Okay, so now it's straight to the ad hominem attacks. I'm not raging, just describing the law. If you can't do any better than name-calling, we can call it quits.
You think your analysis is "correct", but you don't define what you mean by that. If you mean "follows the law", give me references to the code sections.
You think your analysis is "correct", but you don't define what you mean by that. If you mean "follows the law", give me references to the code sections.


Comment