of conviction - perhaps misdemeanor, sometimes felony. I don't have all the details.

                              I suspect magnetic override AW cases in recent times have eclipsed any other AW case "style" for post-2005 guns.

                              Bill Wiese
                              San Jose, CA

                              CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                              sigpic
                              No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                              to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                              ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                              employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                              legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                barrage
                                Banned
                                • Oct 2012
                                • 3351

                                And Bill... I swear like a sailor myself. Sorry for bringing up the cow palace thing. That was a low blow and I totally knew it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1