Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Taurus judge

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Quiet
    retired Goon
    • Mar 2007
    • 30242

    Originally posted by radrs
    What are my chances if getting approved for that???
    Are you a prop master that works in the entertainment industry or a LEO?

    If not, no chance.
    sigpic

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

    Comment

    • #17
      radrs
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 17

      I am a LEO or Peace Officer whichever suites you

      Comment

      • #18
        Quiet
        retired Goon
        • Mar 2007
        • 30242

        Originally posted by radrs
        I am a LEO or Peace Officer whichever suites you
        Fill out and send in an app. Good luck.
        Dangerous Weapons Permit application.
        Application fee is $321 + $51 fingerprint fees.
        Also, there's a yearly renewal fee of $165.
        sigpic

        "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

        Comment

        • #19
          radrs
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 17

          Wow $372 right out the bag, gotta weigh my options. I wonder if that fee is a write-off

          Comment

          • #20
            SFFRONTMAN
            Vendor/Retailer
            • Jul 2007
            • 1531

            Its a CA double whammy, fires from a revolving cylinder and it is a SBS .

            Comment

            • #21
              radrs
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 17

              I hate whammy's

              Comment

              • #22
                Trader Jack
                Banned
                • Oct 2005
                • 452

                Originally posted by radrs
                Is it legal for a California Peace Officer to own a taurus judge???
                NO. Why would you want one???

                Comment

                • #23
                  Trader Jack
                  Banned
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 452

                  Originally posted by radrs
                  What hoops are you talking about??
                  Hula Hoops

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Trader Jack
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 452

                    Originally posted by radrs
                    What are my chances if getting approved for that???
                    Hopefuly none

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      Trader Jack
                      Banned
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 452

                      Originally posted by radrs
                      I am a LEO or Peace Officer whichever suites you
                      Geez from your posts I sure as heck hope not.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        ErikTheRed
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 1604

                        Originally posted by sgtbuck
                        Mine too..... To bad we can't get them here...
                        Nope, we can't get the Judge because its dangerous. California only allows safe guns. If its dangerous, you can't have it. Don't you know that?

                        Also, even though you already own 17 guns, California says you have to wait 10 days to get a new one. This is just in case you're planning a crime and would rather use a shiney new gun for the job, not one of your old ugly guns. Man, I sure am glad these people are looking out so closely for our safety.
                        Proudly nestled all snugly and warm in Hillary's basket. She even made room for my bibles and guns!


                        I've committed $10 a month to the CalGuns Foundation. Have you??? Join us and donate here!

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Plisk
                          Veteran Member
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 3007

                          Wow Trader Jack, way to make 4 posts inside of 4 minutes.

                          As to radrs, is it really worth it to pay all the fees for the Dangerous weapons permit just for a Judge? From your post I sounds like it's going to be a safe queen, is it really worth it?
                          "If it wears out, replace it. If it breaks, upgrade." -Cranky Air Force Vet.

                          Kevin

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            hellraiser
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 2347

                            im no billionaire, my girlfriends not a model and i cant have this gun..BUT I CAN DREAM!!!
                            i forget wich magazine but i just read a article about a new model that takes 3 inch magnum rounds...
                            Last edited by hellraiser; 05-15-2009, 11:17 AM.
                            I'm the best there is at what I do. But what I do best isn't very nice. --James "Logan" Howlett

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              dwtt
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 7470

                              You guys have got me confused because I think there's some misunderstanding here. Correct me if I'm wrong here.
                              The Taurus Judge is a hand gun, not a shotgun. It's not a shotgun because it doesn't have a shoulder stock for firing from the shoulder. So, there's no need for a permit for a short barrel shotgun.
                              A CA police officer would only have to go through whatever process is needed to get a handgun not on the approved list to get a Judge.

                              Anyone know if this is right or did Ca classify the Judge as a short barrel shotgun?

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                ke6guj
                                Moderator
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 23725

                                Yes, the Judge is a handgun, and does not meet the CA or federal definition of a shotgun, since it was not designed to be fired from the shoulder. Due to that, the shotgun AW regs than ban shotguns with revolving cylinders may not apply to the Judge.

                                However, CA's defintion of an SBS does not require the firearm to be a shotgun, but merely a firearm less than 26"OAL, and/or a barrel <18" that can fire a shotgun shell. Yes, it can be a short-barreled shotgun without first being a shotgun.

                                12020(c)(1) As used in this section, a "short-barreled shotgun" means any of the following:

                                (A) A firearm which is designed or redesigned to fire a fixed shotgun shell and having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length.
                                (B) A firearm which has an overall length of less than 26 inches and which is designed or redesigned to fire a fixed shotgun shell.

                                (C) Any weapon made from a shotgun (whether by alteration, modification, or otherwise) if that weapon, as modified, has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length.

                                (D) Any device which may be readily restored to fire a fixed shotgun shell which, when so restored, is a device defined in subparagraphs (A) to (C) inclusive.

                                (E) Any part, or combination of parts, designed and intended to convert a device into a device defined in subparagraphs (A) to (C) inclusive, or any combination of parts from which a device defined in subparagraphs (A) to (C), inclusive, can be readily assembled if those parts are in the possession or under the control of the same person
                                Jack



                                Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

                                No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1