MERGED THREADS "Bullet Button Assault Weapon" Regs

[IVC]

Yes, I think it's 100% unwinnable. What you'd effectively be asking the court to do is re-open registration for a previously banned AR configuration and that would be the framework for any interpretation the court would do. I think you'd need a much more compelling textual basis than the "well it's defined as an AW now so it doesn't matter if it has a BB or a standard mag release" argument, again IMO.

Fair enough - if you see it that way, and you understand both the law and the firearms, it's highly likely a judge who has no idea about the details would see it the same way.

On a different subject, what if I registered with a BB per their current "rules," then at some point later removed the BB. How would that play out if a DA wanted to charge me and what would he charge me with?

My question is about the attempt by the DOJ to redefine what "a firearm" is based on looks and a photo. How would that play out if they wanted to claim that my *registered* rifle is not the one "in the picture" even though it's the same S/N and the configuration is equally "assaulty."

[cyborg]

You know, technically you're right, but, they won't see it that way.

[spartanlee]

Well this is ****ING ridiculous!

[SkylineGTR06]

It looks like we have to take a picture of the configuration at the time of registration but I don't see anything barring you from changing the rifle as long as it stays within the same rules right? I can change the furniture and upper right?

[2Aallday]

"Effective other (Specify) January 1, 2017."

?

As much as I value that you tear apart crappy arguments, do you ever actually contribute anything 1) useful, and 2) actionable?

[ifilef]

So then why boast about todays featureless inclusion? Hypocrite much?

You are ignored. I'm not wasting my time with you. I was not boasting, I was stating a fact. They still got it wrong but it does not matter now, it is for the better.

[cyborg]

It looks like we have to take a picture of the configuration at the time of registration but I don't see anything barring you from changing the rifle as long as it stays within the same rules right? I can change the furniture and upper right?

[phdo]

So if I put the ARMagLock or the DFM on it would make it legal and I don't have to register, right?

[csshih]

So if I put the ARMagLock or the DFM on it would make it legal and I don't have to register, right?

correct, as it creates a "fixed magazine" firearm.

[truthseeker]

Anyone see this yet?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6k1Grb8o9nM

Was going to go featureless but this could be another option.

Almost looks like a mag release on the left, instead of the right, side of the firearm, to me.

[tonyxcom]

You are ignored. I'm not wasting my time with you.

Don't threaten me with a good time, hypocrite.

[skyscraper]

As much as I value that you tear apart crappy arguments, do you ever actually contribute anything 1) useful, and 2) actionable?

He may not be the bearer of good news, but he's been right before. Dont shoot the messenger.

[FABIO GETS GOOSED!!!]

As much as I value that you tear apart crappy arguments, do you ever actually contribute anything 1) useful, and 2) actionable?

I was trying to figure out where the other poster was seeing a February date? Lol

[BAJ475]

Anyone who registers is out of their mind. We should make a huge push to encourage everyone to NOT register.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you are not suggesting converting all of our AR to featureless, you are advocating that we violate the law, become convicted felons and loose are firearm rights. EITHER WAY, NO THANKS!

[LeadFarmer74]

I was trying to figure out where the other poster was seeing a February date? Lol

It's on the OAL website. Not sure what it means though.