Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Army dumping M9?????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    mk3mitch
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 707

    Yeah I read this in Army times at work today. Really hope they go with something good. Can't go wrong with a Glock, ultra reliable and so easy anyone can learn on it quick.

    Comment

    • #17
      Dirty506
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 636

      pick up an army times... cover story saw it today

      Comment

      • #18
        tacticalcity
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Aug 2006
        • 10929

        Originally posted by Dirty506
        REALLY!?!?! i'm not a fan of the m9. not saying its a bad gun...i'm just not a fan
        I'll say it for you. Absolutely HATE the M9. Was issued it and owned one (ok, a I owned a 96FS which is the same just a different caliber) as my first civilian owned handgun. Later discovered Glocks and have been a Glock guy ever since.

        As for the story, I've seen one of these stories every six months ever since my own days in the service. The military is constantly evaluating new weapons. Everytime they do their own press releases a story implying the exisisting system will be relpaced. Some get adopted on a small scale, but usually what ends up happening is the existing system just gets some small upgrade - if that. Take any story released by the military with a MAJOR grain of salt, especially when it comes to their own weapon systems. Most of the time they are just blowing smoke. So we will just have to wait and see.

        I like the second story about SSGT Angie Johnson better. She is a heck of a singer. Go Air Force!
        Last edited by tacticalcity; 08-23-2011, 7:44 PM.

        Comment

        • #19
          orangeusa
          • Jul 2009
          • 9055

          I just don't see them going away from 9mm due to doublestack and NATO partners... And I'm not saying M9 is not due for a refresh, it's heavy and bulky IMO.... Beretta just got a very large order a year ago. Doubt it'll be replaced in the short term...

          Comment

          • #20
            o0RedEyE0o
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • Feb 2011
            • 254

            I can't stand the M9, hopefully they pick something much better.

            Comment

            • #21
              fullrearview
              Calguns Addict
              • Jan 2008
              • 9371

              Originally posted by Tacit Blue
              Here's an idea, go start pulling these out of DRMO. And quit giving them away to Police agencies on a ' loan'. Oh wait, those contractors are going to want to make some $$ and tell you about the new pistol on the block.


              SHHHH!!! I run my agencies 1033 program... Hush it!
              "Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest."~M.Twain~

              Comment

              • #22
                bohoki
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jan 2006
                • 20826

                they should use the sig 250 its modularity should be armory friendly

                Comment

                • #23
                  Army GI
                  Veteran Member
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 4284

                  Originally posted by tacticalcity
                  I'll say it for you. Absolutely HATE the M9. Was issued it and owned one (ok, a I owned a 96FS which is the same just a different caliber) as my first civilian owned handgun. Later discovered Glocks and have been a Glock guy ever since.

                  As for the atory, I've seen one of these stories every six months ever since my own days in the service. The military is constantly evaluating new weapons. Everytime they do their own press releases a story implying the exisisting system will be relpaced. Some get adopted on a small scale, but usually what ends up happening is the existing system just gets some small upgrade - if that. Take any story released by the military with a MAJOR grain of salt, especially when it comes to their own weapon systems. Most of the time they are just blowing smoke.

                  I like the second story about SSGT Angie Johnson better. She is a heck of a singer. Go Air Force!

                  Agreed. Wasn't the Army supposedly going to a H&K .45 ACP like back in 2005?

                  Right. I'll believe it when I see it.

                  Either way, I reiterate: I hope it gets replaced with the M4.
                  I purge the wicked. The impious madness must end. I shall be the instrument of Armageddon. It has gotten out of hand...
                  WTB: Winchester /Miroki 1895 .30-06; No1. Mk. III SMLE .303 British; M96 Swedish Mauser 6.5x55mm; M39 Finnish Mosin 7.62x54r; S&W 625 .45 ACP; Glock 17.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    FNH5-7
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 9407

                    Maybe Glock will wise up, add a manual safety and be the new side arm of the US Army.

                    Not that it needs one. Manual safety just tends to be one of the criteria set.
                    Originally posted by FalconLair
                    I weep for my country and what it is becoming.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      safewaysecurity
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 6166

                      HK USP 45 nuf said.
                      Originally posted by cudakidd
                      I want Blood for Oil. Heck I want Blood for Oil over hand wringing sentiment!
                      ^

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        monk
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jul 2011
                        • 4454

                        I honestly thought they had already gotten rid of the M9?

                        But with all the haters I wonder why it's so popular lol. I kind of want a PT99. I hear the ergonomics on it are good.


                        NRA Member
                        SAF Member


                        A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          SGT Loco
                          Senior Member
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 1765

                          One can only hope.

                          The M9 is not a bad gun, but we could be doing so much better, and probably for much cheaper.

                          ------
                          SGT Thomas Macpherson KIA 12 OCT 2012
                          SFC Ryan Savard KIA 13 OCT 2012
                          "Sine Pari"

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            tacticalcity
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 10929

                            Originally posted by Colt-45
                            Maybe Glock will wise up, add a manual safety and be the new side arm of the US Army.

                            Not that it needs one. Manual safety just tends to be one of the criteria set.
                            That was for liability purposes when they were intentional skimping on training and wanted to be able to do so while cutting down on the number of NDs. Some of us old timers were around when the change occured. They wanted more than just a manual safety at the time. They wanted an automatic decocker. Put it on safe, and it decocks and goes back the the DA pull thus making the chance of an ND even if the safety accidentally gets flipped off unlikely. Police agencies also liked that their officers always started off on the DA pull so that if it turned out to be a kid with a squirt gun, the officer could have time to change his mind before finishing the pull. Both were looking for mechanical solutions to solve budget problems that impacted training.

                            The problem is, in real life you don't have all day to pull the trigger. You need to be faster than the other guy or you die.

                            The good news is, the military has a totally different mindset than it did when they adopted the M9. Now they favor combat effectiveness over trying to cut their training budget. In fact, they are constantly looking at better ways to train troops these days. Amazing what two wars and third covert pseudo-war will do for the mindsets of those in charge.

                            That said, we'll see if anything comes of this. Switching weapon systems is more than just picking a better gun. It takes a massive chunk out of the budget which is already tapped. Since the pistol is a secondary weapon anyway the money might better be spent on training. Training is by far the best weapon we can provide our troops. I would love to see the M9 go, but more importantly I would live all of our troops to be trained before they deploy instead of after (like in my day) or in a lot of cases not all.

                            As for your absolutely insane suggestion. That is just plain sacrilege. A manual thumb safety completely defeats the purpose of a Glock. Might as well keep the Beretta M9 if you do that. Shame on you for making that suggestion. Give yourself a Gibbs love tap on the back of the head for me. (NCIS reference in case you don't watch the show. But if you do read the last paragraph with an Abby voice as intended).
                            Last edited by tacticalcity; 08-23-2011, 8:04 PM.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              themailman
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 2029

                              I vote HK 45. My M9 is godawful and I do whatever I can to leave it in the armory.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                chris
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • Apr 2006
                                • 19452

                                heard about this today. go back to the .45 and be done with it. it served our country well for 70+ years let it serve us again.
                                http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                                sigpic
                                Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
                                contact the governor
                                https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                                In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
                                NRA Life Member.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1