Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

This is why we can't have nice things

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    nick
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • Aug 2008
    • 19151

    Originally posted by NoSpam
    what I'm saying is that if he feels the need to make a difference and he likes carrying guns, why doesn't he go to the next level in the proper way and join the armed forces? I'm glad we have the 2nd Amendment, but I bet each and every person on this site knows at least some people who they would not feel comfortable with walking down the street with a rifle, plenty of loaded mags, and a big knife.
    Walking with rifles used to be fairly common, and is still common in parts of this country. You having a problem with it is the result of the new norm having been created over the past few decades in CA and other such places. Basically, just like a person can become conditioned to seeing others walking down the street with guns and not bothering with it, he can be conditioned to freak out because of it. In either case, rational thinking doesn't have much to do with it, and if it did, it would likely support something in-between: "Is he acting suspiciously? No? Alright then".
    DiaHero Foundation - helping people manage diabetes. Sending diabetes supplies to Ukraine now, any help is appreciated.

    DDR AK furniture and Norinco M14 parts kit: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1756292
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #32
      lilro
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 2374

      Originally posted by NoSpam
      I draw the line at the 2nd Amendment when a citizen causes more terror in his community than a terrorist.
      LOL you can't be serious. If that's the line, then Oakland PD should not be allowed to carry either.
      Last edited by lilro; 08-07-2013, 4:09 PM.
      There is no justification for the public servant police to be more heavily armed than the law-abiding public they serve...Unless...the government's intention is to be more powerful than the people.

      Comment

      • #33
        The Gleam
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Feb 2011
        • 12983

        Originally posted by NoSpam
        Just my opinion of course, but the kid is just playing soldier in the street with live ammo. Again, I'm not saying that he has to join the armed forces. I'm asking why he doesn't join the arm forces if he likes to play soldier so much. Seems like he likes the power trip of being armed to the teeth. I draw the line at the 2nd Amendment when a citizen causes more terror in his community than a terrorist.
        Digging your own hole I see....
        -----------------------------------------------
        Originally posted by Librarian
        What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

        If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

        Comment

        • #34
          CBruce
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 1993

          Originally posted by Loubot10
          That's neat but all of you would call 911 and arm yourselves if your kid came running into the house and said "daddy daddy there's a stranger walking around outside with a gun". lol
          If it's slung over his shoulder or holstered, I'm going to be wary. But once it becomes a regular occurance rather than a one time event I'm probably going to accept it as non-threatening.

          People with guns drawn, uniform or not, concern me much more than people simply carrying them.

          Comment

          • #35
            NoSpam
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2013
            • 711

            Originally posted by Merc1138
            Why does having live ammo matter? He doesn't appear to be doing anything irresponsible with it. Let me guess, you want ammo restrictions too? Stop hanging out with Feinstein.
            You were that little boy that put his finger half an inch from his sisters face saying "what? I'm not touching you" lol

            Comment

            • #36
              The Gleam
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2011
              • 12983

              Originally posted by NoSpam
              You were that little boy that put his finger half an inch from his sisters face saying "what? I'm not touching you" lol
              It appears you are that little boy on Calguns with his fingers in his ears and screeching an Anti-2nd Amendment bent.
              -----------------------------------------------
              Originally posted by Librarian
              What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

              If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

              Comment

              • #37
                eb47
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2012
                • 1530

                He's picking up litter while wearing a military like vest and his UNLOADED Grandfather's rifle. He seems to be doing this on a regular basis. I wonder, maybe if his scared law abiding neighbors would stop littering (Technically breaking the Law) he would stop his routine. Remember when you're pointing a finger at someone, there is three pointing back at you.

                Comment

                • #38
                  Moemoe1
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 1571

                  Me thinks we have a Feinstein lover here, wanna come confiscate my weapons while you're at it too?

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    NoSpam
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 711

                    Originally posted by nick
                    Walking with rifles used to be fairly common, and is still common in parts of this country. You having a problem with it is the result of the new norm having been created over the past few decades in CA and other such places. Basically, just like a person can become conditioned to seeing others walking down the street with guns and not bothering with it, he can be conditioned to freak out because of it. In either case, rational thinking doesn't have much to do with it, and if it did, it would likely support something in-between: "Is he acting suspiciously? No? Alright then".
                    This is very true. If CA were a more gun friendly state and I could CCW, it probably wouldn't bother me so much. However, a guy wearing a military style vest would still raise a red flag. He's more armed than the police.

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      Merc1138
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 19742

                      Originally posted by NoSpam
                      This is very true. If CA were a more gun friendly state and I could CCW, it probably wouldn't bother me so much. However, a guy wearing a military style vest would still raise a red flag. He's more armed than the police.
                      wtf does "military style vest" mean? Stop parroting crap from the local news.

                      Also, so what if he's more armed than the police? Again, in America we are allowed to be more armed than the police. FFS, just go turn your crap in at the next buyback.

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        The Gleam
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 12983

                        Originally posted by NoSpam
                        This is very true. If CA were a more gun friendly state and I could CCW, it probably wouldn't bother me so much. However, a guy wearing a military style vest would still raise a red flag. He's more armed than the police.
                        Hey, just by chance; have you ever bought an AK parts kit, attended an AK build party, then posted a mushy diatribe about your personal feelings and how icky you felt about the whole matter on the "Mother Jones" website??

                        Just wondering...
                        -----------------------------------------------
                        Originally posted by Librarian
                        What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                        If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          NoSpam
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2013
                          • 711

                          Originally posted by The Gleam
                          It appears you are that little boy on Calguns with his fingers in his ears and screeching an Anti-2nd Amendment bent.
                          It's ironic that you don't have the balls to practice your 2nd Amendment rights like the guy in the vid, but commend him for doing so.

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            NoSpam
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2013
                            • 711

                            Originally posted by Moemoe1
                            Me thinks we have a Feinstein lover here, wanna come confiscate my weapons while you're at it too?
                            sure, whatcha got?

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              The Gleam
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 12983

                              Originally posted by NoSpam
                              It's ironic that you don't have the balls to practice your 2nd Amendment rights like the guy in the vid, but commend him for doing so.
                              It's not "ironic" - it's called honesty. That is something for which you clearly have little knowledge. I've expressed my "balls" in my lifetime, enough times, in more ways than you will ever know or understand.

                              In my youth and younger years, I WAS the guy in that video - and did what he did; OUTSIDE OF A FEDERAL BUILDING MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO in front of armed police officers.

                              Now? Not so much. It's time for others to do their part too.

                              Where are you?? Hiding. But good luck to you.
                              -----------------------------------------------
                              Originally posted by Librarian
                              What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                              If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                NoSpam
                                Senior Member
                                • Apr 2013
                                • 711

                                Originally posted by The Gleam
                                It's not "ironic" - it's called honesty. That is something you clearly something for which you have little knowledge. I've expressed my "balls" in my lifetime, enough times, in more ways than you will ever know or understand.

                                In my youth and younger years, I WAS the guy in that video - and did what he did; OUTSIDE OF A FEDERAL BUILDING MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO in from of armed police officers.

                                Now? Not so much. It's time for others to do their part too.

                                Where are you?? Hiding. But good luck to you.
                                this explains a whole lot

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1