Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Open Carrier Develops LUCC Rig - Video

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CitaDeL
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2007
    • 5843

    Open Carrier Develops LUCC Rig - Video



    Home made case with keyed lock. Looks GTG. No more school zone issues. No more (b) checks.



    Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

  • #2
    tgriffin
    Calguns Addict
    • Nov 2006
    • 5175

    For the low low price of your dignity. Act now.
    Originally posted by pullnshoot25
    I would love to have a hole cut in the ceiling so I could pop out and BAM! Hit 'em with my spice weasel...
    Originally posted by aileron
    The hassle would be between this. (_._) and this (_0_).
    Originally posted by Neil McCauley
    When Im wearing a miniskirt than yeah sure I use my foot to flush the urinals all the time!

    Comment

    • #3
      CrazyCobraManTim
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2005
      • 2096

      Locked Carry box?

      Anyone seen this video yet? AB144 hasn't even taken affect yet, and some enterprising individuals have this to offer....

      Seems alittle silly, but then again, not when considering our inane firearms laws here....

      Comment

      • #4
        GrizzlyGuy
        Gun Runner to The Stars
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • May 2009
        • 5468

        That's pretty cool. I see a small manufacturing business in his future.
        Gun law complexity got you down? Get the FAQs, Jack!

        sigpic

        Comment

        • #5
          CitaDeL
          Calguns Addict
          • May 2007
          • 5843

          Originally posted by tgriffin
          For the low low price of your dignity. Act now.
          What, if anything, is undignified by making your firearm available for use under the law?

          I would say that being unarmed is far more degrading than this person's solution.



          Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

          Comment

          • #6
            CitaDeL
            Calguns Addict
            • May 2007
            • 5843

            Dupe. By about 4 minutes.




            Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

            Comment

            • #7
              CrazyCobraManTim
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2005
              • 2096

              Thanks for the heads up.

              Comment

              • #8
                dalriaden
                Veteran Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 4556

                Ever seen the mythbusters where they try to jab the shark in the eye while being in its mouth? You really think you'll be able to grab the key, open your lockbox, draw and load your weapon while being assaulted/held at gun/knife point/pepper sprayed to the face?
                Good way to wind up severely injured or dead and for a criminal to get a gun. Maybe it'd be time better spent actually trying to build a rapport with elected officials/running candidates and educating people on how backwards the gun laws are.

                Comment

                • #9
                  wash
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 9011

                  He took away one of the big advantages of LUCC. That isn't concealed in any meaningful way.
                  sigpic
                  Originally posted by oaklander
                  Dear Kevin,

                  You suck!!! Your are wrong!!! Stop it!!!
                  Proud CGF and CGN donor. SAF life member. Former CRPA member. Gpal beta tester (it didn't work). NRA member.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    PsychGuy274
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2010
                    • 4289

                    Fight the power!
                    I am a law enforcement officer in the state of Colorado. Nothing I post is legal advice of any kind.

                    CLICK HERE for a San Diego County WIN!

                    CLICK HERE to read my research review on the fight-or-flight response and its application to firearm training

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Mesa Tactical
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 1746

                      Originally posted by dalriaden
                      Ever seen the mythbusters where they try to jab the shark in the eye while being in its mouth? You really think you'll be able to grab the key, open your lockbox, draw and load your weapon while being assaulted/held at gun/knife point/pepper sprayed to the face?
                      Even if you had a loaded firearm velcroed to the front of your shirt, you would be helpless in if an assailant immobilized you from behind. Especially if he brought four of his friends.

                      There will always be worst case scenarios where the defensive use of any weapon is not practical. The purpose of being armed is to provide protection in those situations - and there are many more than than the fanciful worst cases that you suggest - where it provides an enhanced margin of safety.

                      Your mileage may vary. Firearms for personal protection are a form of insurance. Some people choose to buy the insurance, others don't. The insurance costs more for some people and in some situations than for others.

                      The point we should be making is not whether the insurance is necessary or practical, but that it should be available to those who desire it.
                      Lucy at www.mesatactical.com

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        dalriaden
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jun 2011
                        • 4556

                        Originally posted by Mesa Tactical
                        The point we should be making is not whether the insurance is necessary or practical, but that it should be available to those who desire it.
                        And I'm not arguing that point. I fully support license to carry, and loaded open carry. Not to sound like an anti, but carrying a pistol in a locked box on your hip does strike me as having little penis syndrome. I'll be sticking with my pocket knife and violence of action if it becomes necessary to use, I place better odds on those then fumbling with a key/combination lock with adrenaline, endorphins, and fear pumping through your system.
                        I'm no legal eagle or politician, but fighting the good fight with this tactic doesn't strike as the most effective or practical way.
                        I'll applaud whomever decides to carry like this, and pass for myself.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          voiceofreason
                          Veteran Member
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 3785

                          I think it's pretty cool.

                          Would be better with a combination key + buttoned combo.

                          Wonder if it could be manufactured with a case that is nothing but lightweight injected plastic.

                          maybe a locking mechanism that works like a bullet button, in which ANY key will pretty much open it; but still require a key
                          "You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
                          John Quincy Adams

                          "You will never know how little my generation has traded away our freedoms and rights for. I'm sorry and ashamed for what we've left to the following generations."
                          voiceofreason

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            r3dn3ck
                            Banned
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 1900

                            double face palm. Deal with the problem rather than band-aid'ing solutions into place. Get our rights back.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              CitaDeL
                              Calguns Addict
                              • May 2007
                              • 5843

                              Originally posted by dalriaden
                              Ever seen the mythbusters where they try to jab the shark in the eye while being in its mouth? You really think you'll be able to grab the key, open your lockbox, draw and load your weapon while being assaulted/held at gun/knife point/pepper sprayed to the face?Good way to wind up severely injured or dead and for a criminal to get a gun. Maybe it'd be time better spent actually trying to build a rapport with elected officials/running candidates and educating people on how backwards the gun laws are.
                              Originally posted by dalriaden
                              And I'm not arguing that point. I fully support license to carry, and loaded open carry. Not to sound like an anti, but carrying a pistol in a locked box on your hip does strike me as having little penis syndrome. I'll be sticking with my pocket knife and violence of action if it becomes necessary to use, I place better odds on those then fumbling with a key/combination lock with adrenaline, endorphins, and fear pumping through your system.I'm no legal eagle or politician, but fighting the good fight with this tactic doesn't strike as the most effective or practical way.
                              I'll applaud whomever decides to carry like this, and pass for myself.
                              So, you would rather bring a pocket knife to a gun fight? Clearly there are circumstances where taking immediate action is preferable, but your hypotheticals are narrowly tailored to suit your arguement. (And could easily be used to disprove your preference to carrying a pocket knife.)

                              What good would a pocket knife be in the event of an indirect threat- like an armed robbery, mass shooter, or riot? Without a firearm, you have no hope to thwart an assailant or a group of assailants. If this is so useless, why then would you argue in favor for licensed concealed carry, if such carry requires the same amount of time to present a firearm for use?


                              Originally posted by wash
                              He took away one of the big advantages of LUCC. That isn't concealed in any meaningful way.
                              Funny. You got part of that right without intending to. You are correct that his handgun is not concealed, since it is in a 12026.1 compliant case. You are wrong however, when you assert that there is ANY advantage to carrying LUCC beyond compliance with the law.



                              Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1