Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

PM sent vs I'll Take it

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    glockster
    Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 465

    As a buyer or seller, IMHO, once an "I'll take it" is confirmed and agreed upon by both the seller and buyer then we have a deal regardless of first PM or post in thread.

    Comment

    • #47
      JWHuey
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 2300

      Originally posted by madjack956
      Nowadays your absolutely correct. But there used to be a time when a mans word was Golden and all that was required.
      THIS^ Is the ONLY thing that should even matter.

      That's what my dad taught me anyway. I have no use for people who don't do what they say they are going to do.

      In life or in business.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #48
        Dannicus
        Veteran Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 2577

        I prefer buyers don't post anything in my ads. Too many guys post "I'll take it." and end up being too far away or not making a satisfactory offer.

        Comment

        • #49
          The Gleam
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2011
          • 12394

          -----------------------------------------------
          Originally posted by Librarian
          What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

          If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

          Comment

          • #50
            The Gleam
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2011
            • 12394

            Originally posted by Dannicus
            I prefer buyers don't post anything in my ads. Too many guys post "I'll take it." and end up being too far away or not making a satisfactory offer.
            Oxymoron in your own sentence;

            "I'll Take It" - does NOT mean an offer follows or there is something to "negotiate". It means the buyer is a go, likes the price as posted, there is nothing to discuss, it's a done deal no matter how far the buyer must drive TO MEET YOU on your terms; and the money is ready and waiting to be spent at the asking price.
            -----------------------------------------------
            Originally posted by Librarian
            What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

            If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

            Comment

            • #51
              12voltguy
              Veteran Member
              • Feb 2006
              • 4003

              Originally posted by JWHuey
              "PM sent" indicates interest in item. Usually the PM is an offer at less than asking price.

              "I'll take it" SHOULD be a non legal contract to purchase said item at stated asking price with no haggling involved. You know,like being a man of your word? (Which seems to not mean much in today's world)

              Too many people post I'll take it & then send a lowball offer, or want to do the "will you take xxx" upon meeting. Which, to me is a real D-bag move.
              If you're buying:
              We ask that you please don't post:

              Just "PM Sent"/"Email Sent", etc.
              Requests for pictures.
              Asking if an item is still available.
              That you're "interested".

              Comment

              • #52
                perpetual otter
                Calguns Addict
                • Jul 2007
                • 5093

                PM sent vs I'll Take it

                I have never had a problem with CG in selling or buying but I got screwed on a nice watch purchase on another forum even after I had already said "I'll take it". The seller then told me that they took the other offer that had already sent in payment. This was frustrating because I didn't have the guys payment info available to me and my pending PM said "I'll take it- where do I send payment to?"

                That sucked but I guess it was still up to the seller ultimately.
                I provide opinions...
                At a rapid rate.

                Comment

                • #53
                  monk
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 4454

                  Originally posted by joefrank64k
                  That would be great...except that's not what the forum rules say. You can post an "I'll take it" or "Offer Sent" followed by a PM...or you can just send an offer via PM. The OP's question was what takes priority? The guy who posted "I'll take it" first, or the guy who PM'd first?

                  What I've come to believe is that it doesn't matter...as long as you're not auctioning your item, you should go with the first solid offer to buy.
                  Looks like the rules where changed and you are right.

                  14) Question and Inquiries about products listed in an ad.
                  ...All offers other than 'I'll take it' must be made via Private Message. If you send an offer via Private Message, a post of 'offer sent' is acceptable, all other Private Message do not need verification such as 'pm sent' or 'incoming PM'.


                  NRA Member
                  SAF Member


                  A tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    Dannicus
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 2577

                    Originally posted by The Gleam
                    Oxymoron in your own sentence;

                    "I'll Take It" - does NOT mean an offer follows or there is something to "negotiate". It means the buyer is a go, likes the price as posted, there is nothing to discuss, it's a done deal no matter how far the buyer must drive TO MEET YOU on your terms; and the money is ready and waiting to be spent at the asking price.
                    Not quite an oxymoron, chief.

                    I think you're telling the wrong person what "I'll take it" should mean. You need to make a PSA to all the idiots that post I'll take it followed by a low ball offer pm or skiing me to meet halfway across the state.

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      JWHuey
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 2300

                      Originally posted by 12voltguy
                      If you're buying:
                      We ask that you please don't post:

                      Just "PM Sent"/"Email Sent", etc.
                      Requests for pictures.
                      Asking if an item is still available.
                      That you're "interested".
                      Wut?
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        The Gleam
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 12394

                        Originally posted by Dannicus
                        Not quite an oxymoron, chief.

                        I think you're telling the wrong person what "I'll take it" should mean. You need to make a PSA to all the idiots that post I'll take it followed by a low ball offer pm or skiing me to meet halfway across the state.
                        While not a "figure of speech" it seemed that your post was conciliatory toward people not holding true to what "I'll Take It" should mean, and encouraged their contradictions.

                        The first part of your sentence did not equate with the second, oxymoron-like in that it seemed you did not disagree but considered it a necessary evil, but that IS how some people think unfortunately - even people who are a victim of it.

                        Yet, I get it that you get it too. I wish everyone else would.
                        -----------------------------------------------
                        Originally posted by Librarian
                        What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                        If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          Dannicus
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 2577

                          Originally posted by The Gleam
                          While not a "figure of speech" it seemed that your post was conciliatory toward people not holding true to what "I'll Take It" should mean, and encouraged their contradictions.

                          The first part of your sentence did not equate with the second, oxymoron-like in that it seemed you did not disagree but considered it a necessary evil, but that IS how some people think unfortunately - even people who are a victim of it.

                          Yet, I get it that you get it too. I wish everyone else would.
                          I see the misunderstanding. We're on the same page now.

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            daringescape
                            Member
                            • Sep 2013
                            • 258

                            I recently purchased an item from a seller via PM - but I PMed, and communicated via text message, and arranged a price and meeting place. I did neglect to mark the thread with an "I'll take it" and the next day someone was mad because they posted "I'll take it" and the seller denied them. From now on I will post in the thread after I arrange with the seller via PM.

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              phase1
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2013
                              • 1753

                              Originally posted by Barang
                              The first who says: 1) I'll buy it. 2) Where do we meet? 3) What time? 4) Other info exchanged.
                              I like yours the most...
                              Originally posted by Intimid8tor
                              I don't need one but I might need one.

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                calif 15-22
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                                CGN Contributor
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 5896

                                Here is my two cents having sold 3 guns here.

                                The "I'll take it" to me is just a thread bump. Means nothing unless immediate email with "tell me where and when to meet"

                                An "I'll take it" with no PM is nothing.

                                All three of my sales where with PMs saying I'll take it.

                                I only go by PMs in the order they are received.
                                PMs at full price top off the list
                                PMs at offer even if before others drop down the list.
                                PMs with "can you wait or all I have is" are deleted.
                                Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
                                It's one thing to question everything . . . It's entirely another thing to reject simple, rational explanations in favor of ever more fantastic and far reaching explanations because you've decided the government cannot be trusted.
                                Originally posted by Hoooper
                                Anyone who says the American dream requires a specific pay range doesn't understand the meaning of the American dream
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1