Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Considering Fixed Power vs Variable 1-6 Scope

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FlyingPen
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 2377

    Considering Fixed Power vs Variable 1-6 Scope

    Having a bit of a analysis paralysis on this as I consider the Primary Arms 4x fixed and the Primary Arms 1-6x Gen 2.

    Rifle is a 16 inch Noveske barreled upper with a 13 inch NSR on a VLTOR MUR. I will be mostly running XM193 and 75gr BHA reloads. My previous experience in magnified scope shooting was with a Remington 700 and a Burris 10x.

    The purpose of the rifle will be general purpose and I want to tip toe into 3 gun.

    The idea of a fixed scope appeals to me. It should be more rugged and it'll be easy for me to get consistent with it because of the fixed magnification. Theoretically it should be brighter and clearer due to fewer lens elements and a less complicated design. It's also smaller.

    The variable scope appeals to me for the practically of having a decent 1x view although with added controls and complexity, there's just more to go wrong. This optic however isn't a FFP scope so there's even more to fiddle with.
  • #2
    jonzer77
    • Jul 2010
    • 8525

    Why settle for PA when you have a noveske?
    Originally posted by barrage
    That's because Excelsior threads are like toilet bowls. They're made for crapping in and occasionally pissing on the side of.

    Comment

    • #3
      ElvenSoul
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Apr 2008
      • 17431

      You might still be able to get a Leoupold 3x
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        Fjold
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Oct 2005
        • 22908

        Anything that you can do with a fixed power scope, you can do with a variable but the reverse is not true.

        The variable gives you the power to turn it down to a lower power to give you a larger field of which makes it a lot faster acquiring moving and or small targets. Turning it up gives you the advantage of a more precise aiming point.

        That's why the vast majority of experienced hunters advocating lower power scopes for hunting applications and why everyone in benchrest shooting uses extremely high power scopes for precision shooting.
        Frank

        One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




        Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

        Comment

        • #5
          PrimaryArms
          Vendor/Retailer
          • Jun 2011
          • 2676

          If your 3 gunning 1-6x

          -Dimitri
          www.primaryarms.com

          Comment

          • #6
            HK Dave
            Calguns Addict
            • Oct 2008
            • 5737

            Originally posted by jonzer77
            Why settle for PA when you have a noveske?
            This ^^^

            You have one of the most accurate uppers money can buy, give it what it deserves. Vortex Razor 1-6

            Comment

            • #7
              jonzer77
              • Jul 2010
              • 8525

              Originally posted by PrimaryArms
              If your 3 gunning 1-6x

              -Dimitri

              If he had a Delton then PA would be a solid choice but he has a Noveske. He should put a quality optic on a quality rifle.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              Originally posted by barrage
              That's because Excelsior threads are like toilet bowls. They're made for crapping in and occasionally pissing on the side of.

              Comment

              • #8
                Paperchasin
                YOU are next!!
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Oct 2010
                • 6407

                My vote goes to a 1-6x scope. Next step is deciding a budget and which 1-6x you want. Budget 1-6x = PA. One step up is the Vortex Razor. Climbing higher you have the Trijicon VCOG, Swarovski Z6i, Leupold Mark 6, Kahles K16i, US Optics SR-8C, and S&B Short Dot. Good luck!

                P.S. I ended up going with a VCOG because I found one at a great price.
                Feedback: https://imgur.com/a/mkdPdnQ

                Comment

                • #9
                  MrPlink
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 12532

                  Well it sounds like you have all the pros and cons hashed out.
                  The rest is up to you really
                  The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile

                  disclaimer:
                  everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    JMP
                    Internet Warrior
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Feb 2012
                    • 17056

                    You should check out some of those 1-6x scopes. The image is not great compared to a full size scopes. So, you really don't want to skimp on glass.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      FlyingPen
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 2377

                      Thinking it through, I think I might wait for the PA 5x scope and use an offset 1 o clock mount and a Burris Fastfire type of red dot for my 1x.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        ExtremeX
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 7160

                        Originally posted by FlyingPen
                        Thinking it through, I think I might wait for the PA 5x scope and use an offset 1 o clock mount and a Burris Fastfire type of red dot for my 1x.
                        And how much of that shooting is really going to be 3 gun?

                        I got a lot of respect for people like Jerry Miculek, because I cant stand shooting with offset sights.

                        You mention its going to be more of a general purpose rifle... without a doubt I would go with a quality lower power variable like a 1-6x.

                        I really like the Vortex Razor recommendation... you might also want to know it was originally designed as a gaming scope for 3 gunners.

                        Its one hell of a scope, even at that price.

                        You also have a theory about fixed scopes having better optics than their variable counterpart.... that's generally true with all things being equal, but something like a 1-6x Razor recommended above would blow both your original picks out of the water.

                        This video had some good reticle shots to give you an idea what its like.

                        ExtremeX

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          ExtremeX
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 7160

                          Originally posted by Paperchasin
                          My vote goes to a 1-6x scope. Next step is deciding a budget and which 1-6x you want. Budget 1-6x = PA. One step up is the Vortex Razor. Climbing higher you have the Trijicon VCOG, Swarovski Z6i, Leupold Mark 6, Kahles K16i, US Optics SR-8C, and S&B Short Dot. Good luck!

                          P.S. I ended up going with a VCOG because I found one at a great price.
                          I really like your recommendations... lots of quality stuff listed, but there are a few steps between them worth considering before going from a PA to a Razor if you just don't have the budget for it...

                          Vortex just came out with a budget 1-6x called the Strike Eagle and there is always the SWFA SS HD 1-6x MIL/MIL FFP.

                          Both of scopes falling between the PA and Razor but still on opposite sides of that price bracket.
                          ExtremeX

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            FMJBT
                            Veteran Member
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 4888

                            Another option worth considering:

                            U.S. Navy (Retired) 1994-2015

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              FlyingPen
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2007
                              • 2377

                              Originally posted by ExtremeX
                              And how much of that shooting is really going to be 3 gun?

                              I got a lot of respect for people like Jerry Miculek, because I cant stand shooting with offset sights.

                              You mention its going to be more of a general purpose rifle... without a doubt I would go with a quality lower power variable like a 1-6x.

                              I really like the Vortex Razor recommendation... you might also want to know it was originally designed as a gaming scope for 3 gunners.

                              Its one hell of a scope, even at that price.

                              You also have a theory about fixed scopes having better optics than their variable counterpart.... that's generally true with all things being equal, but something like a 1-6x Razor recommended above would blow both your original picks out of the water.

                              This video had some good reticle shots to give you an idea what its like.


                              Great points.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1