Orange

[1911-CV]

It seems that other agencies have implemented the 90-day grace period on renewals (instead of 0). Just saw a note from San Diego.

[1911-CV]

San Bernardino and Riverside have also gone to the 90 day grace period allowed in the statute.

[socal m1 shooter]

San Bernardino and Riverside have also gone to the 90 day grace period allowed in the statute.

Admittedly it has been a while since I logged in to the OCSD portal but the last time-- do the math if necessary-- the "you can renew starting on..." date they provided was 140 days out from expiry. Maybe a CYA thing, no idea, no inside baseball here.

[1911-CV]

We're talking about allowing submissions as renewals after the permit has expired. Surrounding counties are providing the 90-day grace period allowed in the statute. Orange County had gone to a 'no grace period' on renewals policy, but that seems to have eased to a 60-day grace period.

https://www.ocsonc.com/services/ccw-permits

[Dvrjon]

We're talking about allowing submissions as renewals after the permit has expired. Surrounding counties are providing the 90-day grace period allowed in the statute. Orange County had gone to a 'no grace period' on renewals policy, but that seems to have eased to a 60-day grace period.

The statute (posted above) controls reporting actions of the IA to DOJ, not the renewal actions of the applicant. That is, the grace period can’t go beyond the 90 days since that is what triggers the reporting action. But, it doesn’t mandate the IA have a 90-day grace period. They could set it at 60 or 45 or zero.

[1911-CV]

The statute (posted above) controls reporting actions of the IA to DOJ, not the renewal actions of the applicant. That is, the grace period can’t go beyond the 90 days since that is what triggers the reporting action. But, it doesn’t mandate the IA have a 90-day grace period. They could set it at 60 or 45 or zero.

Agreed, the statute doesn't require the IA to give any grace period but was pointed at by this IA as the rationale for (initially) setting the grace period to 0. Glad to see they have adjusted their process.

[Dvrjon]

Agreed, the statute doesn't require the IA to give any grace period but was pointed at by this IA as the rationale for (initially) setting the grace period to 0. Glad to see they have adjusted their process.

As I said in my original response, “OCSD is reading this in an oddly stupid manner.”

[pythonfan]

Is it true that Orange County allows unlimited # of pistols to be listed on your permit?

[9Cal_OC]

Is it true that Orange County allows unlimited # of pistols to be listed on your permit?

Yes

[pythonfan]

Thank you for the speedy response. I am envious. I sure would like to have 7-8 on mine, but I'm limited to 3.

[Dvrjon]

Thank you for the speedy response. I am envious. I sure would like to have 7-8 on mine, but I'm limited to 3.

I support having as many guns as one wants on their license. Hell, we shouldn’t need licenses. But beyond the issues of becoming save-your-life proficient with a number of guns and the cost of certification on all of them, SB 2 significantly curtailed the true value of the practice.

Previously, every gun on the license was covered for carry at any time. That allowed us to transport any number of licensed guns loaded and not in a locked, secure container.

SB 2 limits the number of guns one may carry under license at any time to no more than 2. That means if you want to take >2 licensed guns to the range, anything over 2 must be unloaded and locked up. In your case, you can holster up 2 loaded, licensed guns and climb in your car and go. If you want to take the 3rd licensed gun with you, it needs to be unloaded and locked in a secure container.

3 gives you enough to challenge training competence and ensures at least 2 backups to come into service if the primary gun needs service.