Walking with rifles used to be fairly common, and is still common in parts of this country. You having a problem with it is the result of the new norm having been created over the past few decades in CA and other such places. Basically, just like a person can become conditioned to seeing others walking down the street with guns and not bothering with it, he can be conditioned to freak out because of it. In either case, rational thinking doesn't have much to do with it, and if it did, it would likely support something in-between: "Is he acting suspiciously? No? Alright then".
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is why we can't have nice things
Collapse
X
-
DiaHero Foundation - helping people manage diabetes. Sending diabetes supplies to Ukraine now, any help is appreciated.
DDR AK furniture and Norinco M14 parts kit: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1756292
sigpic -
Last edited by lilro; 08-07-2013, 4:09 PM.There is no justification for the public servant police to be more heavily armed than the law-abiding public they serve...Unless...the government's intention is to be more powerful than the people.Comment
-
Digging your own hole I see....Just my opinion of course, but the kid is just playing soldier in the street with live ammo. Again, I'm not saying that he has to join the armed forces. I'm asking why he doesn't join the arm forces if he likes to play soldier so much. Seems like he likes the power trip of being armed to the teeth. I draw the line at the 2nd Amendment when a citizen causes more terror in his community than a terrorist.
-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
If it's slung over his shoulder or holstered, I'm going to be wary. But once it becomes a regular occurance rather than a one time event I'm probably going to accept it as non-threatening.
People with guns drawn, uniform or not, concern me much more than people simply carrying them.Comment
-
You were that little boy that put his finger half an inch from his sisters face saying "what? I'm not touching you" lolComment
-
-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
He's picking up litter while wearing a military like vest and his UNLOADED Grandfather's rifle. He seems to be doing this on a regular basis. I wonder, maybe if his scared law abiding neighbors would stop littering (Technically breaking the Law) he would stop his routine. Remember when you're pointing a finger at someone, there is three pointing back at you.Comment
-
This is very true. If CA were a more gun friendly state and I could CCW, it probably wouldn't bother me so much. However, a guy wearing a military style vest would still raise a red flag. He's more armed than the police.Walking with rifles used to be fairly common, and is still common in parts of this country. You having a problem with it is the result of the new norm having been created over the past few decades in CA and other such places. Basically, just like a person can become conditioned to seeing others walking down the street with guns and not bothering with it, he can be conditioned to freak out because of it. In either case, rational thinking doesn't have much to do with it, and if it did, it would likely support something in-between: "Is he acting suspiciously? No? Alright then".Comment
-
wtf does "military style vest" mean? Stop parroting crap from the local news.
Also, so what if he's more armed than the police? Again, in America we are allowed to be more armed than the police. FFS, just go turn your crap in at the next buyback.Comment
-
Hey, just by chance; have you ever bought an AK parts kit, attended an AK build party, then posted a mushy diatribe about your personal feelings and how icky you felt about the whole matter on the "Mother Jones" website??
Just wondering...
-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
-
It's not "ironic" - it's called honesty. That is something for which you clearly have little knowledge. I've expressed my "balls" in my lifetime, enough times, in more ways than you will ever know or understand.
In my youth and younger years, I WAS the guy in that video - and did what he did; OUTSIDE OF A FEDERAL BUILDING MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO in front of armed police officers.
Now? Not so much. It's time for others to do their part too.
Where are you?? Hiding. But good luck to you.
-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
this explains a whole lotIt's not "ironic" - it's called honesty. That is something you clearly something for which you have little knowledge. I've expressed my "balls" in my lifetime, enough times, in more ways than you will ever know or understand.
In my youth and younger years, I WAS the guy in that video - and did what he did; OUTSIDE OF A FEDERAL BUILDING MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO in from of armed police officers.
Now? Not so much. It's time for others to do their part too.
Where are you?? Hiding. But good luck to you.
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,869,206
Posts: 25,181,052
Members: 357,644
Active Members: 5,292
Welcome to our newest member, Ty160805.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 15982 users online. 34 members and 15948 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment