Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

(GENERAL How Does Registration Work thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hoop
    Ready fo HILLARY!!
    • Apr 2007
    • 11534

    Originally posted by shoutitoutshutitup
    ^^^^^
    They're got better things to do with their time than hassle law-abiding citizens and too easy to foul up and possibly get sued
    Oh believe me cops have more than enough time on their hands to enforce these laws should you run afoul of them. Like if you get pulled over on the way home from the range or something.

    Comment

    • shoutitoutshutitup
      Banned
      • Aug 2017
      • 209

      Originally posted by Hoop
      Oh believe me cops have more than enough time on their hands to enforce these laws should you run afoul of them. Like if you get pulled over on the way home from the range or something.
      How many times have you been pulled over for what amounted to a loaded weapon check with your RAW from 2000, or any other check for loaded weapons?

      Comment

      • Discogodfather
        CGN Contributor
        • Feb 2010
        • 5516

        Originally posted by shoutitoutshutitup
        Have you ever been confronted by LE in person about your RAW in the past 17 years?

        If so, have you ever shown them the paperwork either at their request, or you had volunteered it?
        No, but I have paperwork with me at all times and also a copy inside the rifle. Never had to show it. Had plenty of gawkers and people at ranges getting all weird about not having a BB, but no LEO interest.
        Originally posted by doggie
        Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
        Originally posted by PMACA_MFG
        Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
        "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

        Comment

        • Discogodfather
          CGN Contributor
          • Feb 2010
          • 5516

          Originally posted by mshill
          Watched the whole thing. It was a total cluster f--k back then and will be even worse after this one. They will have to cover Category 1,2,3, BBAW, and then have to describe featureless and a whole bunch of flavors of "fixed" magazine firearms. They will also be expected to be able to determine the difference between a brake and a flash hider.

          When they run the serial numbers to verify it is a RAW, they will also need to have the date that it was registered to determine if it is an "illegal" magazine release that would have had to be registered before 1/1/2000.

          I see two one of two things happening:
          1) LEOs will just take the firearms and you get them back in a year OR
          2) LEOs get tired of this **** and just stop trying to enforce this on otherwise law abiding citizens.
          Well, that video was a different time though. The key to understanding LEO E-Checks and them inspecting RAW is that they are going to go for the AFS check. Almost every LEO, from what I understand, has that system access from their vehicles. They can check quickly.

          The paperwork is just a validation of the same information that the AFS check would show. It's up to LEO to either accept the validity of it or not. No idea what their policy is on that, but a reasonable LEO would probably just take it.

          So for me the bad situation is where the LEO AFS is not available. Maybe it's down or they are out of range (think BLM land). Maybe they are not familiar or trained on running an AFS check. Who knows, there could be lots of reasons they can't check.

          We also have to assume this is a problem for ALL rifles though, at least anything semi-automatic. If a cop is dumb or can't use the AFS, a featureless rifle could just as easily be inspected and then removed to the station for further inspection.

          US LEO is a mishmash of different policies, procedures, and capabilities/knowledge. There is no universal standard (or very few) and the reaction you get in one town is totally different from the situation you get into in another. It's all a roll of the dice.

          Never really gotten into an E-Check situation other than 2 times in 25 years of ownership, but one thing I have kind of imagined I would do is to actually request an AFS check on the spot if it looked like LEO was going to take the weapon back to the station. That could be a year without a rifle or 2 weeks, no one knows. By requesting the AFS maybe it reminds officers to do it that way, and that if they refuse to do it and you get them to admit they aren't going to do it even though they have the capability to on the spot, then that information could be used against them legally in the future.
          Originally posted by doggie
          Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
          Originally posted by PMACA_MFG
          Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
          "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

          Comment

          • Mayor McRifle
            Calguns Addict
            • Dec 2013
            • 7658

            Originally posted by Hoop
            Oh believe me cops have more than enough time on their hands to enforce these laws should you run afoul of them. Like if you get pulled over on the way home from the range or something.
            If that's true, then you better remember to take the mag magnet off your rifle when you drive home from the range. Otherwise, I've never met anyone, LE or otherwise, who cared.
            Anchors Aweigh

            sigpic

            Comment

            • Discogodfather
              CGN Contributor
              • Feb 2010
              • 5516

              Originally posted by Hoop
              Oh believe me cops have more than enough time on their hands to enforce these laws should you run afoul of them. Like if you get pulled over on the way home from the range or something.
              The big thing to realize is that it's all based on location. For me, I have to drive through the most militant anti-gun places in the USA to get to a range to shoot my guns, weekly. It's paranoid to say the least, and I have to make sure everything is right to exercise 2A.

              If I was in Chico or Stockton, not so much. If I was in Lassen, maybe nothing at all because I know the local sheriff won't even prosecute for anything.

              We all live in different situations. Rules are different everywhere (despite what the law says), but what we all have in common is that those that control the law and it's enforcement agree with the people that live where I live, which is to say the heart of anti-gun lunacy.
              Originally posted by doggie
              Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
              Originally posted by PMACA_MFG
              Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
              "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

              Comment

              • mutejosh
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2014
                • 889

                Originally posted by Discogodfather
                The big thing to realize is that it's all based on location. For me, I have to drive through the most militant anti-gun places in the USA to get to a range to shoot my guns, weekly. It's paranoid to say the least, and I have to make sure everything is right to exercise 2A.

                If I was in Chico or Stockton, not so much. If I was in Lassen, maybe nothing at all because I know the local sheriff won't even prosecute for anything.

                We all live in different situations. Rules are different everywhere (despite what the law says), but what we all have in common is that those that control the law and it's enforcement agree with the people that live where I live, which is to say the heart of anti-gun lunacy.
                Great point.

                Comment

                • Jonas Jonas
                  Junior Member
                  • Aug 2017
                  • 19

                  Hello, its been a month. Did you hear anything from DOJ? or any update?

                  Comment

                  • Crazed_SS
                    Veteran Member
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 4114

                    Absolutely no update on the 7 I submitted about a month ago.
                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • Jonas Jonas
                      Junior Member
                      • Aug 2017
                      • 19

                      ack, ok

                      Comment

                      • caliguy93
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2016
                        • 1512

                        No update on the 20 I submitted a month ago...

                        I did submit my last 9 including the home built that have been volregd and the other home built a that have been engraved per ATF spec but not volregd

                        Comment

                        • Discogodfather
                          CGN Contributor
                          • Feb 2010
                          • 5516

                          Originally posted by caliguy93
                          No update on the 20 I submitted a month ago...

                          I did submit my last 9 including the home built that have been volregd and the other home built a that have been engraved per ATF spec but not volregd
                          At this rate there will be a run on registration soon because it's going to take 3 months to process. This is really absurd, why did they open if they don't even have a system up yet to process and approve? Probably so they could claim they opened the reg period with enough time, lol.
                          Originally posted by doggie
                          Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
                          Originally posted by PMACA_MFG
                          Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
                          "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

                          Comment

                          • whatmeworry
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2008
                            • 705

                            Joint registration questions.

                            1: How many family members can be named as joint registrants per firearm?

                            2: I know the main registrant needs to be over 18 yrs old. Can a joint registrant be under 18?
                            Originally posted by Kestryll
                            ......yes I'm an idiot

                            Comment

                            • CandG
                              Spent $299 for this text!
                              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                              • Apr 2014
                              • 16970

                              Originally posted by whatmeworry
                              Joint registration questions.

                              1: How many family members can be named as joint registrants per firearm?

                              2: I know the main registrant needs to be over 18 yrs old. Can a joint registrant be under 18?
                              1: As many as you have, that live at your house.

                              2: Joint registrants can only be under 18 if they turn 18 before 7/1/2018.

                              See also, AW Registration: The Complete Guide
                              Last edited by CandG; 09-06-2017, 1:23 AM.
                              Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


                              Comment

                              • whatmeworry
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2008
                                • 705

                                Thanks
                                Originally posted by Kestryll
                                ......yes I'm an idiot

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1