Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

2013 CA AB 170 Bradford - AB-170 Assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Markinsac
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 1001

    2013 CA AB 170 Bradford - AB-170 Assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles

    This one will only allow an individual to register or renew an "assault weapon" permit - no corporations, LLCs, etc. It would probably put any of the ranges that rent them out for shooting from keeping them.



    LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


    AB 170, as introduced, Bradford. Assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles.
    Existing law, subject to exceptions, generally prohibits the possession of an assault weapon or a .50 BMG rifle, as defined. Violation of these prohibitions is a criminal offense. Existing law requires a person who wishes to acquire an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle to obtain a permit from the Department of Justice. Existing law defines “person” as an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, association, or any other group or entity, regardless of how it was created, for these permit purposes and other purposes related to the regulation of assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles. Existing law requires a permit to possess a machinegun. Violation of these provisions is a criminal offense.
    This bill would define “person” as an individual for those permit purposes for assault weapons, .50 BMG rifles, and machineguns, and other purposes related to the regulation of assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles. The bill would except application of that definition from provisions that generally prohibit the manufacture, distribution, transportation, importation, keeping for sale, offering for sale, exposing for sale, giving, or lending, of an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle, and from provisions imposing specified sentencing enhancements related to violations of law relating to assault weapons or .50 BMG rifles. The bill would make additional conforming changes, including changes relating to annual inspections, for security and safe storage purposes, of certain permitees possessing assault weapons or .50 BMG rifles, as specified.
    By changing provisions of law regulating the acquisition of assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
    The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
    This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
    Digest KeyVote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bill Text

    The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


    SECTION 1. Section 16970 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

    16970. (a) As used in Sections 16790 and 17505 and in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30500) of Division 10 of Title 4, 30600, and 30615, “person” means an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, association, or any other group or entity, regardless of how it was created.
    (b) As used in Section 16970 and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30500) of Division 10 of Title 4, except for Sections 30600 and 30615, “person” means an individual.

    SEC. 2. Section 31000 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

    31000. (a) Any person who lawfully acquired an assault weapon before June 1, 1989, or a .50 BMG rifle before January 1, 2005, and wishes to use it in a manner different than specified in Section 30945 shall first obtain a permit from the Department of Justice in the same manner as specified in Article 3 (commencing with Section 32650) of Chapter 6.
    (b) Any person who lawfully acquired an assault weapon between June 1, 1989, and January 1, 1990, and wishes to keep it after January 1, 1990, shall first obtain a permit from the Department of Justice in the same manner as specified in Article 3 (commencing with Section 32650) of Chapter 6.
    (c) Any person who wishes to acquire an assault weapon after January 1, 1990, or a .50 BMG rifle after January 1, 2005, shall first obtain a permit from the Department of Justice in the same manner as specified in Article 3 (commencing with Section 32650) of Chapter 6.
    (d) On and after January 1, 2014, no partnership, corporation, limited liability company, association, or any other group or entity, regardless of how the entity was created, may be issued a permit to posses an assault weapon or a .50 BMG rifle.

    SEC. 3. Section 31110 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

    31110. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the Department of Justice shall, for every person, firm, or corporation to whom a permit is issued pursuant to this article, annually conduct an inspection for security and safe storage purposes, and to reconcile the inventory of assault weapons.
    (b) A person, firm, or corporation with an inventory of fewer than five devices that require any Department of Justice permit shall be subject to an inspection for security and safe storage purposes, and to reconcile inventory, once every five years, or more frequently if determined by the department.

    SEC. 4. Section 32650 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

    32650. (a) The Department of Justice may issue permits for the possession, manufacture, and transportation or possession, manufacture, or transportation of machineguns, upon a satisfactory showing that good cause exists for the issuance of the permit to the applicant. No permit shall be issued to a person who is under 18 years of age.
    (b) A permit for possession issued pursuant to this section may only be issued to an individual, and may not be issued to a partnership, corporation, limited liability company, association, or any other group or entity, regardless of how that entity was created.

    SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
    Last edited by Librarian; 01-25-2013, 2:46 PM.
  • #2
    Apocalypsenerd
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 942

    Registration ALWAYS precedes confiscation.
    Let me handle your property needs and I will donate 10% of the brokerage total commission to CG.
    Buy or sell a home.
    Property management including vacation rentals.
    We can help with loans and refi's. 10% of all commissions will be donated to CG.

    Serving the greater San Diego area.

    Aaron Ross - BRE #01865640
    CA Broker

    Comment

    • #3
      LOW2000
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Jan 2006
      • 941

      Looks like they take seriously the idea that if a DWP can be issued to a corporation, that opens floodgates potentially. Looks like the idea has merit.
      All comments are solely for educational purposes and are spoken in a hypothetical manner. The poster follows any and all statutes, codes, mandates, etc to the letter of the law.

      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        cleonard
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 958

        So no more so called assault weapons and 50 BMGs in Hollywood movies after 2014?

        Comment

        • #5
          Rusty_Rebar
          Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 328

          would this have any impact on a gun trust?

          Comment

          • #6
            fizux
            Senior Member
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Apr 2012
            • 1540

            Originally posted by Rusty_Rebar
            would this have any impact on a gun trust?
            It depends.
            Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

            Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

            Case Status: (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).

            Comment

            • #7
              Hoooper
              Veteran Member
              • Dec 2012
              • 2711

              so, would this affect any/all the firearms manufacturers in the state including suppliers to DoD?

              Comment

              • #8
                spamsucker
                Banned
                • Jun 2012
                • 701

                way to ruin the propmasters industry. Bye bye hollywood.

                Comment

                • #9
                  SantaCabinetguy
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 15137

                  Originally posted by LOW2000
                  Looks like they take seriously the idea that if a DWP can be issued to a corporation, that opens floodgates potentially. Looks like the idea has merit.
                  My thoughts exactly.
                  Hauoli Makahiki Hou


                  -------

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    CABilly
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 1613

                    Hollywood can use airsoft and CGI. They don't need the real thing any more than the peasants do.
                    Don't feed the cannibals.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      compulsivegunbuyer
                      Veteran Member
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 2549

                      Originally posted by CABilly
                      Hollywood can use airsoft and CGI. They don't need the real thing any more than the peasants do.
                      Their intent on bankrupting the state anyways, so why sould they care. Hollywood has been leaving for more cost friendly places for a while now.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Whiterabbit
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 7582

                        Originally posted by CABilly
                        Hollywood can use airsoft and CGI. They don't need the real thing any more than the peasants do.
                        Arent they in LA? Doesnt that mean their airsoft props need to be painted bright orange?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          nothinghere2c
                          Senior Member
                          • Mar 2012
                          • 2259

                          Originally posted by Whiterabbit
                          Arent they in LA? Doesnt that mean their airsoft props need to be painted bright orange?


                          yes, considering they can be, with minimal work, converted into machine guns.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            PhillyGunner
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 742

                            Let me see if I get this right. Corporations are protected under the 1st Amendment, but not the 2nd?

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              kmca
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 2371

                              There's those pesky old "may issue" and "show good cause" statements again.
                              There's usually an exception for the movie business.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1