Agreed and sorry if that is the way it comes across. What I'm trying to do is show you guys stuff that needs to be thought of for next outing.
If you reread my posts you will see that the 20 is not a hard number. But it is only a rule of thumb the BLM guys have used in the past when I have conducted such events. There is no hard set number.
This is where you are 100% wrong and is why I am pointing this out. I fully understand why one would donate money to the guy and I would be the first in line to do so as well. But in the eyes of the BLM, it then becomes a commercial activity. Let me give you an example.
Group of 10 guys want to go on a river rafting trip down the american river. Since they know how to raft, they elect to run a private trip vs hiring a commerical outfitter. But the problem is that no one in the group has any rafting equipment. So their choices are:
1)Rent everything and split the costs. Could run $200 for the weekend doing this way or $20 each.
or
2) They find another guy that has the equipment and is willing to go along. But in a gesture of goodwill the guys kick in $5 each, so a total of $50 to the owner. This is to help with the cleaning and wear/tear on the equipment, nothing more.
Now if option 1 is taken, the BLM has zero issues.
If option 2 is taken, the BLM will fine the equipment owner for not having a commercial permit!
So in Area 52 case, the group could have "rented" the NFA guns from the owner (never mind the Fed laws here for this argument) and as long as the owner was not present then no commercial activity. On the otherhand, if the NFA owner shows up and all you guys do is give him a free meal in exchange to play with this NFA stuff, then it is legally commercial.
Anyway... I was asking specifically about the "20 people" reference you made. As this was a specific number - ....
NEXT; as for "donated money" put into a hat - because we felt like it
Group of 10 guys want to go on a river rafting trip down the american river. Since they know how to raft, they elect to run a private trip vs hiring a commerical outfitter. But the problem is that no one in the group has any rafting equipment. So their choices are:
1)Rent everything and split the costs. Could run $200 for the weekend doing this way or $20 each.
or
2) They find another guy that has the equipment and is willing to go along. But in a gesture of goodwill the guys kick in $5 each, so a total of $50 to the owner. This is to help with the cleaning and wear/tear on the equipment, nothing more.
Now if option 1 is taken, the BLM has zero issues.
If option 2 is taken, the BLM will fine the equipment owner for not having a commercial permit!
So in Area 52 case, the group could have "rented" the NFA guns from the owner (never mind the Fed laws here for this argument) and as long as the owner was not present then no commercial activity. On the otherhand, if the NFA owner shows up and all you guys do is give him a free meal in exchange to play with this NFA stuff, then it is legally commercial.


, along with about 3000 rounds more ammo than i needed!) i didn't know about any movies, poker games, or even campfire storytime until i read about them in the review forums. i wish i had spent more time walking around taliking with you guys. what a cool bunch of guys & gals that were there. we need to set up a cal shoot where motorhomes can park.

Comment