Ever left bad feedback

[rkt88edmo]

How do you do that?

Look at your itrader page, under the column labelled "Options" there is a red triangle for reporting.

It is the same red traingle as report post if you look at upper right hand corner of the post next to the "#61"

[I Swan]

That is a good point. Different mods could be hadling different retaliatory neg feedbacks. I think I did mention it though. I feel it is extreme bad karma when someone uses excuses like a death in family to get out of a deal if not true. I suspect it happen a lot. I've gotten some wild excuses on eBay.

This is why I won't be leaving too many off list guns in CA don't want to deal with this BS. I am going to list some guns soon but not as many as originally planned. I sometimes don't mind losing consignment and auction fees to not have to deal with flakes and lowballers and PPT games.

[ZombieKiller]

Ever left bad feedback

Leave a neutral. If he leaves retaliatory feedback report it using the button.

Neutral? No way. Eff that. He flaked- left you hanging. There is a consequence.

NEGATIVE FEEDBACK. It helps our community here at CAlGuns... Retaliatory feedback is against the rules- if you co tact a mod they will help you sort that out.

I've experienced this... The mods helped me out in a timely manner... Kes & The Librarian rock.

There are dishonest people everywhere- but at least here on CalGuns we can warn each other about them.


Sent from my fire using smoke signals

[heidad01]

Neutral? No way. Eff that. He flaked- left you hanging. There is a consequence.

NEGATIVE FEEDBACK. It helps our community here at CAlGuns... Retaliatory feedback is against the rules- if you co tact a mod they will help you sort that out.

I've experienced this... The mods helped me out in a timely manner... Kes & The Librarian rock.

There are dishonest people everywhere- but at least here on CalGuns we can warn each other about them.


Sent from my fire using smoke signals

This makes good sense.
Why mark it "Neutral" if it is a Negative. No retaliation should be tolerated if the negative was deserved. Second retaliation should be a ban. why lengthen the process. Mods can look at it as a negative and make a ruling just as well as if it was a neutral saying "he was a no show without communication" or "the gun was posted as LNIB but it looked like it came back from a battle field", etc..

[I Swan]

I do agree rules should be amended to state that mods decision to remove a neg is final and if caught leaving it again you will get a ban. Very childish and ridiculous and a waste of everyone's time.

[rkt88edmo]

Neutral? No way. Eff that. He flaked- left you hanging. There is a consequence.

NEGATIVE FEEDBACK. It helps our community here at CAlGuns... Retaliatory feedback is against the rules- if you co tact a mod they will help you sort that out.

I've experienced this... The mods helped me out in a timely manner... Kes & The Librarian rock.

There are dishonest people everywhere- but at least here on CalGuns we can warn each other about them.


Sent from my fire using smoke signals

Well, that isn't how the rules are written

This makes good sense.
Why mark it "Neutral" if it is a Negative. No retaliation should be tolerated if the negative was deserved. Second retaliation should be a ban. why lengthen the process. Mods can look at it as a negative and make a ruling just as well as if it was a neutral saying "he was a no show without communication" or "the gun was posted as LNIB but it looked like it came back from a battle field", etc..

I do agree rules should be amended to state that mods decision to remove a neg is final and if caught leaving it again you will get a ban. Very childish and ridiculous and a waste of everyone's time.

Agree that it is a waste of time unfortunately vbulletin (or at least our implementation) doesn't have a good way to track this and see history (unlike post history where I can usually see all edits). Probably hasn't been enough of an issue that it has needed an official rule, but a lot of it goes back to communication when something is changed and why, and it takes extra time so it isn't always done...which leads to people drawing their own conclusions or leaving feedback again. Far from a perfect system, but you get what you pay for.

[D.A.V.I.D.]

Update: today this scumbag flake Bryan Pettersen (bryan16) leaves me feedback again (3rd time) and at the same time made up another one for another post (4th time). Hopefully this warrants him at least being blocked from my page if not banned.

[BigPimping]

Good feedback or no feedback. Thats my rule.

[rkt88edmo]

Good feedback or no feedback. Thats my rule.

You aren't helping your fellow members if you aren't leaving neutrals and bads where warranted.

[I Swan]

Update: today this scumbag flake Bryan Pettersen (bryan16) leaves me feedback again (3rd time) and at the same time made up another one for another post (4th time). Hopefully this warrants him at least being blocked from my page if not banned.

Let us know the outcome. I also had someone attacking me on my user profile before I just deleted it and added him to ignore.

[D.A.V.I.D.]

Good feedback or no feedback. Thats my rule.

Try to do a deal with bryan16 and see if you feel the same.

[heidad01]

Update: today this scumbag flake Bryan Pettersen (bryan16) leaves me feedback again (3rd time) and at the same time made up another one for another post (4th time). Hopefully this warrants him at least being blocked from my page if not banned.

That is just unacceptable any way you look at it.

Mods are busy enough without having to deal with this kind of $heet. This guy deserves to be banned.