Having a bit of a analysis paralysis on this as I consider the Primary Arms 4x fixed and the Primary Arms 1-6x Gen 2.
Rifle is a 16 inch Noveske barreled upper with a 13 inch NSR on a VLTOR MUR. I will be mostly running XM193 and 75gr BHA reloads. My previous experience in magnified scope shooting was with a Remington 700 and a Burris 10x.
The purpose of the rifle will be general purpose and I want to tip toe into 3 gun.
The idea of a fixed scope appeals to me. It should be more rugged and it'll be easy for me to get consistent with it because of the fixed magnification. Theoretically it should be brighter and clearer due to fewer lens elements and a less complicated design. It's also smaller.
The variable scope appeals to me for the practically of having a decent 1x view although with added controls and complexity, there's just more to go wrong. This optic however isn't a FFP scope so there's even more to fiddle with.
Rifle is a 16 inch Noveske barreled upper with a 13 inch NSR on a VLTOR MUR. I will be mostly running XM193 and 75gr BHA reloads. My previous experience in magnified scope shooting was with a Remington 700 and a Burris 10x.
The purpose of the rifle will be general purpose and I want to tip toe into 3 gun.
The idea of a fixed scope appeals to me. It should be more rugged and it'll be easy for me to get consistent with it because of the fixed magnification. Theoretically it should be brighter and clearer due to fewer lens elements and a less complicated design. It's also smaller.
The variable scope appeals to me for the practically of having a decent 1x view although with added controls and complexity, there's just more to go wrong. This optic however isn't a FFP scope so there's even more to fiddle with.


Comment