Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Arrested but never convicted

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #76
    matix101
    Member
    • Jan 2016
    • 366

    The ex leo dude kinda worries me he stated he was an "expert" witness in court cases for 3 years.
    During that time he was imposing his opinion as fact onto hundreds possibly thousands of jurors possibly persuading convictions onto "possibly" innocent people for petty things such as vicoden possession!
    Part of the reason why our justice system is completely skewed, you have gung ho narcotics officers testifying as a drug or dependence "expert" with absolutely zero medical, dependency, or phsycoligical background whatsoever with a completely one sided and cemented in opinion he has come to over his years of profiling actual criminals and innocents assumed as such alike!
    Quite frightening in all honesty!


    Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • #77
      Cokebottle
      Seņor Member
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2009
      • 32373

      That is why you have defense attorneys and they have their own expert witnesses, as well as the ability to cross examine.
      - Rich

      Originally posted by dantodd
      A just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.

      Comment

      • #78
        matix101
        Member
        • Jan 2016
        • 366

        Originally posted by Cokebottle
        That is why you have defense attorneys and they have their own expert witnesses, as well as the ability to cross examine.
        True true just the way he put it down like that.
        Like he was absolutely qualified to just profile, label, arrest and convict anyone caught with a loose pain pill in their pocket in the same fashion he would an international heroine smuggler!

        Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • #79
          stilly
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jul 2009
          • 10685

          Originally posted by PackersFan26
          I was not aware of the eligibility check when I purchased or I would've done that first.
          Well now you know.

          Honestly though now that we are all enlightened, you should just say thank you and walk away.

          Just let the thread die...

          Good luck on your gun purchase OP. May you come back to purchase many more...

          Originally posted by Cokebottle
          Ditto.

          Particularly when items like this are sold at every drug store, and no doubt have saved many people from overdosing or underdosing.

          What am I supposed to do with my blood pressure meds, where the prescription says HALF of a pill.
          Am I supposed to put the remaining half back into the original bottle (where it will fall to the bottom and eventually be ground to dust)?

          So it's a misdemeanor to leave that half pill in the catch area of the cutter?
          Wow. Reductio ad absurdum much? LoL. That was bad man. Really BAD. - Like, Aziz Ansari BAD...
          Last edited by stilly; 03-28-2016, 8:43 PM.
          7 Billion people on the planet. They aint ALL gonna astronauts. Some will get hit by trains...

          Need GOOD SS pins to clean your brass? Try the new and improved model...



          And remember- 99.9% of the lawyers ruin it for the other .1%...

          Comment

          • #80
            Cokebottle
            Seņor Member
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2009
            • 32373

            Originally posted by matix101
            True true just the way he put it down like that.
            Like he was absolutely qualified to just profile, label, arrest and convict anyone caught with a loose pain pill in their pocket in the same fashion he would an international heroine smuggler!
            Smugglers don't get caught by having 30 kilos discovered in their carry-on.



            Oh wait... I guess they do
            - Rich

            Originally posted by dantodd
            A just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.

            Comment

            • #81
              I Swan
              Calguns Addict
              • Sep 2010
              • 8770

              Originally posted by matix101
              The ex leo dude kinda worries me he stated he was an "expert" witness in court cases for 3 years.
              During that time he was imposing his opinion as fact onto hundreds possibly thousands of jurors possibly persuading convictions onto "possibly" innocent people for petty things such as vicoden possession!
              Part of the reason why our justice system is completely skewed, you have gung ho narcotics officers testifying as a drug or dependence "expert" with absolutely zero medical, dependency, or phsycoligical background whatsoever with a completely one sided and cemented in opinion he has come to over his years of profiling actual criminals and innocents assumed as such alike!
              Quite frightening in all honesty!


              Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

              I thought about that as well but also was wondering about what racial profiling and other questionable acts he may have commited while out on patrol in his career.

              Comment

              • #82
                PackersFan26
                Member
                • Feb 2016
                • 185

                Originally posted by matix101
                The ex leo dude kinda worries me he stated he was an "expert" witness in court cases for 3 years.
                During that time he was imposing his opinion as fact onto hundreds possibly thousands of jurors possibly persuading convictions onto "possibly" innocent people for petty things such as vicoden possession!
                Part of the reason why our justice system is completely skewed, you have gung ho narcotics officers testifying as a drug or dependence "expert" with absolutely zero medical, dependency, or phsycoligical background whatsoever with a completely one sided and cemented in opinion he has come to over his years of profiling actual criminals and innocents assumed as such alike!
                Quite frightening in all honesty!


                Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
                The fact that the guy said Vicodin is a "hard" drug, he kinda lost his credibility there. I'm not downplaying the fact that I assume it can be if used in ways inconsistent with the label, but I mean cmon. The average idiot would think "hard drugs" and most likely associate methamphetimine, cocaine, heroin, etc.

                But I digress. I think a true narcotics detective good at what he does/did, with all the "thousands" of arrests he made, wouldn't conduct himself in a such an arrogant, vulgar, and unprofessional manner.
                WTS/WTT Mini Drone System
                Please click the link below for a great deal!
                http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1181101

                Comment

                • #83
                  strongpoint
                  Veteran Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 3115

                  Originally posted by I Swan
                  I thought about that as well but also was wondering about what racial profiling and other questionable acts he may have commited while out on patrol in his career.
                  So it's not OK for him to make assumptions based on incomplete information about people he doesn't know, but it is OK for you to do so? Just thought I'd ask.
                  .

                  Comment

                  • #84
                    matix101
                    Member
                    • Jan 2016
                    • 366

                    Originally posted by strongpoint
                    So it's not OK for him to make assumptions based on incomplete information about people he doesn't know, but it is OK for you to do so? Just thought I'd ask.
                    I believe he said he was "wondering" not assuming...
                    But neither here nor there just thought I'd clear that up.

                    Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • #85
                      I Swan
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 8770

                      Originally posted by strongpoint
                      So it's not OK for him to make assumptions based on incomplete information about people he doesn't know, but it is OK for you to do so? Just thought I'd ask.
                      As mentioned I was wondering not assuming. You know what they say about assuming! Also LE is and should be held to a higher standard due to the power and trust placed in their hands.

                      Comment

                      • #86
                        liberallyloaded
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2012
                        • 1027

                        Originally posted by I Swan
                        As mentioned Also LE is and should be held to a higher standard due to the power and trust placed in their hands.
                        Whoa whoa whoa... LEO are dudes and dudettes, man. All the power to em for choosing that career, and I thank them for doing so, but they're people like you and me. I'd hate for any notion or connotation of a "higher standard" to be interpreted as "higher status" or "capable of holding special privileges" ...
                        sigpic

                        "I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen."

                        Comment

                        • #87
                          Chewy65
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Dec 2013
                          • 5041

                          Originally posted by PackersFan26
                          The fact that the guy said Vicodin is a "hard" drug, he kinda lost his credibility there. I'm not downplaying the fact that I assume it can be if used in ways inconsistent with the label, but I mean cmon. The average idiot would think "hard drugs" and most likely associate methamphetimine, cocaine, heroin, etc.

                          But I digress. I think a true narcotics detective good at what he does/did, with all the "thousands" of arrests he made, wouldn't conduct himself in a such an arrogant, vulgar, and unprofessional manner.
                          I don't know how you define the term "hard drug". I do know that vidocin is very easy to become dependent upon.

                          Comment

                          • #88
                            Chewy65
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Dec 2013
                            • 5041

                            Originally posted by I Swan
                            I thought about that as well but also was wondering about what racial profiling and other questionable acts he may have commited while out on patrol in his career.
                            WTF does "racial profiling" have to do with this thread and for that matter where did roostersgt say a damn thing about race in it? Questionable acts "he may have committed"? It sounds like you have a problem with profiling cops.

                            Comment

                            • #89
                              liberallyloaded
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 1027

                              Originally posted by Chewy65
                              I don't know how you define the term "hard drug". I do know that vidocin is very easy to become dependent upon.
                              Uhhhhhh, I would think that a drug would be considered "hard" if it-
                              a) was mind altering
                              b) was a highly addictive opiate that could be fatal in terms of dangerous side effects (especially pertaining to breathing)
                              c) had fatal interactions with alcohol (vicodin is a combo of opiate + acetaminophen)
                              d) presented clear and present danger to your organs if taken regularly (read:liver)

                              But uh, if you don't consider that a "hard" drug, all the power to ya...
                              sigpic

                              "I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen."

                              Comment

                              • #90
                                Cokebottle
                                Seņor Member
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Oct 2009
                                • 32373

                                Originally posted by liberallyloaded
                                Uhhhhhh, I would think that a drug would be considered "hard" if it-
                                a) was mind altering
                                b) was a highly addictive opiate that could be fatal in terms of dangerous side effects (especially pertaining to breathing)
                                c) had fatal interactions with alcohol (vicodin is a combo of opiate + acetaminophen)
                                d) presented clear and present danger to your organs if taken regularly (read:liver)

                                But uh, if you don't consider that a "hard" drug, all the power to ya...
                                That was his point.

                                OP doesn't consider it a hard drug... Chewy was questioning that.

                                Vicodin certainly is.
                                I've been prescribed it a number of times after minor procedures including some extremely painful oral surgery.
                                I've taken a total of maybe 5 tabs my entire life. I think I took 3 after the oral surgery and following day.
                                Several times I've not taken it at all.

                                Honestly? No... a 19 year old kid has no business in possession of the stuff unless they've got some major stitches or something is broken.
                                I tend to side with Rooster on THAT, but the fact remains that without a conviction, OP is not a prohibited person, and it was 5 years ago. I did some stupid stuff when I was that age as well.
                                Last edited by Cokebottle; 03-29-2016, 6:26 AM.
                                - Rich

                                Originally posted by dantodd
                                A just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1