Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

[3rd_gear]

I dont know what your saying either. You can still buys guns.

It's quite obvious what he's saying. If next week or next month you were to suddenly need a weapon for self defense this law is prohibiting you from purchasing some of the most popular weapons in America and using them for that defense. None of us know for sure when danger will come for us so it's better to be prepared now rather than when it happens.

[pistol3]

I dont know what your saying either. You can still buys guns.

Not in San Jose.

[3rd_gear]

Hahaha. Yes. But it has nothing to do with this case.

Not in San Jose.

[kuug]

I dont know what your saying either. You can still buys guns.

What did you not understand about that? You can't buy any "assault weapons"

[3rd_gear]

No, he's saying he wants to buy a firearm. Last I checked, it's still possible.

What did you not understand about that? You can't buy any "assault weapons"

[kuug]

No, he's saying he wants to buy a firearm. Last I checked, it's still possible.

No, he did not say "buy a firearm." that would imply he was looking for any gun. This is a thread about Miller v. Becerra and California's AWCA. He said "The weapon" and was a clearly referencing the banned weapons and features the lawsuit and this thread are about. If he needs the banned weapon or part next week or next month then the court closure is of little comfort as he does not have protections and privileges like cops and judges do.

[3rd_gear]

OK.

No, he did not say "buy a firearm." that would imply he was looking for any gun. This is a thread about Miller v. Becerra and California's AWCA. He said "The weapon" and was a clearly referencing the banned weapons and features the lawsuit and this thread are about. If he needs the banned weapon or part next week or next month then the court closure is of little comfort as he does not have protections and privileges like cops and judges do.

[aBrowningfan]

No, he's saying he wants to buy a firearm. Last I checked, it's still possible.

Just not an AW.

[mcbair]

I was not speaking for myself. We are prepared and have been for a very long time. I was speaking on behalf of those who either were not able or are just waking up to the fact that they have been deprived of their Liberty to purchase the proper tools to defend themselves, families and property. Tools commonly owned for lawful purposes across the vast majority of this nation. The tools we have the pre- constitutional Right to own. We have the pre-constitutional Right to due process also. Why are these Rights pre-constitutional? Because our forefathers shed blood to secure these among other Rights before the Constitution was written and because these human Rights are gifts from our God!
It is not the right of the court to indefinitely suspend due process. Governments do not have Rights. Only people have Rights. Governments are constructs of the people to secure Rights. Governments commit WRONGS, any time they assume powers not expressly spelled out within the document which created them and which also expressly defines and binds the scope of governments activity. April 19th 1775 would have never happened in the society, filled with cowards which it would appear, populate this state today!

[Mr.patriot1776]

Preach brother

[sreiter]

I was not speaking for myself. We are prepared and have been for a very long time. I was speaking on behalf of those who either were not able or are just waking up to the fact that they have been deprived of their Liberty to purchase the proper tools to defend themselves, families and property. Tools commonly owned for lawful purposes across the vast majority of this nation. The tools we have the pre- constitutional Right to own. We have the pre-constitutional Right to due process also. Why are these Rights pre-constitutional? Because our forefathers shed blood to secure these among other Rights before the Constitution was written and because these human Rights are gifts from our God!
It is not the right of the court to indefinitely suspend due process. Governments do not have Rights. Only people have Rights. Governments are constructs of the people to secure Rights. Governments commit WRONGS, any time they assume powers not expressly spelled out within the document which created them and which also expressly defines and binds the scope of governments activity. April 19th 1775 would have never happened in the society, filled with cowards which it would appear, populate this state today!

State? I think you mean Country

[mcbair]

Sreiter, You are absolutely correct.....Since this site is targeted to California, and gun owners in California seem to be a particularly uninvolved bunch of people, I was referring to our state. The state we could take back in the very next election if conservatives, and gun owners would bother themselves enough to go vote. However generally, the malaise and lack of interest regarding our pre- constitutional Rights is general to the nation. There are bright spots and there is hope! Many States have gone to Constitutional carry. Most states have some form of quasi-Right to carry. Those of us in the Totalitarian states need to redouble our efforts. Demand the Courts proceed with due process. Demand Constitutional behavior or replace elected Sheriffs or any elected official who acts contrary to the Bill of Rights.

[kuug]

I have nothing new or insightful to say. I'm just salty we're delayed indefinitely when both the defendant and the plaintiffs asked for a teleconference. After we were already delayed in January and February.

[Transient]

Just not an AW.

Most people can't afford assault weapons. They cost too damn much. Just look at this listing on GunBroker: https://www.gunbroker.com/item/855738204

Or, did you mean a modern sporting rifle? They may look similar, but they are functionally different.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[ajb78]

Most people can't afford assault weapons. They cost too damn much. Just look at this listing on GunBroker: https://www.gunbroker.com/item/855738204

Or, did you mean a modern sporting rifle? They may look similar, but they are functionally different.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Based on your link, I think you mean assault rifles.