Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • curtisfong
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2009
    • 6893

    Originally posted by Richmond10mm
    The Mighty 2nd is the finality. DC limo political stenchers can fart all they want. The argument was won 236 years ago. SCOTUS doesn't have any power over my God-given rights.
    That's not going to work if you're in jail (or dead), unfortunately.
    The Rifle on the WallKamala Harris

    Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome

    Comment

    • Richmond10mm
      Member
      • Sep 2015
      • 173

      Of all the judges living and dead, I only know one judges' name.

      Comment

      • ironman586
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2016
        • 32

        Armed Scholar Miller v. Becerra Decision

        Here is a quick update on the Miller v. Becerra Decision just issued by Judge Benitez and the legal side of things by the Armed Scholar. A lot of you will ask me what does this mean, so here is what you need to know.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brJxMSK5LNM
        Last edited by ironman586; 06-04-2021, 8:41 PM.

        Comment

        • BeAuMaN
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2015
          • 1193

          Originally posted by abinsinia
          I guess we don't know who the judges are reviewing stay requests .. I think the 9th circuit hide those judges from us.
          They do; I mentioned it in another thread that they decided one day to stop revealing who the judges are. I asked them if they told anybody or announced this decision beforehand, and the clerk was all "Nope!".

          The logic behind the decision if one considers it makes sense to a degree: By hiding the judges on the motions panel, this means that lawyers filing motions near the end of the month don't get to "game" the system by deciding that the current motions panel is almost likely hostile and next month's panel might have a chance of being less hostile.

          I'd like it if they'd post the previous month's panel every month though for statistical purposes. Given the change in makeup of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in theory it should result in some motion panels being 2 Republican nominated judges and 1 Democratic nominated judge, but the motions panel isn't randomly drawn either.

          Comment

          • Casoobaru
            Member
            • Mar 2020
            • 226

            Yeah it seems cool but sadly this is going to do absolutely nothing. Scotus won't take the case, California doesn't care about ethics, or the constitution. Our governor is a one man government. People popping popcorn now are downright delusional.

            Comment

            • mshill
              Veteran Member
              • Dec 2012
              • 4421

              It is extremely likely that the appeal for this will be held until there is decision in the NY case recently granted cert. They are expecting some guidance from SCOTUS on appropriate levels of scrutiny. If they get that guidance it is likely we win at appeal and no enbanc. Lacking any guidance from SCOTUS any win on appeal will go enbanc like every other win.
              The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.

              Comment

              • Richmond10mm
                Member
                • Sep 2015
                • 173

                Originally posted by curtisfong
                That's not going to work if you're in jail (or dead), unfortunately.
                I've never read such wisdom. Such profound insight into what I could accomplish if I was in jail or dead. Thanks bro!! Well I will leave you SCOTUS fanboys back to your regular programming of legal genuis.

                Comment

                • curtisfong
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 6893

                  Originally posted by Richmond10mm
                  I've never read such wisdom. Such profound insight into what I could accomplish if I was in jail or dead. Thanks bro!! Well I will leave you SCOTUS fanboys back to your regular programming of legal genuis.
                  I have no idea why you think this means I am a fan of SCOTUS.
                  The Rifle on the WallKamala Harris

                  Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome

                  Comment

                  • HibikiR
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2014
                    • 2417

                    One fairly greedy outcome would be that CA doesn't appeal to the 9th because other Democrat states don't want the damage against AW bans to spread to other jurisdictions. While that would be good for Californians it wouldn't help other states looking to have an AW case reach the national level.

                    Not likely though, all the money and hubris in CA democrats will see to that.

                    Comment

                    • Ishooter
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 904

                      Does this mean that we at least 30 days to have standard rifles without ugly featureless things? Freedom month starts today?

                      Comment

                      • bv141
                        Member
                        • Oct 2013
                        • 385

                        Originally posted by Casoobaru
                        Yeah it seems cool but sadly this is going to do absolutely nothing. Scotus won't take the case, California doesn't care about ethics, or the constitution. Our governor is a one man government. People popping popcorn now are downright delusional.
                        Governor's going to be recalled. And there are lots of evil liberals legislature's contributing to Newsom's reign of unconstitutional terror.

                        Comment

                        • bv141
                          Member
                          • Oct 2013
                          • 385

                          Originally posted by Ishooter
                          Does this mean that we at least 30 days to have standard rifles without ugly featureless things?
                          No, the case was already stayed by Judge Benitz himself.

                          See the Armed Scholar youtube video post above.

                          Comment

                          • SarcoBlaster
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2006
                            • 1775

                            Originally posted by Casoobaru
                            Yeah it seems cool but sadly this is going to do absolutely nothing. Scotus won't take the case, California doesn't care about ethics, or the constitution. Our governor is a one man government. People popping popcorn now are downright delusional.
                            You must be fun at parties.
                            My buyer/seller feedback.

                            Comment

                            • SkyHawk
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Sep 2012
                              • 23479

                              What are the chances that this decision has any impact on pending implementation of new assault weapon laws, namely the 'Title 1' stuff with a looming registration window?
                              Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

                              Comment

                              • SkyHawk
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • Sep 2012
                                • 23479

                                Originally posted by SarcoBlaster
                                You must be fun at parties.
                                Previously banned members always are
                                Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1