Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

"Assault Rifles" Gone For Good?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    Area 52
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 533

    Originally posted by neouser
    Perhaps we should stop calling them assault rifles first, since they're not really assault rifles. The whole reason why politicians are able to pass such crappy legislation is because they are more able to get public support if they use misnomers like "assault rifles" to confuse the public.
    I came to post this very message. Actual assault rifles have been de facto banned nationwide to those unable to scrape up $20,000 since the registration closed in 1986. If Calguns members don't even know an assault rifle from a semiautomatic modern sporting rifle, how do we expect John Q. Public to ever understand exactly why these bans are a trampling of their rights.

    Comment

    • #32
      five.five-six
      CGN Contributor
      • May 2006
      • 34870

      Originally posted by zoid52
      Ca is a cesspool controlled by IDIOTS corrupt public unions.
      FTFY

      Comment

      • #33
        -hanko
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
        CGN Contributor
        • Jul 2002
        • 14174

        Originally posted by neouser
        Perhaps we should stop calling them assault rifles first, since they're not really assault rifles. The whole reason why politicians are able to pass such crappy legislation is because they are more able to get public support if they use misnomers like "assault rifles" to confuse the public.
        Google "context". The state of California calls them "assault rifles". The public isn't confused, they simply vote Democrat.


        Originally posted by Area 52
        I came to post this very message. Actual assault rifles have been de facto banned nationwide to those unable to scrape up $20,000 since the registration closed in 1986. If Calguns members don't even know an assault rifle from a semiautomatic modern sporting rifle, how do we expect John Q. Public to ever understand exactly why these bans are a trampling of their rights.
        See above.
        True wealth is time. Time to enjoy life.

        Life's journey is not to arrive safely in a well preserved body, but rather to slide in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "holy schit...what a ride"!!

        Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in. Mark Twain

        A man's soul can be judged by the way he treats his dog. Charles Doran

        Comment

        • #34
          Hugga Nugga
          Member
          • Feb 2014
          • 371

          Democrat or Republican, the problem is leftist progressives. Californians have more issues than losing gun rights; banning guns is symptom of the progressive parasites. Until the voters figure out that they need to elect people who put the Constitution first, not by the letter that is associated with their name.

          That said, many of those who would support such an idea have wised up and move their assets, businesses, and families to states that have significantly more freedoms.
          Last edited by Hugga Nugga; 04-10-2014, 9:10 AM.
          -----------------------
          "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it. "

          Thomas Sowell

          Comment

          • #35
            Beelzy
            Calguns Addict
            • Apr 2008
            • 9224

            Did anyone say,"gone, like the dodo bird"?
            "I kill things for a living, don't make yourself one of them"

            Comment

            • #36
              gbran
              Member
              • Oct 2007
              • 171

              Gun rights and liberal majorities aren't compatible with each other and the political growth trajectory for the future looks like more liberal politicians.

              Our only hope is in the courts.

              Comment

              • #37
                Rainbow Warrior
                Banned
                • Apr 2010
                • 10501

                Originally posted by Lawyer
                Has the sun set on the ownership of proper assault rifles in CA? Will the day come when we can legally purchase an in-tact AK or AR without all stupid the obstructions or puny 10-rounders in this state?

                My intuition tells me no, unless of course the composition of our legislature is significantly altered. Still, I hate to vote "conservative" solely on the arms issue.

                Any thoughts?


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                That is not the only reason to vote out the current azzhats.

                Comment

                • #38
                  toby
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 10576

                  Some were just born to late to have enjoyed freedom as it once was..

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca
                    Veteran Member
                    • Feb 2013
                    • 2995

                    Originally posted by toby
                    Some were just born to late to have enjoyed freedom as it once was..
                    ^^This. The domestication process is already complete for too many.
                    __________________________________________________ _____________




                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      Californio
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 4169

                      "Assault Rifles" by definition are "select-fire" and been regulated since 1934.

                      Do you mean the totally made up and ambiguous "Assault Weapons" definition that the Legislature adds at will more and more firearms to, such as last year trying to add all semi-automatic pistols and rifles, centerfire and rimfire, trying to make a Ruger 10/22 a defined "Assault Weapon"

                      Please read:








                      Originally posted by Lawyer
                      Has the sun set on the ownership of proper assault rifles in CA? Will the day come when we can legally purchase an in-tact AK or AR without all stupid the obstructions or puny 10-rounders in this state?

                      My intuition tells me no, unless of course the composition of our legislature is significantly altered. Still, I hate to vote "conservative" solely on the arms issue.

                      Any thoughts?


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                      "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca
                        Veteran Member
                        • Feb 2013
                        • 2995

                        Originally posted by Californio
                        "Assault Rifles" by definition are "select-fire" and been regulated since 1934.

                        Do you mean the totally made up and ambiguous "Assault Weapons" definition that the Legislature adds at will more and more firearms to, such as last year trying to add all semi-automatic pistols and rifles, centerfire and rimfire, trying to make a Ruger 10/22 a defined "Assault Weapon"

                        Please read:

                        http://www.assaultweapon.info
                        Yea "assault rifles" like my tube fed Marlin model 60 22lr.
                        __________________________________________________ _____________




                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          Lawyer
                          Member
                          • Mar 2014
                          • 213

                          Originally posted by Hugga Nugga
                          Democrat or Republican, the problem is leftist progressives. Californians have more issues than losing gun rights; banning guns is symptom of the progressive parasites. Until the voters figure out that they need to elect people who put the Constitution first, not by the letter that is associated with their name.

                          That said, many of those who would support such an idea have wised up and move their assets, businesses, and families to states that have significantly more freedoms.

                          "Progressive Parasites" is a harsh characterization. If you vote for candidates based solely on political affiliation, you are nothing more than a gang-member. I'm looking forward to voting conservative, if only the GOP would stop nominating a clown car full of bozos.




                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            Lawyer
                            Member
                            • Mar 2014
                            • 213

                            A lot of contentious responses taking issue with semantics. "Semi-Automatic Sport Rifles" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.

                            If "assault rifle" was a characterization that was engineered to carry a negative connotation, surely you must acknowledge that "sport rifle" is also the product of a different agenda.






                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              riddler408
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2013
                              • 1746

                              Originally posted by Lawyer
                              Has the sun set on the ownership of proper assault rifles in CA? Will the day come when we can legally purchase an in-tact AK or AR without all stupid the obstructions or puny 10-rounders in this state?

                              My intuition tells me no, unless of course the composition of our legislature is significantly altered. Still, I hate to vote "conservative" solely on the arms issue.

                              Any thoughts?


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                              my thought?

                              100% fail...
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                rexblaine
                                Member
                                • Aug 2011
                                • 300

                                Are YOU ever going to get mad and just stop following these fools?

                                Tell me when it's time.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1