Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Ammunition vendor not shipping ammunition to specific city in CA?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Regula
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 121

    Ammunition vendor not shipping ammunition to specific city in CA?

    I see this on a lot of vendors webpages but cant seem to find any law to read about it...can someone help me here?
    "CALIFORNIA CUSTOMERS: No sales of ammunition delivered to the counties of Marin, Napa, and San Francisco. No ammunition delivered to the Cities of: Berkley, Carson, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Francisco. No high capacity magazine exceeding 10rds sales to anyone or dealer in CA. Check for other Local & State laws before ordering."
  • #2
    sakosf
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 1573

    Originally posted by Regula
    I see this on a lot of vendors webpages but cant seem to find any law to read about it...can someone help me here?
    "CALIFORNIA CUSTOMERS: No sales of ammunition delivered to the counties of Marin, Napa, and San Francisco. No ammunition delivered to the Cities of: Berkley, Carson, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Francisco. No high capacity magazine exceeding 10rds sales to anyone or dealer in CA. Check for other Local & State laws before ordering."
    Likely because in some cases there is not a specific law/ordnance prohibiting it. Some localities do have record keeping requirements for vendors selling ammunition though. Some sellers on Gunbroker will not ship ammo to anywhere in CA

    Comment

    • #3
      WARTFROG
      Banned
      • Jan 2014
      • 272

      San Fran will sue

      Comment

      • #4
        HappyCamper781
        CGSSA Coordinator
        • Oct 2012
        • 1856

        AB 48 prevents sales of mags and rebuild kits.

        Local ordinances for cities / counties prevent ammo sales without fingerprint / ID check.

        Comment

        • #5
          Hoooper
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2012
          • 2711

          can someone actually cite the law for all of these? I have looked for anything from Marin many times and have yet to come up with even a hint of a clue. Ive found some of the other ones, but Marin eludes me

          Comment

          • #6
            stix213
            AKA: Joe Censored
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Apr 2009
            • 18998

            I know Marin county has an ammo sales ordinance that can be interpreted to not allow online sales (requires thumb print if I remember correctly, how do you get that online?). Can't speak to the others.

            Comment

            • #7
              Best sale
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2012
              • 1092

              There is a term like " california friendly Vendors" that will be your gateway to transaction & Politicking with the Free world, incase you forget you are a resident of a communist state, Comrade
              sigpic

              Comment

              • #8
                Hoooper
                Veteran Member
                • Dec 2012
                • 2711

                Originally posted by stix213
                I know Marin county has an ammo sales ordinance that can be interpreted to not allow online sales (requires thumb print if I remember correctly, how do you get that online?). Can't speak to the others.
                have you ever actually seen the code though? I cannot find anything.

                Edit: oooo I found something finally. Looks like if you have a business licence to sell ammo you have to record some items. However, no mention of a requirement to have a business license for selling ammo or anything similar, which would suggest to me that if you have a business license for anything other than selling ammo or just no business license you dont have to keep a record...

                Originally posted by Marin county code 6.58.075 Record of Ammunition Sales

                Every holder of a business license to sell ammunition shall maintain records pertaining to ammunition sales prescribed by this Chapter on the licensed premises and in the manner prescribed herein. The record shall show:

                (A) The date of the transaction;

                (B) The purchaser's name, address and date of birth;

                (C) The purchaser's driver's license number or other identification and State where issued;

                (D) The brand of ammunition purchased;

                (E) The type and amount of ammunition purchased; and

                (F) The purchaser's signature; and

                (G) The purchaser’s thumbprint;

                (H) Log of Ammunition Sales.

                The information required by this subsection 6.58.075(H) shall be completed in the logbook at the time of the purchase. Such information shall be recorded in the following format:

                AMMUNITION SALES REGISTRATION LOG

                STORE:

                Date


                Name


                Address


                Date of Birth


                License/ID & State


                Ammunition Brand


                Ammunition Type & Amount


                Purchaser Signature



                (1) The record shall be maintained in chronological order by date of sale of the ammunition, and shall be retained on the licensed premises of the business licensee for a period of two (2) years following the date of the purchase of the ammunition.

                (2) At the direction of the Sheriff or his or her designee, deputy sheriffs may enter the premises of any licensed vendor of ammunition during regular business hours for the purpose of examining or inspecting any record required by this Chapter.

                Exception.

                The provisions of this section shall not apply to the sale of firearm ammunition by a firing range licensed to do business in the County when the ammunition so purchased is expended on the premises of the range and not removed for use outside the range premises.
                Last edited by Hoooper; 01-24-2014, 8:39 AM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  fizux
                  Senior Member
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Apr 2012
                  • 1540

                  SF Police Code section 613. Requires registration of ammo vendors (which requires a fire inspection of the premises, etc.). Legally, this can only apply to vendors located in SF, but the City Attorney has made it known that he will sue anyone for anything related to firearms, even if they are at a gun show in another county (Cow Palace = San Mateo County).

                  He wants to be mayor one day, and he doesn't care how many defenseless civilians get raped or murdered because of his totalitarian agenda.
                  Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

                  Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

                  Case Status: (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    BumBum
                    Senior Member
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 1607

                    Originally posted by fizux
                    SF Police Code section 613. Requires registration of ammo vendors (which requires a fire inspection of the premises, etc.). Legally, this can only apply to vendors located in SF, but the City Attorney has made it known that he will sue anyone for anything related to firearms, even if they are at a gun show in another county (Cow Palace = San Mateo County).

                    He wants to be mayor one day, and he doesn't care how many defenseless civilians get raped or murdered because of his totalitarian agenda.
                    Small correction, the Cow Palace actually straddles the City/County line. It sits on both the County of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco.
                    sigpic
                    DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is general in nature, which may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances, and is intended for informational purposes only. Consistent with Calguns policy, the information does not constitute legal advice or opinions and should not be relied upon as such. Transmission of the information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon any information in my posts without seeking professional counsel.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      fizux
                      Senior Member
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 1540

                      Originally posted by BumBum
                      Small correction, the Cow Palace actually straddles the City/County line. It sits on both the County of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco.
                      That is incorrect. The county line clips the corner of the old outdoor theater adjacent to the Cow Palace, but the entrance, parking lots, and the Cow Palace itself are all in San Mateo (APN: 005-050-270).
                      Last edited by fizux; 01-24-2014, 9:19 AM.
                      Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

                      Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

                      Case Status: (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        BumBum
                        Senior Member
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Jan 2013
                        • 1607

                        Originally posted by fizux
                        That is incorrect. The county line clips the corner of the old outdoor theater adjacent to the Cow Palace, but the entrance, parking lots, and the Cow Palace itself are all in San Mateo (APN: 005-050-270).
                        You are right. I remember this was an issue with the now-vetoed SB 475. What I should have said was that the agricultural district on which the Cow Palace sits is their shared jurisdiction. From the text of the bill: "Existing law divides the state into agricultural districts, and establishes that District 1-A is the County of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco." http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...201320140SB475
                        sigpic
                        DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is general in nature, which may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances, and is intended for informational purposes only. Consistent with Calguns policy, the information does not constitute legal advice or opinions and should not be relied upon as such. Transmission of the information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon any information in my posts without seeking professional counsel.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          fizux
                          Senior Member
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Apr 2012
                          • 1540

                          Originally posted by BumBum
                          You are right. I remember this was an issue with the now-vetoed SB 475. What I should have said was that the agricultural district on which the Cow Palace sits is their shared jurisdiction. From the text of the bill: "Existing law divides the state into agricultural districts, and establishes that District 1-A is the County of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco." http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...201320140SB475
                          I live 2 blocks away, and still had to look at the assessors' maps for SF and SM to be absolutely sure I was correct before replying. Your point is well taken.
                          Nationwide Master List of Current 2A Cases, courtesy of Al Norris @ TFL.

                          Reloading Clubs: SF, East Bay

                          Case Status: (Handgun Roster). SF v. 44Mag (Mag Parts Kits). Bauer v. Harris (DROS Fees). Davis v. LA (CCW policy). Jackson v. SF (Ammo/Storage). Teixeira (FFL Zoning). First Unitarian v. NSA (Privacy). Silvester (Waiting Period). Schoepf (DROS Delay). Haynie (AW ban). SFVPOA v. SF (10+ mag possession ban). Bear in Public: Drake (3CA); Moore (7CA); Richards, Peruta, McKay (9CA).

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          UA-8071174-1