San Diego CCW

[pewanon]

Did the sheriff actually visit you? I just received an email today to amend one thing on my paperwork. Today is day 78 of my 90 days.

Yes. It was in the morning sometime. I went out later and found the business card. They had already talked to my property manager so by the time I called everything was all good to go.

So I got the visit right after I uploaded the amended paper. Like I sent it at night and I got the visit the next morning. So if they're asking you to amend your application, they're checking your background and you're just a few days from approval (god willing, of course)


@SDgun23 right on! glad to make your acquaintance =) you might be just a few days from getting approved too, it was about day 81 I got the email.

Ok so Sunday night uploaded training cert, it's Tuesday about 1pm and I just got the email saying the permit has been sent to the issuance que and expect 3-4 weeks for it to be mailed out. More glorious waiting!

[Censored]

got the visit/business card from the sheriff today!

had in person appt on 9/20 so calling 12/20 the 90 day mark

Did the sheriff actually visit you? I just received an email today to amend one thing on my paperwork. Today is day 78 of my 90 days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SDgun23]

[pewanon]

Completed 8hr class, uploaded certificate (both papers) to permitium, and emailed sd sheriff, yesterday (sunday). now just waiting for permit to be mailed =)

[MajorCaliber]

just got the automated phone call. approved!

Glad that old ticket did not stop your process.

[trustno12373]

just got the automated phone call. approved!

Awesome that is great news! Congratulations and you made it through the process even tho there were some
hurdles. Carry safe!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[pewanon]

just got the automated phone call. approved!

[pewanon]

got the visit/business card from the sheriff today!

had in person appt on 9/20 so calling 12/20 the 90 day mark

[MajorCaliber]

Ok, so the deputy called me back about my email about an hour ago. He explained that he wrote it just as it showed up in the system, as was his obligation, and he couldn't show me. He said they had to put everything on the application but it didn't mean I wouldn't get permitted. He said I could write in the explanation on the application if I wished.

Odd that you can't see your own record. Just explain as best you can. It may just be a clerical error of some kind. I once bailed a friend who was a 6'2" red haired Irishman out of jail when he was arrested on a warrant for failure to appear for a traffic ticket that the record showed he got back when he was a 5'8" Black man.

In any case you should try to get to the bottom of this and get it corrected.

[CessnaDriver]

Ok, so the deputy called me back about my email about an hour ago. He explained that he wrote it just as it showed up in the system, as was his obligation, and he couldn't show me. He said they had to put everything on the application but it didn't mean I wouldn't get permitted. He said I could write in the explanation on the application if I wished.

It seemed like a productive call, and the deputy did seem as polite and helpful as everyone else at the sheriffs office I've interacted with throughout the process.

From the time of sending the email to receiving the call was barely 90 minutes.

Sounds like you could be ok then. If you can remember what was going on back then you can put it in the explanation. We're all human. Sometimes those things get lost in the shuffle, and you did remember paying. Not like the kept coming after you for it either.

[pewanon]

Ok, so the deputy called me back about my email about an hour ago. He explained that he wrote it just as it showed up in the system, as was his obligation, and he couldn't show me. He said they had to put everything on the application but it didn't mean I wouldn't get permitted. He said I could write in the explanation on the application if I wished.

It seemed like a productive call, and the deputy did seem as polite and helpful as everyone else at the sheriffs office I've interacted with throughout the process.

From the time of sending the email to receiving the call was barely 90 minutes.

[pewanon]

It was certainly a failure to appear. I return the email asking the wording be changed and/or asking for clarification.

[MajorCaliber]

I was about to click send and I remembered that when I had my appointment, we had amended one of the pages to reflect that I had paid, the only other traffic citation on my application. The sheriff wants to add the 2003 case as 5015 / 5405 obstruction of justice.

I looked through the March 2021 NCIC codes manual, it lists 5015 specifically as failure to appear, and there is no 5405 offense.

I'm thinking I should challenge this discrepancy a bit. Am I overthinking?

I think you should at least get an explanation/clarification. I'm confused though, were you actually charged with obstruction of justice at some point, and if so, were you ever notified of this? From the way you tell the story, it almost seems like the deputy wants to decide now it was obstruction of justice and that seems inappropriate. If you were never actually charged with obstruction, or even failure to appear for that matter, it seems to me that listing it as such on your application is simply inaccurate and perhaps even a violation of your swearing that everything on the application is correct. However, IANAL.

[pewanon]

I was about to click send and I remembered that when I had my appointment, we had amended one of the pages to reflect that I had paid, the only other traffic citation on my application. The sheriff wants to add the 2003 case as 5015 / 5405 obstruction of justice.

I looked through the March 2021 NCIC codes manual, it lists 5015 specifically as failure to appear, and there is no 5405 offense.

I'm thinking I should challenge this discrepancy a bit. Am I overthinking?

[pewanon]

It was from may 2003 and iirc, it was a traffic citation (i think driving on a suspended license) that resulted in a failure to appear. the sheriff just sent me an amended couple pages that updates the "traffic violations and accidents in the last 5 years" and "any arrests or criminal charges with or without disposition" to show this 2003 incident as an obstruction of justice charge.

i'm not even sure that i could verify that was the final disposition of the case, i remember a couple years ago finding the paperwork in my storage and tossing it, it was something like a $700 fine i paid over it when i finally squared up (i think about 5 years after the incident), in payments no less.

this does seem bizarre, since they're amending my application, maybe to justify denying the app?

oh well, all that's required of me is a signature. the email says return no later than tomorrow morning. will keep posted!