Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

[Dvrjon]

Seems like Giffard's could just donate staff to the state to help with this historical analysis .. I would guess their brief would just be more nonsense like the states brief.

[abinsinia]

A bunch of notices just got filed, I suspect it's the states "loging".

[559nFree]

Gifford's was rejected on the first go round. Nothing really has changed. So hopefully Benitez will reject the amicus again.

They should just stay out of it. The state should be more than capable of defending themselves.

[AKSOG]

Giffords pulls the strings on our states anti gun muppets

[1911su16b870]

From the Plaintiffs

COMPENDIUM OF WORKS CITED

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...2089.142.0.pdf

FYI the whole story on courtlistener.com here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16069141/miller-v-becerra/

Some free downloads, some you have to pay for.

[homelessdude]

Am I wrong or does it look like Bonta is trying to bury everyone in paperwork?

[Mute]

Am I wrong or does it look like Bonta is trying to bury everyone in paperwork?

He and the 9th are basically using paperwork and the judicial process to delay as much as they can because they know what they'd have to say when it comes time to answer the question. If they still choose to be obstinate, the SC may choose to reverse them all together. The lower courts have been given an opportunity to do it right, but some of the more anti-gun ones are choosing to play their BS games.

[abinsinia]

Am I wrong or does it look like Bonta is trying to bury everyone in paperwork?

I think the court requested the paperwork. There was an entry where the court asked for it because of the briefs being "oversized" here's the docket entry,

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Honorable Roger T. Benitez: The parties have filed oversized briefs. Each party is directed to provide a printed courtesy copy to chambers, as indicated in the Local Rules of Court. Further, each party is to file on the docket a compendium of works, articles, studies, internet articles, etc., cited or referred to in the briefs and attached declarations and provide a printed courtesy copy of the compendium to chambers within one week. (no document attached) (gxr) (Entered: 10/14/2022)

This was Oct. 14.

[homelessdude]

Making them show their sources. This is a good thing. Half the time Bonta is just pulling rabbits out of his hat.

[Drivedabizness]

Making them show their sources. This is a good thing. Half the time Bonta is just pulling rabbits out of his hat.

Not his hat.

[rewireroy]

So is everything still due by the 28th or has everything been extended another 10 days?

Im trying to figure out the 45 days plus 15 and if thats when we start the clock on waiting for a judgement?

[jcwatchdog]

So is everything still due by the 28th or has everything been extended another 10 days?

Im trying to figure out the 45 days plus 15 and if thats when we start the clock on waiting for a judgement?

[SpookyWatcher]

So theoretically we could get a ruling on Friday??

[TruOil]

So is everything still due by the 28th or has everything been extended another 10 days?

Im trying to figure out the 45 days plus 15 and if thats when we start the clock on waiting for a judgement?

I am unsure of what you are referring to. There is no time limit for the issuance of a decision from a federal court. (I have had trial court issue decisions on motions more than a year after the submittal date.) In any event, there is no way that the Court will have read everything AND written his opinion on the 28th of October. Assuming that it will be a lengthy decision, as his decisions past, I think you are looking more realistically at 30-60 days minimum if he hurries. AS others have noted, the AG has submitted a blizzard of paper.

[pbreed]