Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Additional reactions culled from the case thread in Litigation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OleCuss
    Calguns Addict
    • Jun 2009
    • 8901

    Originally posted by John Browning
    Don't they run the risk of being sued for unlawful taking of property?

    I am still waiting for someone, anyone, to construct and share a legal argument that explains why it is not legal to buy any mag you want.
    Yes. But remember that this is Kalifornia. . . You can sue but you can expect any win to involve a whole lot of litigation and a whole lot of money - best hope that the NRA/CRPA takes up your case and helps you with it. Even then I'd not count on a win although I suspect this case to at least be somewhat helpful.
    CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Don't consider anything I post as advice or as anything more than opinion (if even that).

    Comment

    • ENTHUSIAST
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 4440

      Celebrate good times, come on, let’s have a celebration tonight!

      Comment

      • Hsu
        Member
        • Oct 2014
        • 312

        Legal layman here was the libs mistake modifying an existing law instead of creating new law that got the entire section struck down?

        Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • RickD427
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Jan 2007
          • 9266

          It's not about filling positions. You're probably right that police agencies would find enough applicants to fill vacancies even if qualified immunity went away. Keep in mind that most are having difficulty finding enough qualified applicants at present.

          One of the strongest arguments in favor of qualified immunity is that it facilitates discretionary decision-making by officers. Think about this - if some drunk walks up to you an the street an punches you out, do you really want the responding officer to say "Nope, I'm not going to arrest him. He could claim that it was mutual combat and then sue me."

          Or do you want for your daughter to be molested, and the responding officer refuse to arrest the suspect because there "isn't enough proof" that the crime was committed.

          Be careful what you ask for, you might get it.
          If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.

          Comment

          • nicky c
            Member
            • Jun 2016
            • 465

            Originally posted by Hsu
            Legal layman here was the libs mistake modifying an existing law instead of creating new law that got the entire section struck down?

            Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
            You could say that. The continued overreach and shenanigans expose them more and more to new legal challenges.

            Comment

            • michael1073
              Junior Member
              • Oct 2017
              • 70

              info@preppergunshop.com

              Comment

              • XD40Kyle
                Member
                • Jan 2010
                • 452

                We all know this is getting appealed on Monday but does anyone know the numbers of where ninth circus judges stand, Left vs Right?

                Comment

                • Napalm Bulldog
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 4266

                  Originally posted by tonyxcom
                  Because putting anything over 10rnds in a mag locked gun creates an AW.

                  Nothing about being able to legally own or buy these magazines changes AW law.
                  Yes ,but what about featureless?

                  Comment

                  • Nor*Cal
                    Veteran Member
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 2687

                    Originally posted by XD40Kyle
                    We all know this is getting appealed on Monday but does anyone know the numbers of where ninth circus judges stand, Left vs Right?
                    Monday is a holiday in CA, courts are closed.

                    Comment

                    • Smedkcuf
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2014
                      • 505

                      Originally posted by Nor*Cal
                      Monday is a holiday in CA, courts are closed.
                      April fools day is a holiday?

                      Comment

                      • akazabam
                        Junior Member
                        • Apr 2017
                        • 96

                        Originally posted by Smedkcuf
                        April fools day is a holiday?
                        whoosh or /s? Or is it really a holiday?

                        Comment

                        • TacoJockey
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 542

                          Originally posted by michael1073
                          Wow quite the CYA letter

                          Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • ENTHUSIAST
                            Veteran Member
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 4440

                            Originally posted by Nor*Cal
                            Monday is a holiday in CA, courts are closed.
                            My girlfriend pointed this out to me this morning she thinks Trump some how used the timing of the holiday (CA is the only state that observes Cesar Chavez Day) to slow down the Liberals and give us more time to buy mags.
                            Last edited by ENTHUSIAST; 03-30-2019, 8:18 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Ocguy31
                              Member
                              • Jan 2013
                              • 374

                              Originally posted by XD40Kyle
                              We all know this is getting appealed on Monday but does anyone know the numbers of where ninth circus judges stand, Left vs Right?

                              I don't believe they will have their ducks in a row that quickly. There are national implications that come in to play. Yesterday's ruling read like a love letter to Gorsuch.

                              I can see the CA DOJ trying to scare FFLs, but I think the reason we haven't seen the best and brightest legal minds of Calguns opine on this, is because they do not want to give them any ideas.

                              Comment

                              • Nor*Cal
                                Veteran Member
                                • Nov 2011
                                • 2687

                                Originally posted by Ocguy31
                                I don't believe they will have their ducks in a row that quickly. There are national implications that come in to play. Yesterday's ruling read like a love letter to Gorsuch.
                                Agreed. It will be interesting to see how they approach this ruling.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1