Los Angeles

[The Tiger]

I've been away from this thread for a while and feel like now I can take it seriously and put in my app. It seems like a lot has changed but this thread is so long I don't know where it start. Are there cliff notes for the current situation? I'm seeing pages of high fives and I have no idea what is going on.

[The Tiger]

..........

[Lockdown.-]

$100 and I'll jump on a zoom call with you the full rundown, how to apply, what qualifies as GC, where to bleach your *******, and what to expect at the interview.

[LrdVaderZ]

I wonder if positive (I hope) SCOTUS decision will warrant re-applying ahead of 1 year mark (if you have to count from denial, and not date of application)

[Stevo818]

I wonder if positive (I hope) SCOTUS decision will warrant re-applying ahead of 1 year mark (if you have to count from denial, and not date of application)

[LrdVaderZ]

I am not holding my breath for gavin, more that it would be possible to put in GC statement area that you are requesting CCW per and then list the SCOTUS decision notation

[Stevo818]

I am not holding my breath for gavin, more that it would be possible to put in GC statement area that you are requesting CCW per and then list the SCOTUS decision notation

I guess that would be a way to start the new case against CA if they denied you.


App Received: 4/27
Check Cashed: 5/18
Call for interview : 8/9
Interview: 9/10
Training submitted at interview by request. (Completed in August)
Live Scan Completed: 9/10
CA complete: 9/10
FBI: 9/10
Firearms: 9/16
GC: Light Red

RE ELECT SHERIFF ALEX VILLANEUVA

[Osp05]

My coworker application was received on 04/18/2021.

Check was cashed on 05/12/2021.

No phone call for an interview. So I had him email ccw unit on 10/28/2021. He received a response for his information for his application and the ccw unit acknowledged that they will look into it.

Today he received a call that his application was lost and he will go into an interview the beginning of December.

He will need to bring a new print out of his application for his file.

Luckily I had him email ccw unit or else it would have not been acknowledge that it was lost.

Sent from my SM-N986U1 using Tapatalk

[Lockdown.-]

I wonder how many of your guys' applications were also "lost"

TIME TO MAKE SOME CALLS BOYS.

[LrdVaderZ]

There was a VERY interesting article in Politico which also touched on carry issues - https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...-owners-522562

[localpew]

[bb557]

I've been away from this thread for a while and feel like now I can take it seriously and put in my app. It seems like a lot has changed but this thread is so long I don't know where it start. Are there cliff notes for the current situation? I'm seeing pages of high fives and I have no idea what is going on.

Welcome. Start here: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1482924

[BigKat660]

CCW Unit

My coworker application was received on 04/18/2021.

Check was cashed on 05/12/2021.

No phone call for an interview. So I had him email ccw unit on 10/28/2021. He received a response for his information for his application and the ccw unit acknowledged that they will look into it.

Today he received a call that his application was lost and he will go into an interview the beginning of December.

He will need to bring a new print out of his application for his file.

Luckily I had him email ccw unit or else it would have not been acknowledge that it was lost.

Sent from my SM-N986U1 using Tapatalk

[stoogescv]

I wonder if positive (I hope) SCOTUS decision will warrant re-applying ahead of 1 year mark (if you have to count from denial, and not date of application)

No reason to wait for a year from the date of denial.

If a decision is positive (Nash and Koch get their permits), then even if it is a narrow opinion, it will at least say the "proper cause" requirement, as applied by the permit issuer, must accept a general cause such as "desire to exercise my fundamental right of self-defense." It would not invalidate the NY statute but would require that it be applied in that way. The same would be required of law enforcement in any other "proper cause" or "good cause" jurisdiction, and the statute in California would not necessarily be invalid so long as the sheriff accepts the more general "good cause" as good enough.

If you have been denied with a checkmark in the denial letter next to "good cause," I would immediately submit a letter with a copy of the denial letter asking for reconsideration of your application on the basis of the new Supreme Court decision.

[LrdVaderZ]

No reason to wait for a year from the date of denial.

If a decision is positive (Nash and Koch get their permits), then even if it is a narrow opinion, it will at least say the "proper cause" requirement, as applied by the permit issuer, must accept a general cause such as "desire to exercise my fundamental right of self-defense." It would not invalidate the NY statute but would require that it be applied in that way. The same would be required of law enforcement in any other "proper cause" or "good cause" jurisdiction, and the statute in California would not necessarily be invalid so long as the sheriff accepts the more general "good cause" as good enough.

If you have been denied with a checkmark in the denial letter next to "good cause," I would immediately submit a letter with a copy of the denial letter asking for reconsideration of your application on the basis of the new Supreme Court decision.

Thank you for the advice I'll have to ask my cousin to help me with making a legaleze worded letter