Are you kidding?
I have to ask because your points are so far out of the bounds of reality that they could easily be taken as a joke.
So you think that this is about race? Seriously? Liberals for some reason are stuck on the idea that mainstream people think the way that they do. Victimhood, entitlement and racism are very rarely what anything like this is about. No, it isn't about race for anybody except for a very silly and very loud minority of people who don't want to think things through and instead gravitate towards what is easy, simple and flashy. It's a lot easier to call everybody who disagrees with you racist than it is to explain why you are right and they are wrong.
"Patriotic Rebel"? Is that like a racist southern thing, again? Keep spewing nonsense like this and anyone not from the bay area will not be able to take you seriously.
Custer was working for the government, and got killed because he overplayed his position. I do think that your analogy applies to this situation, but for a different reason than the one you cite.
It seems to me that showing up with guns to oppose the government on some level equates acknowledgement of the existence of that government. Again, please think things through and don't just race to the quick and easy answer.
Be glad and grateful that better men than you or me are willing to actually show up and put their asses on the line to protect our civil rights from the government.
The Tea Party is the biggest grassroots movement in the history of our country, and could fairly be said to be anti-government in the sense that they want the government to get smaller and do less. For these reasons, I think that this is a valid issue to "gather the citizenry" as you say. In fact, it is the biggest and most valid issue for the reason mentioned. If you do not agree, please do reply to this with an explanation of your "why" if you can.
The party that is in control of the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court and has spent far more time in control of all three branches of our government than the Democrats in the last 25 years is not out of touch as you imply. I understand that for you it's about racism and the presidency, but for most of the country, it is not. If it was, the Republicans would not be in control of the most powerful and important branch of the government. If "real" Americans really supported the silly, childish and destructive policies of Obama and the liberals, they would not have so decisively clipped his wings as soon as they could. There is a reason that Obama can't get anything done. It's because the voters elected a nice looking, educated black man who speaks well. They did not elect any of his policies. I ask you to keep this in mind as you spew your leftist nonsense and try to package it as somehow credible in spite of the fact that you can't explain your positions.
You, like most of the people from the bay area are a hothouse flower. Your ideas do not grow naturally, they require an artificial environment to survive. That is why the rest of the country seems so stupid to you. They don't live in the tiny little echo chamber of the bay area.
I would love to have a debate with you on racism if you can explain your ideas without assigning motives, asking rhetorical questions or calling names. If you can do this, you will be doing better than 95% of the leftists that I have communicated with. If you choose to accept my invitation to debate on racism, I will prove to you that the U.S. is not racist. When I am done you will agree with me if you are fair and actually weigh and think through my argument.
You know where to find me if it's on, and I won't bring it up again is it isn't. If you do not care to debate I hope that you will think through what I have said rather than dismissing me as stupid because I don't come up with the "right" conclusion.
I have to ask because your points are so far out of the bounds of reality that they could easily be taken as a joke.
So you think that this is about race? Seriously? Liberals for some reason are stuck on the idea that mainstream people think the way that they do. Victimhood, entitlement and racism are very rarely what anything like this is about. No, it isn't about race for anybody except for a very silly and very loud minority of people who don't want to think things through and instead gravitate towards what is easy, simple and flashy. It's a lot easier to call everybody who disagrees with you racist than it is to explain why you are right and they are wrong.
"Patriotic Rebel"? Is that like a racist southern thing, again? Keep spewing nonsense like this and anyone not from the bay area will not be able to take you seriously.
Custer was working for the government, and got killed because he overplayed his position. I do think that your analogy applies to this situation, but for a different reason than the one you cite.
It seems to me that showing up with guns to oppose the government on some level equates acknowledgement of the existence of that government. Again, please think things through and don't just race to the quick and easy answer.
Be glad and grateful that better men than you or me are willing to actually show up and put their asses on the line to protect our civil rights from the government.
The Tea Party is the biggest grassroots movement in the history of our country, and could fairly be said to be anti-government in the sense that they want the government to get smaller and do less. For these reasons, I think that this is a valid issue to "gather the citizenry" as you say. In fact, it is the biggest and most valid issue for the reason mentioned. If you do not agree, please do reply to this with an explanation of your "why" if you can.
The party that is in control of the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court and has spent far more time in control of all three branches of our government than the Democrats in the last 25 years is not out of touch as you imply. I understand that for you it's about racism and the presidency, but for most of the country, it is not. If it was, the Republicans would not be in control of the most powerful and important branch of the government. If "real" Americans really supported the silly, childish and destructive policies of Obama and the liberals, they would not have so decisively clipped his wings as soon as they could. There is a reason that Obama can't get anything done. It's because the voters elected a nice looking, educated black man who speaks well. They did not elect any of his policies. I ask you to keep this in mind as you spew your leftist nonsense and try to package it as somehow credible in spite of the fact that you can't explain your positions.
You, like most of the people from the bay area are a hothouse flower. Your ideas do not grow naturally, they require an artificial environment to survive. That is why the rest of the country seems so stupid to you. They don't live in the tiny little echo chamber of the bay area.
I would love to have a debate with you on racism if you can explain your ideas without assigning motives, asking rhetorical questions or calling names. If you can do this, you will be doing better than 95% of the leftists that I have communicated with. If you choose to accept my invitation to debate on racism, I will prove to you that the U.S. is not racist. When I am done you will agree with me if you are fair and actually weigh and think through my argument.
You know where to find me if it's on, and I won't bring it up again is it isn't. If you do not care to debate I hope that you will think through what I have said rather than dismissing me as stupid because I don't come up with the "right" conclusion.




Comment