Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Haynie / Richards v. Harris (AW Ban)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fizux
    Senior Member
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Apr 2012
    • 1540

    Haynie / Richards v. Harris (AW Ban)

    Haynie v. Harris AKA Richards v. Harris
    (FKA Haynie v. City of Pleasanton)
    Issue: Challenge to California's Ban on Scary-Looking Guns.

    Current Status:
    As of 12/11/2013 - Trial Court, awaiting settlement with Rohnert Park, (dispositive?) motion(s) set for 6/27/2014.

    11/18/2013 - Minute order entered: Motion Hearing set for 6/27/2014.
    11/8/2013 - Joint CMC stmt.
    10/8/2013 - MSC vacated.
    9/10/2013 - CMC continued to 11/15/2013; MSC ordered within 30 days.
    11/1/2012 - Amended Complaint (Second Consolidated).
    6/9/2012 - Cases Consolidated (3:10-cv-01255, 3:11-cv-02493, 3:11-cv-05580, 3:12-cv-00452).

    Trial Court: N.D. Cal.
    Case No.: 3:10-cv-01255
    Docket: http://ia700507.us.archive.org/10/it...76.docket.html

    Links:
    CGF Wiki for this case: http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Richards_v._Harris
    CGF Wiki Litigation page: http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Li...st_and_Present
    Last edited by fizux; 12-11-2013, 6:59 PM. Reason: updates
    Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

    Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

    Case Status: (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).
  • #2
    deter
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 115

    I'm eagerly anticipating this one.

    Anybody in here have any idea what kind of timeline we might expect on this?
    Two weeks?
    Originally posted by Kestryll
    5) Hey, wanna get pancakes?"

    Comment

    • #3
      fizux
      Senior Member
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Apr 2012
      • 1540

      Originally posted by deter
      Two weeks?
      Ironically, it is exactly two weeks until the CMC, whereupon you'll be instructed to hold your breath for another three months until the next CMC.
      Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

      Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

      Case Status: (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).

      Comment

      • #4
        eville
        Senior Member
        • May 2010
        • 902

        CMC today. No mention of any delays. Hopefully new updates soon!
        Steve

        Comment

        • #5
          deter
          Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 115

          A girl can dream
          Originally posted by Kestryll
          5) Hey, wanna get pancakes?"

          Comment

          • #6
            Dreaded Claymore
            Veteran Member
            • May 2010
            • 3231

            :drool: what did we get?

            Comment

            • #7
              monk
              Veteran Member
              • Jul 2011
              • 4454

              Who wants to bet it was pushed back to next year?


              NRA Member
              SAF Member


              A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

              Comment

              • #8
                Window_Seat
                Veteran Member
                • Apr 2008
                • 3533

                Guys, Gals...

                Please remember that we are 0 for XXX in the CAxx District Court, 1 for (I think) 5 or 6 in the U.S. Court of Appeals (see Moore v. Madigan, 702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir. 2012)) (so far), and we are 2 for 2 on 1 First Street, N.E.

                I would consider saving the drooling and dreaming for the bigger sandwiches (and take a nap for now).

                Erik.

                Comment

                • #9
                  monk
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 4454

                  Originally posted by Window_Seat
                  Guys, Gals...

                  Please remember that we are 0 for XXX in the CAxx District Court, 1 for (I think) 5 or 6 in the U.S. Court of Appeals (see Moore v. Madigan, 702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir. 2012)) (so far), and we are 2 for 2 on 1 First Street, N.E.

                  I would consider saving the drooling and dreaming for the bigger sandwiches (and take a nap for now).

                  Erik.
                  I have no idea what this means.


                  NRA Member
                  SAF Member


                  A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    LoneYote
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 608

                    Originally posted by monk
                    I have no idea what this means.
                    He is saying we haven't won anything at CA appeals... and only won once at Fed appeals level. Basically, he is saying we will not win anything here wait for SCOTUS.
                    "I do not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
                    Originally posted by mossy
                    let me guess this means the case will move as fast as a Tuttle on heroin now instead of a snail on salt.................
                    Originally posted by Librarian
                    Need we have a moderator behind every blade of grass?

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      eville
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2010
                      • 902

                      We have to lose before we win then. So what happened yesterday?
                      Steve

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        monk
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jul 2011
                        • 4454

                        Originally posted by eville
                        We have to lose before we win then. So what happened yesterday?
                        If history is any inclination, postponed or loss.


                        NRA Member
                        SAF Member


                        A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Bhobbs
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 11850

                          Originally posted by monk
                          I have no idea what this means.
                          He is saying the only time we have a chance of winning is the SCOTUS and that is years away. So get comfortable and wait it out.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            monk
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 4454

                            2013-08-29 79 0 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to reset CMC filed by Calguns Foundation, Inc., Mark Aaron Haynie, Brendan John Richards, Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.. (Kilmer, Donald) (Filed on 8/29/2013) (Entered: 08/29/2013)

                            2013-08-29 80 0 ORDER by Judge Susan Illston denying 79 Stipulation to continue hearing. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013) (Entered: 08/29/2013)

                            2013-08-30 81 0 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT for Sept. 6, 2013 CMC filed by Calguns Foundation, Inc., Mark Aaron Haynie, Brendan John Richards, Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.. (Kilmer, Donald) (Filed on 8/30/2013) (Entered: 08/30/2013)

                            2013-08-30 82 0 NOTICE by City of Pleasanton Notice of Removal from Electronic Notification


                            NRA Member
                            SAF Member


                            A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              deter
                              Member
                              • Feb 2012
                              • 115

                              Yeah still no idea what this means.

                              Lawyer English sucks.
                              Originally posted by Kestryll
                              5) Hey, wanna get pancakes?"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1