My turn to complain about vaccine mandates :D

[LBDamned]

That website's publisher is known to put out fake journals for profit. Lol.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

More irony - that he will excuse with babbling nonsense.

[as_rocketman]

That website's publisher is known to put out fake journals for profit. Lol.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

ad hominem, ignored.

It's a survey paper, J. Reproductive Immunology is a legitimate publication, and you've provided no facts to dispute it.

[MJB]

I love it.......your facts are wrong noooo your facts are wrong.......

It's like watching a whale scratch it's ***

[CheapBloke]

Elsevier is the publisher. "Google" its history.

They are all for-profit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[as_rocketman]

The only other one slinging facts is sd_shooter, and the facts he's bringing support my position, so..?

[as_rocketman]

Elsevier is the publisher. "Google" its history.

They are all for-profit.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Are you suggesting that publishers are usually non-profit corporations?

Is this some sort of wild claim that only good Communists can provide reliable science data, or do you just know nothing about science communication?

[CheapBloke]

Are you suggesting that publishers are usually non-profit corporations?

Is this some sort of wild claim that only good Communists can provide reliable science data, or do you just know nothing about science communication?

Science is funded right? In order to receive more fund, they show results that favor the group/organization/company that funded the researches' positions?

How many false science researches has there been in history? None?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[as_rocketman]

Science is funded right? In order to receive more fund, they show results that favor the group/organization/company that funded the researches' positions?

How many false science researches has there been in history? None?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

So you are arguing for Communist practices in science. Holy cow.

I'm in no position to further that agenda, so... good luck to you in your endeavors, sir.

[CheapBloke]

So me arguing that your evidence from a journal publisher is from a company that have put out fake research journals for profit is a communist thought? Hmm. Ok. Whatevers.

Who funds science by any chance? Is it the researchers themselves?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[CheapBloke]

What more reasoning are you seeking to vax or unvax your kid? You already made up your mind. You think youre smarter than the rest of us. No argument from us w/o a source link will change your mind, and even if we did provide, its false media to you.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[SanDiego619]

What more reasoning are you seeking to vax or unvax your kid? You already made up your mind. You think youre smarter than the rest of us. No argument from us w/o a source link will change your mind, and even if we did provide, its false media to you.



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Yep, there is literally nothing we could do to change his mind so let him make an idiot decision that could harm his kid. It's sad. I hope there are no long-term problems.

[as_rocketman]

You could try more name-calling. That might work.

I started this thread to talk about the absurdity of one-size-fits-all mandates. I have another thread to talk about vaccine safety data. Y'all enjoy making trouble, and that's fine -- but you've done a terrible job of demonstrating that I've underestimated the risks. Your claims just aren't supported.

[garand1945]

The studies on the safety of the vax are a reliable as the certs on steel used in our subs that were recently discovered to be faked. Prove me wrong.

[as_rocketman]

The studies on the safety of the vax are a reliable as the certs on steel used in our subs that were recently discovered to be faked. Prove me wrong.

The two processes are not remotely similar.

[tundraboomer]

Your claims just aren't supported.

Patience, Grasshopper. Time will tell.