Los Angeles

[dazz397]

Fresno CCW from the Sheriffs Dept. Good for Fresno County and the State of California.. All you need.

What does this have to do with LA county CCWs?

[9Cal_OC]

What does this have to do with LA county CCWs?

He was being clever.

But I agree, doesn’t belong on this sub-forum.

[dazz397]

I thought he may have had some information on how LA County residents can get a Fresno CCW like a non-resident permit.

[Osp05]

Anyone have a direct number or email so I can contact the LASD CCW department? I tried the number on the website and was directed to a prompt about CCW information but that was it. I received a restricted number call last week but missed the phone call.

Sent from my SM-N986U1 using Tapatalk

[VinhTran1]

Anyone have a direct number or email so I can contact the LASD CCW department? I tried the number on the website and was directed to a prompt about CCW information but that was it. I received a restricted number call last week but missed the phone call.

Sent from my SM-N986U1 using Tapatalk

No number. U can only email them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chuynh22]

i live in the city of monrovia which has its own police but when i went their their website i see this? do i apply to LASD or my own city LE?

License to Carry a Firearm
207.1 APPLICATION OF POLICY
The Monrovia Police Department has entered into an agreement with the Los Angeles
County Sheriff to process all applications and license renewals for the carrying of concealed
weapons (Penal Code 26150; Penal Code 26155(e).

I'm in Monrovia as well, we're able to apply directly to LASD.

[Paladin]

Murders in LA Co up almost 200% this year so far. No wonder AV has kept liberalizing GC. The story along with brief video interview of AV at: https://www.foxnews.com/us/violent-c...tatistics-show

[Simba_lbc]

I just hope that people stay responsible and think about the consequences of having a CCW. It only takes one bad shoot and AV policies get stuffed down the drain and our CCW privilege goes away. Stay safe, vigilant, and responsible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Hsu]

I just hope that people stay responsible and think about the consequences of having a CCW. It only takes one bad shoot and AV policies get stuffed down the drain and our CCW privilege goes away. Stay safe, vigilant, and responsible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Problem is with the current environment every shoot is a bad shoot as long as you are in a blue area.

[chris09]

https://youtu.be/aKNQPhVucVY

[ekkthree]

someone set me straight on gc criteria as i'm someone who always carried some amount of work related risk but didn't apply before with the understanding that it was near impossible to get approved unless i worked in very specific fields.

i understand we're in the 'light green' stage and applications are encouraged. but i'm unclear on the practical implications for applying.

if you had work related risk that wasn't enough of a risk to qualify previously (when LAC was red in that map) then does being light green now mean that the bar to qualify is lower and that same work related risk may now qualify?

OR

does it mean that that same work related risk is held to the same standard as before (so likely to get denied even now) therefore it's preferable to set that aside and focus on recreation related risks because that would apply to a broader range?

i ask because i have more instances of near misses while at work that are documentable (police reports, cctv footage, receipts for security cameras, etc.) and easier to provide proof of. which, incidentally, also spans a longer timeframe so also easier to prove that it's an ongoing and inherent risk. whereas my recreation related risks, tho no less dangerous, are going to be more difficult to document because it's always in a public space and i'm isolated or around strangers who don't stick around to corroborate.

i'm fine with expounding on either side, but don't want to write a statement that reads like i'm just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.

[m1abob]

update...

My application was sent on 4-5-21, received 4-6-21 and today... 4/15/21 has been cashed..

[m1abob]

your answer

someone set me straight on gc criteria as i'm someone who always carried some amount of work related risk but didn't apply before with the understanding that it was near impossible to get approved unless i worked in very specific fields.

i understand we're in the 'light green' stage and applications are encouraged. but i'm unclear on the practical implications for applying.

if you had work related risk that wasn't enough of a risk to qualify previously (when LAC was red in that map) then does being light green now mean that the bar to qualify is lower and that same work related risk may now qualify?

OR

does it mean that that same work related risk is held to the same standard as before (so likely to get denied even now) therefore it's preferable to set that aside and focus on recreation related risks because that would apply to a broader range?

i ask because i have more instances of near misses while at work that are documentable (police reports, cctv footage, receipts for security cameras, etc.) and easier to provide proof of. which, incidentally, also spans a longer timeframe so also easier to prove that it's an ongoing and inherent risk. whereas my recreation related risks, tho no less dangerous, are going to be more difficult to document because it's always in a public space and i'm isolated or around strangers who don't stick around to corroborate.

i'm fine with expounding on either side, but don't want to write a statement that reads like i'm just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.

work related job is part of the yellow tier GC witch was what we were recently changed into. Now it has updated to light green GC witch involves recreational activities that pose a higher risk to your safety. So use your job for yellow tier and definitely include your light green GC as well... Whatever subject your interviewer concentrates on then that is what you will acknowledge and speak of only.

[VinhTran1]

update...

My application was sent on 4-5-21, received 4-6-21 and today... 4/15/21 has been cashed..

Nice no calls yet bro?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Paladin]

i ask because i have more instances of near misses while at work that are documentable (police reports, cctv footage, receipts for security cameras, etc.) and easier to provide proof of. which, incidentally, also spans a longer timeframe so also easier to prove that it's an ongoing and inherent risk. whereas my recreation related risks, tho no less dangerous, are going to be more difficult to document because it's always in a public space and i'm isolated or around strangers who don't stick around to corroborate.

IIRC, you do not need a CCW to carry in non-public areas of your workplace. So regarding your employment risk GC emphasize your risk while in public. A CCW is for carrying in public.