Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

[Mr.patriot1776]

Most people can't afford assault weapons. They cost too damn much. Just look at this listing on GunBroker: https://www.gunbroker.com/item/855738204

Or, did you mean a modern sporting rifle? They may look similar, but they are functionally different.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

In this particular conversation I don't think anyone's talking about a machine gun.
Besides the fact that all machine gun are collectors items now and come with collectors price tag

[Transient]

In this particular conversation I don't think anyone's talking about a machine gun.

Besides the fact that all machine gun are collectors items now and come with collectors price tag

I did respond to a post I quoted regarding "AW". It might be helpful to spread the word to them. [emoji6]

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Offwidth]

In this particular conversation I don't think anyone's talking about a machine gun.
Besides the fact that all machine gun are collectors items now and come with collectors price tag

Machine guns are banned because we got complacent. They should be legal. And they are what is called assault weapons. Not AR15 poodle shooters.

[Sputnik]

So they don't want to do this one via conference call like they're doing in the Rhode case? I wonder why not?

[kalifornia.kompliant]

Most people can't afford assault weapons. They cost too damn much. Just look at this listing on GunBroker: https://www.gunbroker.com/item/855738204


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/854856443

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[kuug]

So they don't want to do this one via conference call like they're doing in the Rhode case? I wonder why not?

The only reason I can think that Benitez would delay is for ammo and weapon stockpiles to refill. Otherwise, there is no advantage for us to be delayed.

[Aeneas]

The only reason I can think that Benitez would delay is for ammo and weapon stockpiles to refill. Otherwise, there is no advantage for us to be delayed.

That's a pretty good idea if a favorable ruling is planned, with the expectation that the state may be able to weasel out a stay.

[kuug]

That's a pretty good idea if a favorable ruling is planned, with the expectation that the state may be able to weasel out a stay.

Yes but that could take months to happen. This case was supposed to happen in January and we may not even get to oral arguments until August. It's ridiculous how much waiting we need to do even with friendly judges. There is no sense of urgency when it comes to the second.

[Aeneas]

Yes but that could take months to happen. This case was supposed to happen in January and we may not even get to oral arguments until August. It's ridiculous how much waiting we need to do even with friendly judges. There is no sense of urgency when it comes to the second.

Oh I agree with you. How anyone thinks that court cases taking over a decade to be adjudicated is even remotely acceptable is beyond me. The system is clearly broken.

[kuug]

So Benitez approved Rhode V Becerra for a teleconference date of April 1st but Miller is delayed indefinitely. What the ****?

[Luciansulla]

[kuug]

Where does it say that in the filing?

[Federalist50]

Where does it say that in the filing?

For Rhode?

Literally in the status for it:

"54

Mar 30, 2020

NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Status Conference set for 4/1/2020 01:15 PM in Courtroom 5A before Judge Roger T. Benitez. (no document attached) (gxr) (Entered: 03/30/2020)"

[johnireland]

Well I'm glad Benitez wants to see the defendants squirm to get the ruling we know he should already reach. I'm sure that's well worth not hearing the damn case until July or August.

And what happens if the judge dies before the hearing, or even the date for the hearing is set? Does that mean it has to go all over? Is a new panel of judges appointed. Does that wipe out all our gains and take us back to the beginning?

[kuug]

And what happens if the judge dies before the hearing, or even the date for the hearing is set? Does that mean it has to go all over? Is a new panel of judges appointed. Does that wipe out all our gains and take us back to the beginning?

I'll disregard your facetious tone and just ask you, if Benitez can do a teleconference for Rhode why isn't he doing the same for Miller? Is there really any advantage for waiting for NYSRPA just for a PI?