Hmm. Most interesting.
So far, neither the Licensing Policy nor the CCW Policy have been updated/replaced at: https://lasd.org/ccw_info.html They both have his predecessor's restrictive GC language. I would think CGN's LA Co members would be climbing over themselves to find out if this is true....
For some perspective on how big this could be: usually, after Shall Issue (or in this case SD = GC), ~3-5% of the adult population gets CCWs. LA Co is ~10M. Let's say 8M are >21. 1% of 8M is 80,000. Let's go conservative: 3%, that's 240,000 CCWers! Right now, our state total is only >120,000, so that would be an increase of 200%
I can't wait to find out if this is true.
So far, neither the Licensing Policy nor the CCW Policy have been updated/replaced at: https://lasd.org/ccw_info.html They both have his predecessor's restrictive GC language. I would think CGN's LA Co members would be climbing over themselves to find out if this is true....
For some perspective on how big this could be: usually, after Shall Issue (or in this case SD = GC), ~3-5% of the adult population gets CCWs. LA Co is ~10M. Let's say 8M are >21. 1% of 8M is 80,000. Let's go conservative: 3%, that's 240,000 CCWers! Right now, our state total is only >120,000, so that would be an increase of 200%
I can't wait to find out if this is true.







Comment