That response was essentially, "We won't do anything illegal".
What we really want to know is if you see CCW permits as a right for all non felon citizens, or is it a privilege only for wealthy business owners?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Clara
Collapse
X
-
Months ago I wrote Jensen's campaign, just got this tonight:
Thank you for your interest in Kevin Jensen for Sheriff 2022 campaign and your question regarding ccw’s.
It has been widely reported that the incumbent won't define her concealed carry weapons policy amidst allegations and data that strongly suggest that the small number of quid pro quo permits granted were linked to contributions and favorable influence.
Kevin has made the commitment to a legal, responsible and fair process with regard to CCWs. Here is Kevin's response:
"I recognize how important this topic is to the residents of Santa Clara County. Unlike the current situation, the policy I plan to implement will be a legal, fair, transparent and consistent process. I have researched the policies and spoken with Sheriffs and staff of other jurisdictions and will be implementing the best of what is working across the State of California. This means an applicant must first meet all of the requirements set out by law. Each application will be evaluated using a fair and transparent process with the applicant being informed of approval or denial within the timeframe required by state law. Independent oversight will be put in place, and neither political influence nor campaign donations will improve one's chances of securing a CCW permit.”
Kevin’s plans include a comprehensive county-wide crime prevention program, focusing on proactive community policing model, education (includIng: internet crime, identity theft, school safety, bullying, gang prevention), and a home safety component with a strong emphasis on firearm safety to include education on the laws, best practices and critical importance of the safe storage of firearms.
Thank you,
Kevin Jensen for Sheriff 2022Leave a comment:
-
The only hopes for Santa Clara Co are: (1) criminal indictment motivating Smith to resign. (2) Smith losing re-election June 07. (3) A solid, pro Carry win in NYSRPA (before Independence Day). (4) A conviction and removal of Smith from office for civil and/or criminal wrongdoing.
So, unless Smith decides to liberalize acceptable GC before June there’s really not much to do besides supporting, volunteering and donating to the best challenger.Last edited by Paladin; 12-18-2021, 2:09 PM.Leave a comment:
-
I can't figure out why the County Executive Officer hasn't put her on leave, maybe since Sheriffs are elected that's not doable (I think it should be). Professionally, one or the other of them should have her spend some days on the beach while this is sorted. Paid/not, I don't care- she needs to sit down.Leave a comment:
-
I can't figure out why the County Executive Officer hasn't put her on leave, maybe since Sheriffs are elected that's not doable (I think it should be). Professionally, one or the other of them should have her spend some days on the beach while this is sorted. Paid/not, I don't care- she needs to sit down.Leave a comment:
-
Although Sheriff Laurie Smith hasn't been charged criminally in the pay-to-play concealed gun permit scandal, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said his office's criminal investigation helped pave the way for the Civil Grand Jury's corruption accusations.
Video;
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investiga...eriff/2756876/Leave a comment:
-
-
‘Unprecedented:' Santa Clara County DA Sounds Off on Grand Jury Corruption Accusations Against Sheriff
Although Sheriff Laurie Smith hasn't been charged criminally in the pay-to-play concealed gun permit scandal, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said his office's criminal investigation helped pave the way for the Civil Grand Jury's corruption accusations.
Video;
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds to me that she should take a leave of absence while this is sorted out- be it her call or the County's.
Note to Admins- might make sense to break off these "Adventures of Laurie" to its own thread at this point, rather than CCW. We could leave a reference to it here in the CCW thread? This is going to grow legs as it proceeds, no doubt. Your call of course.Last edited by NorCalBusa; 12-15-2021, 4:42 PM.Leave a comment:
-
I will be shocked if they kept the paperwork, that's a lot of $$$ and evidence.Leave a comment:
-
26205.
The licensing authority shall give written notice to the applicant indicating if the license under this article is approved or denied. The licensing authority shall give this notice within 90 days of the initial application for a new license or a license renewal, or 30 days after receipt of the applicant’s criminal background check from the Department of Justice, whichever is later. If the license is denied, the notice shall state which requirement was not satisfied.Leave a comment:
-
She has a court date on January 12 to declare if she wants a trial (as opposed to just resigning?).
Four weeks!
Last edited by Paladin; 12-15-2021, 10:06 AM.Leave a comment:
-
In theory - there's a fine associated with not replying to CCW applications within x (90?) days.
I've had an application on her desk for 14 years.
Could a civil jury assess that?Leave a comment:
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,855,025
Posts: 25,001,836
Members: 353,847
Active Members: 6,058
Welcome to our newest member, RhythmInTheMeat.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3404 users online. 150 members and 3254 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Leave a comment: