Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Army dumping M9?????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    g17owner
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2007
    • 881

    The only viable option I think that would make sense is with the FNP or the HK USP. Both would be about the same cost as other brands and fill the need for an external safety/de-cocker the the Army likes. Both are tough, reliable and very simple. Glock would work as well but I see the lack of a traditional safety as being the limiting factor.

    Comment

    • #47
      Saym14
      Calguns Addict
      • Jul 2009
      • 7892

      wouldnt suprise me since the M9 was picked for political reasons and lobbying, not becuase the army thought it was the best.

      I dont see them leavig the 9mm as it is a standard NATA round.

      Comment

      • #48
        RRangel
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Oct 2005
        • 5164

        They say the frames last for 35,000 rounds and "locking blocks for 22,000."

        Comment

        • #49
          Matt C
          Calguns Addict
          • Feb 2006
          • 7128

          I actually really like the M9, except that I think the safety should be a decocker. The problem is really poor PMI. And people with little girly hands.

          Originally posted by RRangel
          They say the frames last for 35,000 rounds and "locking blocks for 22,000."
          LOL, yeah that could be a problem, but I think a redesign fixed that and there is a redundancy now to prevent the slide from entering your head (which apparently happened at least once).

          Oh, and I hate the 9mm ball round, but you can't blame the pistol for that.
          Last edited by Matt C; 08-28-2011, 7:29 PM.
          I do not provide legal services or practice law (yet).

          The troublemaker formerly known as Blackwater OPS.

          Comment

          • #50
            orangeusa
            • Jul 2009
            • 9055

            As you all know, the 92FS is the equiv of an M9. The 'S' stands for slide stop. Beretta just enlarged the hammer pin head and ground a slot in the slide to act as a catastrophic failure' backup.

            And there are shooters out there with 100k rounds through these guns, only replacements being trigger and slide springs.

            .

            Comment

            • #51
              repubconserv
              Veteran Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 3056

              Originally posted by Saym14
              wouldnt suprise me since the M9 was picked for political reasons and lobbying, not becuase the army thought it was the best.

              I dont see them leavig the 9mm as it is a standard NATA round.
              What is NATA?






              Comment

              • #52
                InGrAM
                Veteran Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 3699

                M&P!!!!! USA! USA! USA!!!!

                Comment

                • #53
                  luckystrike
                  Veteran Member
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 4176

                  Military wont have anything polymer, or anything other than 9mm. I would like to see the day when the military starts stocking .40sw.

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    VytamenC Tactical
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 2574

                    i would rather have a slingshot than a m9.

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      orangeusa
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 9055

                      Originally posted by vytamenc22
                      i would rather have a slingshot than a m9.
                      Nice - another webguy with excellent advice.

                      .

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        BajaJames83
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Jun 2011
                        • 6040

                        It would be nice if we went back to the 1911.
                        And what was the purpose of the new trials for a 45 where the FNP won out and then the military backed out...
                        NRA Endowment Life Member
                        USMC 2001-2012

                        Never make yourself too available or useful...... Semper Fidelis

                        John Dickerson: What keeps you awake at night?
                        James Mattis: Nothing, I keep other people awake at night.

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          monk
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 4454

                          I'm still of the opinion that more rounds give the shooter more chances to get it right then fewer bigger rounds.


                          NRA Member
                          SAF Member


                          A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            cmoore
                            Junior Member
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 55

                            Originally posted by Tacit Blue
                            It's also a heavy gun for a 9mm. They should go back to the 1911 again or a 40 cal, glock 22 or M&P. The M9 pistol i used to qualify at the range with, just jammed all the time.
                            While I agree, it'll only make a difference (terminal wound ballistics-wise) with hollow-point ammo, regardless of the caliber, yet the DOD can't seem to fit their heads around that concept...and I'm a big fan of the 1911 anyway...
                            cmoore...

                            out...

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              PandaLuv
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 641

                              OMFG!!!! Yes, I really don't like M9 and I'm joining.
                              If they adopt Sig, it will great ! Woo Hoo !!!
                              Молон Лабе
                              I'd rather be carried by 6 than judged by 12

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                marker
                                Junior Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 35

                                Originally posted by cmoore
                                While I agree, it'll only make a difference (terminal wound ballistics-wise) with hollow-point ammo, regardless of the caliber, yet the DOD can't seem to fit their heads around that concept...
                                This is why "the DOD can't seem to fit their heads around that concept"
                                Laws of War :
                                Declaration on the Use of Bullets Which Expand or Flatten Easily in the Human Body; July 29, 1899
                                ...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1