Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Orange

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #91
    RollingCode3
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 3221

    Originally posted by dantodd
    Look through the gc statements of corrections officers, they are very similar. You should be able to supply specific examples. If they deny start filing police reports for every threat.
    Do you know if they actually issue CCW permit to correction officers in OC? The last time I check, they require a letter from your employer stating your duties and why you feel you need a CCW permit. Good luck with that.
    Any gun owner who does not support the NRA is a freeloader.

    Comment

    • #92
      Window_Seat
      Veteran Member
      • Apr 2008
      • 3533

      5 sponsorships ($500.00) purchased. Any matches? Anyone for other counties?

      I'm from ALCO, and we're fully funded in the +, so I figured that due what the OC CCW initiative is facing...

      Erik.

      Comment

      • #93
        luckystrike
        Veteran Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 4176

        the only people with CCWs from OC that I have talked to have "conditional" CCWs I guess. kind of "only in the coarse/conduct of work" and whatnot. Kommissar hutchens is a stubborn one.

        Im really itching for one tho.

        Comment

        • #94
          PatientCone
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 976

          I am strongly considering applying for a CCW in Orange County and would like some help polishing out my good cause and getting the process started. Any info will help.. PM me. Thanks

          Comment

          • #95
            sima09
            Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 193

            What classes do we need to take to be POST certified?
            "If guns kill people do pencils misspell words?"

            "I do not agree with a word you say, Sir, but I will fight to the DEATH for your RIGHT to say it!"


            sigpic

            Comment

            • #96
              steadyrock
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Aug 2007
              • 10235

              Originally posted by luckystrike
              how is hutchens sheriff? I have not met a single deputy that likes her and half those guys refer to her as "the *****"
              Hutchens is Sheriff for two reasons:
              1. She misrepresented herself to the Board of Supervisors during the selection process, and gained appointment
              2. When she ran for public election last year, a group of self-styled CCW experts and wannabe LEO fanboys from some other forum decided to run their own candidate and split the "non-Hutchens" vote, based largely on a grudge held over from the Carona days. Though their candidate came in dead last (by a LOOONG shot), he still took away enough in votes and campaign strength from her primary contender to hand her an easy victory.


              Were it not for the misguided antics of a few, it is likely that OC would have a Sheriff today who stated he would issue for personal protection, and we wouldn't have to worry about fighting here. It's a shame, but poorly thought out strategies sometimes carry with them heavy ramifications.
              Last edited by steadyrock; 04-13-2011, 12:07 PM.
              Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.

              Comment

              • #97
                BigfootHunter
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                • Sep 2009
                • 770

                What forum was that?

                Comment

                • #98
                  1BigPea
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 1102

                  Originally posted by BigfootHunter
                  What forum was that?
                  I'll go out on a limb and say it was calccw.com
                  Originally Posted by Wherryj
                  I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?

                  Comment

                  • #99
                    luckystrike
                    Veteran Member
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 4176

                    Originally posted by 1BigPea
                    I'll go out on a limb and say it was calccw.com
                    I was kind of thinking the same, same BS as a cop AND ccw instructor on there telling people "NO!! AMMO IN THE SAME LOCKED CONTAINER AS THE FIREARM IS STILL LOADED!!!!"

                    Comment

                    • smokeysbandit
                      Member
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 221

                      Originally posted by steadyrock
                      Hutchens is Sheriff for two reasons:
                      1. When she ran for public election last year, a group of self-styled CCW experts and wannabe LEO fanboys from some other forum decided to run their own candidate and split the "non-Hutchens" vote, based largely on a grudge held over from the Carona days. Though their candidate came in dead last (by a LOOONG shot), he still took away enough in votes and campaign strength from her primary contender to hand her an easy victory.


                      Were it not for the misguided antics of a few, it is likely that OC would have a Sheriff today who stated he would issue for personal protection, and we wouldn't have to worry about fighting here. It's a shame, but poorly thought out strategies sometimes carry with them heavy ramifications.
                      This is incorrect. While I voted for Hunt, those votes for Hunter should not be vilified. He was a good candidate for our cause. In this election Hutchens was the incumbent and as such needed 50.1% of the vote in order to avoid a runoff. She received 52.7% of the vote, so regardless of any split that occurred between her opponents, she still got too many votes. The final split between Hunt and Hunter was only 7.5%.
                      Μολών Λaβέ
                      NRA Life Member
                      CRPA Member

                      Comment

                      • guntrust
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 792

                        smokeysbandit, i think your static, snapshot analysis ignores the likelihood that the acrimony, conflict, and confusion added to the campaign by Hunter's candidacy, endorsed by the Register though a longshot, inured to Hutchens' benefit in pushing her over 50% and diminishing Hunt's momentum.
                        David R Duringer JD LL.M (Tax), CA/WA/TX atty
                        CRPA Mag Must Retract Erroneous Bulletin Slamming Gun Trusts
                        Radio ads: http://Protect.FM
                        FREE training: http://guntrust.org
                        FREE design meeting: http://Protect.LIFE

                        Comment

                        • 1BigPea
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2008
                          • 1102

                          Originally posted by guntrust
                          smokeysbandit, i think your static, snapshot analysis ignores the likelihood that the acrimony, conflict, and confusion added to the campaign by Hunter's candidacy, endorsed by the Register though a longshot, inured to Hutchens' benefit in pushing her over 50% and diminishing Hunt's momentum.

                          ^^^^EXACTLY^^^^

                          One pro CCW candidate was enough.
                          Originally Posted by Wherryj
                          I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?

                          Comment

                          • RSC
                            Junior Member
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 93

                            Is there any news on the good cause info from Mrs. Hutchens yet.

                            I know, retorical question, but had to ask anyway. It just baffles me how long this stalling of a "simple" information request can take.
                            Niven's law #4:
                            F x S = k. The product of Freedom and Security is a constant. To gain more freedom of thought and/or action, you must give up some security, and vice versa.

                            Comment

                            • frdman
                              Member
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 168

                              Is anyone else besides me having trouble signing up to volunteer on here: https://calgunsfoundation.org/volunt...istration.html ?

                              Comment

                              • Stryprod
                                Member
                                • Jan 2008
                                • 414

                                About time I gave a little cash!!! Newest sponsor for Orange!
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1