Tweet
CGF is the 501(c)3 nonprofit that is bringing the lawsuits and education to advance your rights, including the Carry License Initiative. We appreciate your support!
-Brandon
-Brandon
-
Brandon Combs
I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.
My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer. -
I just pledged a measly 25.00 bucks a month for now!! I actually feel pretty good lol...sigpicComment
-
Originally Posted by Wherryj
I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?Comment
-
Sorry to revive this thread without any new info, but I can't believe that a GC statement based solely on being a private pilot, and visiting remote airfields, was sufficient for issue in OC.
I have specific circumstances unrelated to my being a private pilot, and am just trying to decide which road to take...maybe articulate both in my GC?
Just trying to get a plan together before I start drafting my GC.
Great site, great info, and glad to donate to the cause.Comment
-
Originally Posted by Wherryj
I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?Comment
-
FWIW, somebody can feel free to correct but the licenses approved by OCSD in the last few years that have to do with a work-related GC are typically restricted to be "valid during the scope and course of work only" (or similar language). If you can articulate a GC that relates to your non-work life, it should increase your chances of getting an unrestricted license. YMMV, and good luck.Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.Comment
-
How long has it been taking people to get a determination on GC? I submitted an application this past summer, and I still haven't received a yes or no. I check in periodically with the department, and I keep getting responses that they are undergoing staffing changes and what not.sigpic
DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is general in nature, which may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances, and is intended for informational purposes only. Consistent with Calguns policy, the information does not constitute legal advice or opinions and should not be relied upon as such. Transmission of the information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon any information in my posts without seeking professional counsel.Comment
-
Here's what the applicable PC section says about the application time frame:
As you can see, they're way over due in giving you an answer. You can call them and gently tell them so, which probably will p*ss them off and get you denied, or you can continue to wait.26205. The licensing authority shall give written notice to the
applicant indicating if the license under this article is approved or
denied. The licensing authority shall give this notice within 90
days of the initial application for a new license or a license
renewal, or 30 days after receipt of the applicant's criminal
background check from the Department of Justice, whichever is later.
If the license is denied, the notice shall state which requirement
was not satisfied.Sent from Free AmericaComment
-
It looks like the Bradys and Friends have joined the party... They seem to present their argument the Gura way though from a more theological viewpoint.
I haven't followed too many cases but it sounds like we just want to take this to a higher power. I can't read the Judge's context but they seemed less than concerned.
Edit: Would be nice to call them out for using the term "gun violence" while ignoring the other aspects of crime.Comment
-
I’m guessing they subscribe to the juvenile notion that the “manly” way to settle conflicts is with fistfights wherein, magically, no one is ever crippled or killed.Matthew D. Van Norman
Dancing Giant Sales | Licensed Firearms Dealer | Rainier, WAComment
-
I've heard that from many anti-gun people.
I like to point out that according to the FBI in 2010, twice as many people were beaten to death than shot with rifles of any kind (including AR-15s, AK47s, etc), so the idea that you can just "slug it out" and everything will end well is ridiculous.
Two situations:
1. You are in danger of losing your life and you have only one option.
2. You aren't in danger and you can diffuse the situation or simply walk away.
People who don't own guns usually don't understand this until they own guns.Comment
-
she step down yet??Comment
-
Anything going on in OC?Comment
-
The case is proceeding. You can keep up with legal updates from Michel's office here.Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.Comment
-
Western civilization represents the pinnacle of true human progress, and we should rightly be proud of it, delusional leftists be damned.
We know it's the family and the church not government officials who know best how to create strong and loving communities. And above all else we know this, in America, we don't worship government, we worship God.
President Donald J. Trump, Oct. 13, 2017Comment
There are currently 7398 users online. 145 members and 7253 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment