Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

MERGED THREADS "Bullet Button Assault Weapon" Regs

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • penguinman
    Member
    • Jun 2016
    • 247

    Originally posted by BAJ475
    I did not see anything in the proposed regs to prevent that.
    Oh, I assume there will be some hilarious ones.

    Comment

    • AlexDD
      Senior Member
      • May 2007
      • 906

      So if I am understanding correctly....

      Everyone in California who owns

      1.) a mag locked shotgun (Saiga, etc...) or
      2.) a mag locked pistol (AK, AR, etc...)

      must register their weapon if they wish to keep and use in the state or face violating the law. They also must keep it in that configuration.

      For all other mag locked rifles, going featureless avoids registration and one would not need to register.

      Comment

      • BAJ475
        Calguns Addict
        • Jul 2014
        • 5052

        Originally posted by scottz
        Funny how most everyone on this site thought that you'd be able to change to a standard mag release after registering. It was pretty clear that wasn't the case from the beginning.....
        The regs are just proposals at this point. Don't count your chickens before they are hatched. I will be offering to be a plaintiff in the suit to challenge this restriction if it makes it through the OAL, or I may just file my own action.

        Comment

        • Discogodfather
          CGN Contributor
          • Feb 2010
          • 5516

          Originally posted by BAJ475
          The regs are just proposals at this point. Don't count your chickens before they are hatched. I will be offering to be a plaintiff in the suit to challenge this restriction if it makes it through the OAL, or I may just file my own action.
          They did just withdraw their crappy Mag regs, any hope of that here?

          What about the timetable? When do these regs become official? Fabio said in a few pages back that this does in fact take effect on the 1st?
          Originally posted by doggie
          Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
          Originally posted by PMACA_MFG
          Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
          "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

          Comment

          • skyscraper
            Calguns Addict
            • Feb 2011
            • 5196

            Originally posted by BAJ475
            The regs are just proposals at this point. Don't count your chickens before they are hatched. I will be offering to be a plaintiff in the suit to challenge this restriction if it makes it through the OAL, or I may just file my own action.
            Not proposals.. File and Print:

            Originally posted by FABIO GETS GOOSED!!!
            It's "file and print," OAL is not reviewing the regulations, they're effective 1/1/17.
            This is the actual file, check the first page : "File and print"

            Comment

            • ifilef
              Banned
              • Apr 2008
              • 5665

              Originally posted by BAJ475
              Is it not underground. It was submitted to the OAL. They do not have to approve it. In any event, it does not appear that the regs will go into effect before Feb of next year.
              It's probably not underground because they voted to bypass the checks and balances of the APA. The APA does not apply because it was statutorily exempted in amd. PC 30900(b)(5).

              I am new to the topic of underground regs but here is a link that'll get one started:

              Last edited by ifilef; 12-30-2016, 10:10 PM.

              Comment

              • God Bless America
                Calguns Addict
                • May 2014
                • 5163

                Originally posted by ifilef
                What if it's already registered as an AW? How could one be charged with manufacturing?
                Manufacturing a pre-2000 AW.

                I understand that you don't agree, maybe you don't understand,, but there it is, whether you agree with it or not.

                Comment

                • Shadowdrop
                  Member
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 495

                  SB 880 regulations are exempt from OAL. These will be the regs. They are simply submitting them to have them filed and published.

                  As far as revocation not being spelled out, it doesn't have to be. The regs are their rules saying, "don't do it." If you do it, they kick you out of the club. The law defers the rules of AW registration to the CA DOJ and they have a great deal of leeway. Prove me wrong.

                  Comment

                  • John Browning
                    Calguns Addict
                    • May 2006
                    • 8088

                    Honest question: Why would anyone register if you have other legal options? I get, respect and admire that many will not comply because of the morality of taking a stand against tyrannical BS. If we all took that stand, this couldn't fly. However, if you're not brave enough to take the stand, why not take a much easier and more profitable route?

                    If you have a pistol that can't be made featureless and don't have an out of state residence to store it, I can understand that situation. For everybody else, why not just go to a new compliance device or go featureless?

                    I see no honest reason to even consider registration if other legally valid options exist. There is nothing to be gained, everything to be lost, and other options available.
                    Last edited by John Browning; 12-30-2016, 10:12 PM.
                    For Sale: Off Roster Handgun Moving Sale

                    For Sale: Off Roster CZ, Browning, PTR 91 Moving Sale

                    Originally posted by KWalkerM
                    eh why bring logic into this, that makes too much sense... besides when you have bested a fool, you have accomplished nothing and he is a fool.

                    Comment

                    • reverser
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 710

                      And what if I bought one of my uppers from a guy at a range that didn't give me a receipt and I never knew his name? They have to prove I don't own the upper. If they want to see it in person, they should either come to my house to look at it or pay me to drive and show it to them. Either way, how do they know it is a different upper from the other one if they don't see all of the rifles at once?

                      As my grandmother would say... IF IF IF IF IF!!!


                      Originally posted by Smedkcuf
                      What if they demand receipts for the uppers shown in the photos before they approve your registration?
                      Originally posted by sfarchitect
                      The days of scared old white people, terrified that life and the world has passed them by running America is coming to a close.

                      Comment

                      • sd_shooter
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 13189

                        Originally posted by PartyBarge
                        That is correct, once registered, BB stays.
                        My prediction:
                        - No one will register
                        - Everyone will get a grip wrap
                        - Next year: grip wrap illegal (this year's legal option is always next year's 'loophole')

                        End of AR15 in Kali.

                        Comment

                        • BAJ475
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Jul 2014
                          • 5052

                          Originally posted by SkyHawk
                          FPC now saying it looks like we'll be stuck with bullet buttons

                          http://firearmspolicy.us7.list-manag...b&e=a18676b4e7
                          I do not think that they are saying that we are stuck with it, but rather that is what the proposed regs say. Given that IMHO there is no statutory basis to support such a regulation, I will file suit if this makes it through the OAL and the FPC does not file suit first.

                          Comment

                          • Cokebottle
                            Señor Member
                            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 32373

                            Originally posted by AlexDD
                            So if I am understanding correctly....

                            Everyone in California who owns

                            1.) a mag locked shotgun (Saiga, etc...) or
                            2.) a mag locked pistol (AK, AR, etc...)

                            must register their weapon if they wish to keep and use in the state or face violating the law. They also must keep it in that configuration.
                            Or meet the new definition of fixed magazine.

                            Patriot Button, ARMaglock, Franklin DFM
                            There is also a lock available for the AK pattern, don't know if it is compatible with Saiga mags or not as the mags do require modification.
                            - Rich

                            Originally posted by dantodd
                            A just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.

                            Comment

                            • John Browning
                              Calguns Addict
                              • May 2006
                              • 8088

                              Originally posted by BAJ475
                              I do not think that they are saying that we are stuck with it, but rather that is what the proposed regs say. Given that IMHO there is no statutory basis to support such a regulation, I will file suit if this makes it through the OAL and the FPC does not file suit first.
                              These regulations are the final version. They're "read and file."

                              Courts are open Jan 2nd.
                              For Sale: Off Roster Handgun Moving Sale

                              For Sale: Off Roster CZ, Browning, PTR 91 Moving Sale

                              Originally posted by KWalkerM
                              eh why bring logic into this, that makes too much sense... besides when you have bested a fool, you have accomplished nothing and he is a fool.

                              Comment

                              • John Browning
                                Calguns Addict
                                • May 2006
                                • 8088

                                Originally posted by Cokebottle
                                Or meet the new definition of fixed magazine.

                                Patriot Button, ARMaglock, Franklin DFM
                                There is also a lock available for the AK pattern, don't know if it is compatible with Saiga mags or not as the mags do require modification.
                                Or go featureless. With an AK, take off the pistol grip. Change the muzzle device in some cases.

                                Voila!
                                For Sale: Off Roster Handgun Moving Sale

                                For Sale: Off Roster CZ, Browning, PTR 91 Moving Sale

                                Originally posted by KWalkerM
                                eh why bring logic into this, that makes too much sense... besides when you have bested a fool, you have accomplished nothing and he is a fool.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1